Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis

Open access
Zhao, Hongli, Guo, Liyuan, Zhao, Hong, Zhao, Jiaxin, Weng, Hao, Zhao, Bin·2015·Oncotarget

Abstract

// Hongli Zhao 1,* , Liyuan Guo 2,* , Hong Zhao 1,* , Jiaxin Zhao 3 , Hao Weng 4 and Bin Zhao 5 1 Department of Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 2 Department of Gynecological Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 3 Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 4 Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai, China 5 Harbin Medical University, Daqing Campus, China * Authors contributed equally to this work and were co-first authors Correspondence: Bin Zhao, email: // Keywords : CXCR4, cancer, survival, prognostic biomarker, meta-analysis Received : November 23, 2014 Accepted : December 28, 2014 Published : December 31, 2014 Abstract C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is frequently over-expressed in various types of cancer; many agents against CXCR4 are in clinical development currently despite variable data for the prognostic impact of CXCR4 expression. Here eighty-five studies with a total of 11,032 subjects were included to explore the association between CXCR4 and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in subjects with cancer. Pooled analysis shows that CXCR4 over-expression is significantly associated with poorer PFS (HR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.72-2.42) and OS (HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.71-2.20) irrespective of cancer types. Subgroup analysis indicates significant association between CXCR4 and shorter PFS in hematological malignancy, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cancer, gynecologic cancer, pancreatic cancer and liver cancer; the prognostic effects remained consistent across age, risk of bias, levels of adjustment, median follow-up period, geographical area, detection methods, publication year and size of studies. CXCR4 over-expression predicts unfavorable OS in hematological malignancy, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer, renal cancer, lung cancer, gynecologic cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer and gallbladder cancer; these effects were independence of age, levels of adjustment, publication year, detection methods and follow-up period. In conclusion, CXCR4 over-expression is associated with poor prognosis in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.3217

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, H., Guo, L., Zhao, H., Zhao, J., Weng, H., & Zhao, B.
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2014-12-31
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
5022-5040
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1511246213
Cited by
274
References
68
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18632/oncotarget.3217
The paper
Zhao, H., Guo, L., Zhao, H., Zhao, J., Weng, H., & Zhao, B. (2015). CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3217

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.