The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
// Hongli Zhao 1,* , Liyuan Guo 2,* , Hong Zhao 1,* , Jiaxin Zhao 3 , Hao Weng 4 and Bin Zhao 5 1 Department of Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 2 Department of Gynecological Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 3 Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China 4 Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital South Campus, Shanghai, China 5 Harbin Medical University, Daqing Campus, China * Authors contributed equally to this work and were co-first authors Correspondence: Bin Zhao, email: // Keywords : CXCR4, cancer, survival, prognostic biomarker, meta-analysis Received : November 23, 2014 Accepted : December 28, 2014 Published : December 31, 2014 Abstract C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is frequently over-expressed in various types of cancer; many agents against CXCR4 are in clinical development currently despite variable data for the prognostic impact of CXCR4 expression. Here eighty-five studies with a total of 11,032 subjects were included to explore the association between CXCR4 and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in subjects with cancer. Pooled analysis shows that CXCR4 over-expression is significantly associated with poorer PFS (HR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.72-2.42) and OS (HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.71-2.20) irrespective of cancer types. Subgroup analysis indicates significant association between CXCR4 and shorter PFS in hematological malignancy, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cancer, gynecologic cancer, pancreatic cancer and liver cancer; the prognostic effects remained consistent across age, risk of bias, levels of adjustment, median follow-up period, geographical area, detection methods, publication year and size of studies. CXCR4 over-expression predicts unfavorable OS in hematological malignancy, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer, renal cancer, lung cancer, gynecologic cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer and gallbladder cancer; these effects were independence of age, levels of adjustment, publication year, detection methods and follow-up period. In conclusion, CXCR4 over-expression is associated with poor prognosis in cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 54,679
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
Stang, A. (2010) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z · Cited by 17,396
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.
Tierney, J. F., Stewart, L. A., Ghersi, D., Burdett, S., & Sydes, M. R. (2007) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-8-16 · Cited by 6,208
VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche
Kaplan, R. N., Riba, R. D., Zacharoulis, S., Bramley, A. H., Vincent, L., Costa, C., MacDonald, D. D., Jin, D. K., Shido, K., Kerns, S. A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04186 · Cited by 3,288
Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: a systematic review
Lippitz, B. E. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70582-x · Cited by 905
Cited by
Bhattarai, S., Mackeyev, Y., Venkatesulu, B. P., Krishnan, S., & Singh, P. K. (2021) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d1nr05385j · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Guo, L., Zhao, H., Zhao, J., Weng, H., & Zhao, B.
- Venue
- Oncotarget
- Publisher
- Impact Journals, LLC
- Published
- 2014-12-31
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5022-5040
- ISSN
- 1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1511246213
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18632/oncotarget.3217
- The paper
- Zhao, H., Guo, L., Zhao, H., Zhao, J., Weng, H., & Zhao, B. (2015). CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.