The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progressive Punishment: Job Loss, Jail Growth, and the Neoliberal Logic of Carceral Expansion
Abstract
Winner, 2017 American Society of Criminology's Division on Critical Criminology and Social Justice Best Book Award An examination of the neoliberal politics of incarceration The growth of mass incarceration in the United States eludes neat categorization as a product of the political Right. Liberals played important roles in both laying the foundation for and then participating in the conservative tough on crime movement that is largely credited with the rise of the prison state. But what of those politicians and activists on the Left who reject punitive politics in favor of rehabilitation and a stronger welfare state? Can progressive policies such as these, with their benevolent intentions, nevertheless contribute to the expansion of mass incarceration? In Progressive Punishment , Judah Schept offers an ethnographic examination into the politics of incarceration in Bloomington, Indiana in order to consider the ways that liberal discourses about therapeutic justice and rehabilitation can uphold the logics, practices and institutions that comprise the carceral state. Schept examines how political leaders on the Left, despite being critical of mass incarceration, advocated for a “justice campus” that would have dramatically expanded the local criminal justice system. At the root of this proposal, Schept argues, is a confluence of neoliberal-style changes in the community that naturalized prison expansion as political common sense among leaders negotiating crises of deindustrialization, urban decline, and the devolution of social welfare. In spite of the momentum that the proposal gained, Schept uncovers resistance among community organizers, who developed important strategies and discourses to challenge the justice campus, disrupt some of the logics that provided it legitimacy, and offer new possibilities for a non-carceral community. A well-researched and well-narrated study, Progressive Punishment offers a novel perspective on the relationship between liberal politics, neoliberalism, and mass incarceration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ways that political scientists-in particular, settler political scientists-publish and speak to academic and public audiences, teach and mentor new scholars, and advise or inform stakeholders about carceral power can reproduce or counter its logics and legitimacy (Brown and Schept, 2017;Schept, 2015).”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Schept, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 181
Self-citationRace and ethnicity I: Property, race, and the carceral state
Bonds, A. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517751297 · Cited by 184
Where do Black lives matter? Race, stigma, and place in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Loyd, J. M., & Bonds, A. (2018) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026118778175 · Cited by 147
Carceral feminisms: the abolitionist project and undoing dominant feminisms
Whalley, E., & Hackett, C. (2017) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2017.1383762 · Cited by 121
Prisons as porous institutions
Ellis, R. (2021) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09426-w · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Schept, J.
- Corresponding author
- Schept, Judah
- Venue
- New York University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- New York University Press
- Published
- 2015-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4393264268
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New York University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- mass incarceration, progressive politics, neoliberalism, liberal politics, rehabilitation, therapeutic justice, carceral state, Bloomington, Indiana, community organizing, deindustrialization, urban decline, tough on crime, prison expansion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review