Cited by 71Cancer Cells and MetastasisCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Regression of metastatic melanoma by targeting cancer stem cells

Open access
Schlaak, Max, Schmidt, Patrick, Bangard, Christopher, Kurschat, Peter, Mauch, Cornelia, Abken, Hinrich·2012·Oncotarget

Abstract

Max Schlaak 1,* , Patrick Schmidt 2,*,+ , Christopher Bangard 3 , Peter Kurschat 1 , Cornelia Mauch 1,4 , and Hinrich Abken 2,4 1 Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Skin Cancer Center at the Center for Integrated Oncology 2 Tumorgenetics, Department I of Internal Medicine 3 Institute for Radiological Diagnostics 4 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, D-50931 Cologne, Germany + Present Address: Cancer Stem Cell Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland * Denotes equal contribution Received: January 21, 2012; Accepted: January 25, 2012; Published: January 28, 2012; Keywords: cancer stem cell, melanoma, CD20, rituximab Correspondence: Hinrich Abken, email: // // Abstract Current therapeutic regimens attempt to eliminate all malignant cells of a melanoma lesion; pre-clinical data, however, indicate that melanoma, once established, is maintained by a minor, non-random subset of cancer cells which are characterized by CD20 expression. We asked to eliminate those cells in a progressing, chemotherapy-refractory metastatic melanoma patient by lesional injections of the anti-CD20 therapeutic antibody rituximab and concomitant low dose systemic dacarbazine treatment. Although the frequencies of CD20 + melanoma cells within the tumor lesions were initially about 2% and the bulk of tumor cells did not express CD20, rituximab treatment produced lasting remission of treated tumor lesions in the long-term. Remission was accompanied by a decline of the melanoma serum marker S-100 to physiological levels. Detailed in-depth-analyses revealed a switch of serum cytokines from a T helper-2 to a pro-inflammatory T helper-1 cell profile. Apart from B cell elimination and decline in gammaglobulin levels, no grade 3/4 toxicity related to treatment was observed. Data provide the first clinical evidence that targeting the minor subset of CD20 + "melanoma sustaining cells" produces regression of chemotherapy-refractory melanoma and highlight the potency of selective cancer cell targeting in the treatment of melanoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.437

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Trcka J Kämpgen E Becker JC Schwaaf A Bröcker EB [Immunochemotherapy of malignant melanoma. Epifocal administration of dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) combined with systemic chemotherapy with dacarbazine (DTIC)] Hautarzt 1998 49 17 22 9522188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlaak, M., Schmidt, P., Bangard, C., Kurschat, P., Mauch, C., & Abken, H.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Schlaak, Max
  • Schmidt, Patrick
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2012-01-28
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
22-30
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W560463957
Cited by
71
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Oncotarget (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
metastatic melanoma, cancer stem cells, CD20, rituximab, dacarbazine, tumor regression, S-100 protein, serum cytokines, B cell elimination
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Aged, Antibodies, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dacarbazine, Foot, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Remission Induction, Skin Neoplasms, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Tumor Burden, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review