Cited by 15Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTopic Modeling

Visual Question Generation from Radiology Images

Open access
Sarrouti, Mourad, Ben Abacha, Asma, Demner-Fushman, Dina·2020·Proceedings of the First Workshop on Advances in Language and Vision Research

Abstract

Visual Question Generation (VQG), the task of generating a question based on image contents, is an increasingly important area that combines natural language processing and computer vision.Although there are some recent works that have attempted to generate questions from images in the open domain, the task of VQG in the medical domain has not been explored so far.In this paper, we introduce an approach to generation of visual questions about radiology images called VQGR, i.e. an algorithm that is able to ask a question when shown an image.VQGR first generates new training data from the existing examples, based on contextual word embeddings and image augmentation techniques.It then uses the variational auto-encoders model to encode images into a latent space and decode natural language questions.Experimental automatic evaluations performed on the VQA-RAD dataset of clinical visual questions show that VQGR achieves good performances compared with the baseline system.The source code is available at https://github.com/ sarrouti/vqgr.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.alvr-1.3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Saidalavi Kalady, Ajeesh Elikkottil, and Rajarshi Das. 2010. Natural language question generation using syntax and keywords. In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, volume 2, pages 5-14.
  2. Issey Masuda-Mora, Santiago Pascual-deLaPuente, and Xavier Giró i Nieto. 2016. Towards automatic generation of question answer pairs from images. In Visual Question Answering Challenge Workshop, CVPR 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarrouti, M., Ben Abacha, A., & Demner-Fushman, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Advances in Language and Vision Research
Published
2020
Pages
12-18
OpenAlex
W3045951017
Cited by
15
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Workshop on Advances in Language and Vision Research (ALVR) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
visual question generation, radiographic images, variational autoencoder, image-to-text generation, image augmentation, contextual word embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review