Cited by 40Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedical Coding and Health InformationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Predicting Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Using Administrative Claims

Open access
Albrecht, Jennifer S., Hanna, Maya, Kim, Dure, Perfetto, Eleanor M.·2018·Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictive models for earlier diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) that rely on variables requiring assessment during an office visit, such as cognitive function, body mass index, or lifestyle factors, may not be broadly applicable, since that level of data may be inaccessible or inefficient. OBJECTIVE: To build a predictive model for earlier diagnosis of ADRD using only administrative claims data to enhance applicability at the health care-system level. Building on the strength of this approach and knowledge that health care utilization (HCU) is increased before dementia diagnosis, it was hypothesized that previous HCU history would improve predictive ability of the model. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. ADRD was defined using ICD-9-CM codes and prescription fills for antidementia medications. We included individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Cases aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis between 2011-2014 were matched to controls without ADRD. HCU variables were incorporated into regression models along with comorbidities and symptoms. RESULTS: The derivation cohort comprised 24,521 cases and 95,464 controls. Final adjusted models were stratified by age. We obtained moderate accuracy (c-statistic = 0.76) for the model among younger (aged < 65 years) adults and poor discriminatory ability (c-statistic = 0.63) for the model among older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). Neurological and psychological disorders had the largest effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: We created age-stratified predictive models for earlier diagnosis of dementia using information available in administrative claims. These models could be used in decision support systems to promote targeted cognitive screening and earlier dementia recognition for individuals aged < 65 years. These models should be validated in other cohorts. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by AstraZeneca, Global CEO Initiative, Janssen, OptumLabs, and Roche. Albrecht was supported by Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research grant K01HS024560. Perfetto is employed by the National Health Council, which accepts membership dues and sponsorships from a variety of organizations and companies. The authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.11.1138

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albrecht, J. S., Hanna, M., Kim, D., & Perfetto, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Albrecht, Jennifer S.
Venue
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
Published
2018-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1138-1145
ISSN
  • 2376-0540 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-1032
OpenAlex
W2898476734
Cited by
40
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K01HS024560)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, administrative claims data, health care utilization, mild cognitive impairment, comorbidities, cognitive screening, decision support system, older adults
MeSH terms
Administrative Claims, Healthcare, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Drug Prescriptions, Prognosis, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Nootropic Agents, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review