The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space
Open accessAbstract
Learning Analytics is an emerging research field and design discipline that occupies the “middle space” between the learning sciences/educational research and the use of computational techniques to capture and analyze data (Suthers & Verbert, 2013). We propose that the literature examining the triadic relationships between epistemology (the nature of knowledge), pedagogy (the nature of learning and teaching), and assessment provide critical considerations for bounding this middle space. We provide examples to illustrate the ways in which the understandings of particular analytics are informed by this triad. As a detailed worked example of how one might design analytics to scaffold a specific form of higher order learning, we focus on the construct of epistemic beliefs: beliefs about the nature of knowledge. We argue that analytics grounded in a pragmatic, socio-cultural perspective are well placed to explore this construct using discourse-centric technologies. The examples provided throughout this paper, through emphasizing the consideration of intentional design issues in the middle space, underscore the “interpretative flexibility” (Hamilton & Feenberg, 2005) of new technologies, including analytics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Developing the theory of formative assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 · Cited by 3,301 · cited 1×
“…hold regarding knowledge Indeed, a key component of formative Assessment for Learning (AfL) may be the disambiguation of the epistemic requirements of questions – in terms of understanding the question, its context, and the knowledge required to answer the question (Black & Wiliam, 2009).”
BackgroundInformation searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy
Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2003) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/1355800032000038822 · Cited by 470
Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489 · Cited by 246
From Data to Insights: A Layered Storytelling Approach for Multimodal Learning Analytics
Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Fernandez Nieto, G., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376148 · Cited by 123
Cerratto Pargman, T., & McGrath, C. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.1 · Cited by 88
Van Leeuwen, A. (2015) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2015.22.11 · Cited by 84
Banihashem, S. K., Farrokhnia, M., Badali, M., & Noroozi, O. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1890634 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., & Littleton, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Analytics
- Published
- 2014-08-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1929-7750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1502638485
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18608/jla.2014.12.3
- The paper
- Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., & Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space. Journal of Learning Analytics. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.