Cited by 30Online Learning and AnalyticsArtificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mapping the Landscape of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Misiejuk, Kamila, López-Pernas, Sonsoles, Kaliisa, Rogers, Saqr, Mohammed·2025·Journal of Learning Analytics

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has opened new possibilities for designing learning analytics (LA) tools, gaining new insights about student learning processes and their environment, and supporting teachers in assessing and monitoring students. This systematic literature review maps the empirical research of 41 papers utilizing GenAI and LA and interprets the results through the lens of the LA/EDM process cycle. Currently, GenAI is mostly implemented to automate discourse coding, scoring, or classification tasks. Few papers used GenAI to generate data or to summarize text. Classroom integrations of GenAI and LA mostly explore facilitating human–GenAI collaboration, rather than implementing automated feedback generation or GenAI-powered learning analytics dashboards. Most papers use Generative Adversarial Network models to generate synthetic data, BERT models for classification or prediction tasks, BERT or GPT models for discourse coding, and GPT models for tool integration. Although most studies evaluate the GenAI output, we found examples of using GenAI without the output validation, especially when its output feeds into an LA pipeline aiming to, for example, develop a dashboard. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the field to aid LA researchers in the design of research studies and a contribution to establishing best practices to integrate GenAI and LA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18608/jla.2025.8591

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI is currently being used in learning analytics to automate discourse coding, generate synthetic data for training, and develop sophisticated dashboards.

    “As highlight in their systematic review, GenAI is currently being used to automate discourse coding, generate synthetic data for training, and develop sophisticated dashboards”
  • Evidence on the effectiveness of GenAI on actual learning is still lacking.

    “However, they also note that evidence on the effectiveness of GenAI on actual learning is still lacking.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Misiejuk, K., López-Pernas, S., Kaliisa, R., & Saqr, M.
Affiliations
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Venue
Journal of Learning Analytics
Published
2025-03-20
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
12-31
ISSN
1929-7750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408670199
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 4
FWCI
27.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Learning Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
generative AI, learning analytics, educational data mining, automated grading, student assessment, human-AI collaboration, learning analytics dashboards, synthetic data generation, generative adversarial networks, BERT, GPT, output validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review