Cited by 361Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingData Analysis with R

blavaan : Bayesian Structural Equation Models via Parameter Expansion

Open access
Merkle, Edgar C., Rosseel, Yves·2018·Journal of Statistical Software

Abstract

This article describes blavaan, an R package for estimating Bayesian structural equation models (SEMs) via JAGS and for summarizing the results. It also describes a novel parameter expansion approach for estimating specific types of models with residual covariances, which facilitates estimation of these models in JAGS. The methodology and software are intended to provide users with a general means of estimating Bayesian SEMs, both classical and novel, in a straightforward fashion. Users can estimate Bayesian versions of classical SEMs with lavaan syntax, they can obtain state-of-the-art Bayesian fit measures associated with the models, and they can export JAGS code to modify the SEMs as desired. These features and more are illustrated by example, and the parameter expansion approach is explained in detail.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18637/jss.v085.i04

Cites

45 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Missing data were addressed using the default full information procedure in blavaan.

    “Missing data were addressed by utilizing the default full information procedure implemented in blavaan (Merkle & Rosseel, Citation2018).”

    From How do care-related beliefs contribute to depression and anxiety in family caregivers of people with dementia? Testing a cognitive vulnerability-stress model. (2025) · cites this paper as Merkle & Rosseel, 2018

    The Posterior predictive checks section discusses difficulties calculating a fit statistic when data are missing, but does not describe a default full-information procedure for handling missing data in model estimation. Searches for “full information maximum likelihood,” “FIML,” and missing-observation handling found no passage establishing the claimed default. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beaujean AA (2014). Latent Variable Modeling Using R. Routledge, New York.
  2. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall, London.
  3. see, e.g., Kass and Raftery (1995) and Rouder, Morey, Verhagen, Province, and Wagenmakers (2016). Affiliation: Edgar C. Merkle Department of Psychological Sciences University of Missouri 28A McAlester Hall Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America E-mail: merklee@missouri.edu URL: http://faculty.missouri.edu/~merklee/ Journal of Statistical Software http://www.jstatsoft.org/ published by the Foundation for Open Access Statistics http://www.foastat.org/ June 2018, Volume 85, Issue 4 Submitted: 2015-11-17 doi:10.18637/jss.v085.i04 Accepted: 2017-01-31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merkle, E. C., & Rosseel, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Journal of Statistical Software
Published
2018
Volume
85
Issue
4
ISSN
1548-7660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177847511
Cited by
360
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
30.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Statistical Software (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1061334, 1460719)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
Keywords
Bayesian structural equation models, parameter expansion, residual covariance, JAGS, R package, model estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review