Cited by 59Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Length-Adaptive Transformer: Train Once with Length Drop, Use Anytime with Search

Open access
Kim, Gyuwan, Cho, Kyunghyun·2021·Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Gyuwan Kim, Kyunghyun Cho. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.508

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Token pruning and token merging methods need model fine-tuning or intermediate results during inference and have been used with BERT-scale models.

    “(1) Token pruning (Goyal et al., 2020; Kim and Cho, 2021; Modarressi et al., 2022) and token merging (Bolya et al., 2023), which need model fine-tuning or intermediate results during inference and have been used with BERT-scale models.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Joshua Ainslie, Santiago Ontanón, Chris Alberti, Va- clav Cvicek, Zachary Fisher, Philip Pham, Anirudh Ravula, Sumit Sanghai, Qifan Wang, and Li Yang. 2020. Etc: Encoding long and structured inputs in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08483. · arXiv
  2. Iz Beltagy, Matthew E Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020. Longformer: The long-document transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05150. · arXiv
  3. Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. · arXiv
  4. Han Cai, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. 2019. Once for all: Train one network and specialize it for efficient deployment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09791. · arXiv
  5. Qingqing Cao, Aruna Balasubramanian, and Niranjan Balasubramanian. 2020. Towards accurate and re- liable energy measurement of nlp models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.05248. · arXiv
  6. Ting-Wu Chin, Ruizhou Ding, Cha Zhang, and Diana Marculescu. 2020. Towards efficient model com- pression via learned global ranking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1518-1528.
  7. Zihang Dai, Guokun Lai, Yiming Yang, and Quoc V Le. 2020. Funnel-transformer: Filtering out sequential redundancy for efficient language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03236. · arXiv
  8. Maha Elbayad, Jiatao Gu, Edouard Grave, and Michael Auli. 2019. Depth-adaptive transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10073. · arXiv
  9. Angela Fan, Edouard Grave, and Armand Joulin. 2019. Reducing transformer depth on demand with struc- tured dropout. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11556. · arXiv
  10. Saurabh Goyal, Anamitra Roy Choudhury, Saurabh Raje, Venkatesan Chakaravarthy, Yogish Sabharwal, and Ashish Verma. 2020. Power-bert: Accelerat- ing bert inference via progressive word-vector elim- ination. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3690-3699. PMLR.
  11. Song Han, Huizi Mao, and William J Dally. 2015. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural net- works with pruning, trained quantization and huff- man coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00149. · arXiv
  12. Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2020. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654. · arXiv
  13. Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. 2015. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531. · arXiv
  14. Gao Huang, Danlu Chen, Tianhong Li, Felix Wu, Laurens van der Maaten, and Kilian Q Wein- berger. 2017. Multi-scale dense networks for re- source efficient image classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09844. · arXiv
  15. Gao Huang, Yu Sun, Zhuang Liu, Daniel Sedra, and Kilian Q Weinberger. 2016. Deep networks with stochastic depth. In European conference on com- puter vision, pages 646-661. Springer.
  16. Nikita Kitaev, Łukasz Kaiser, and Anselm Levskaya. 2020. Reformer: The efficient transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04451. · arXiv
  17. Hankook Lee and Jinwoo Shin. 2018. Anytime neu- ral prediction via slicing networks vertically. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02609. · arXiv
  18. Xiaonan Li, Yunfan Shao, Tianxiang Sun, Hang Yan, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2021. Acceler- ating bert inference for sequence labeling via early- exit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13878. · arXiv
  19. Zhuohan Li, Eric Wallace, Sheng Shen, Kevin Lin, Kurt Keutzer, Dan Klein, and Joseph E Gonzalez. 2020. Train large, then compress: Rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transform- ers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11794. · arXiv
  20. Weijie Liu, Peng Zhou, Zhe Zhao, Zhiruo Wang, Haotang Deng, and Qi Ju. 2020a. Fastbert: a self- distilling bert with adaptive inference time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02178. · arXiv
  21. Yijin Liu, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Yufeng Chen, and Jinan Xu. 2020b. Explicitly modeling adap- tive depths for transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13542. · arXiv
  22. Paul Michel, Omer Levy, and Graham Neubig. 2019. Are sixteen heads really better than one? In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 14014-14024.
  23. Hao Peng, Nikolaos Pappas, Dani Yogatama, Roy Schwartz, Noah A Smith, and Lingpeng Kong. 2021. Random feature attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02143. · arXiv
  24. Matthew E Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word repre- sentations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365. · arXiv
  25. Ofir Press, Noah A Smith, and Mike Lewis. 2020. Shortformer: Better language modeling using shorter inputs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15832. · arXiv
  26. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8):9.
  27. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250. · arXiv
  28. Esteban Real, Alok Aggarwal, Yanping Huang, and Quoc V Le. 2019. Regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search. In Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence, volume 33, pages 4780-4789.
  29. Oren Rippel, Michael Gelbart, and Ryan Adams. 2014. Learning ordered representations with nested dropout. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1746-1754.
  30. Roy Schwartz, Gabi Stanovsky, Swabha Swayamdipta, Jesse Dodge, and Noah A Smith. 2020. The right tool for the job: Matching model and instance com- plexities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07453. · arXiv
  31. Abigail See, Minh-Thang Luong, and Christopher D Manning. 2016. Compression of neural machine translation models via pruning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09274. · arXiv
  32. Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, Raul Puri, Patrick LeGresley, Jared Casper, and Bryan Catan- zaro. 2019. Megatron-lm: Training multi-billion parameter language models using gpu model paral- lelism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08053. · arXiv
  33. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research, 15(1):1929-1958.
  34. Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew Mc- Callum. 2019. Energy and policy considera- tions for deep learning in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02243. · arXiv
  35. Sandeep Subramanian, Ronan Collobert, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2020. Multi-scale transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00581. · arXiv
  36. Siqi Sun, Yu Cheng, Zhe Gan, and Jingjing Liu. 2019. Patient knowledge distillation for bert model com- pression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09355. · arXiv
  37. Nako Sung, Minkyu Kim, Hyunwoo Jo, Youngil Yang, Jingwoong Kim, Leonard Lausen, Youngkwan Kim, Gayoung Lee, Donghyun Kwak, Jung-Woo Ha, et al. 2017. Nsml: A machine learning platform that en- ables you to focus on your models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05902. · arXiv
  38. Raphael Tang, Ashutosh Adhikari, and Jimmy Lin. 2018. Flops as a direct optimization objective for learning sparse neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03060. · arXiv
  39. Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Samira Abnar, Yikang Shen, Dara Bahri, Philip Pham, Jinfeng Rao, Liu Yang, Sebastian Ruder, and Donald Metzler. 2020a. Long range arena: A benchmark for efficient trans- formers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04006. · arXiv
  40. Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Dara Bahri, and Donald Metzler. 2020b. Efficient transformers: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06732. · arXiv
  41. Surat Teerapittayanon, Bradley McDanel, and Hsiang- Tsung Kung. 2016. Branchynet: Fast inference via early exiting from deep neural networks. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recogni- tion (ICPR), pages 2464-2469. IEEE.
  42. Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Fran- cisco Massa, Alexandre Sablayrolles, and Hervé Jégou. 2020. Training data-efficient image trans- formers & distillation through attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12877. · arXiv
  43. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, pages 5998-6008.
  44. Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R Bowman. 2018. Glue: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461. · arXiv
  45. Hanrui Wang, Zhanghao Wu, Zhijian Liu, Han Cai, Ligeng Zhu, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. 2020a. Hat: Hardware-aware transformers for ef- ficient natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14187. · arXiv
  46. Hanrui Wang, Zhekai Zhang, and Song Han. 2020b. Spatten: Efficient sparse attention architecture with cascade token and head pruning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09852. · arXiv
  47. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pier- ric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Fun- towicz, et al. 2019. Transformers: State-of-the- art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771. · arXiv
  48. Ji Xin, Raphael Tang, Jaejun Lee, Yaoliang Yu, and Jimmy Lin. 2020. Deebert: Dynamic early exit- ing for accelerating bert inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.12993. · arXiv
  49. Ji Xin, Raphael Tang, Yaoliang Yu, and Jimmy Lin. 2021. Berxit: Early exiting for bert with better fine-tuning and extension to regression. In Proceed- ings of the 16th Conference of the European Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 91-104.
  50. Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime Car- bonell, Russ R Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V Le. 2019. Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. In Advances in neural in- formation processing systems, pages 5754-5764.
  51. Deming Ye, Yankai Lin, Yufei Huang, and Maosong Sun. 2021. Tr-bert: Dynamic token reduction for accelerating bert inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11618. · arXiv
  52. Jiahui Yu and Thomas S Huang. 2019. Universally slimmable networks and improved training tech- niques. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1803-1811.
  53. Jiahui Yu, Linjie Yang, Ning Xu, Jianchao Yang, and Thomas Huang. 2018. Slimmable neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08928. · arXiv
  54. Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie, Chris Alberti, Santiago Ontanon, Philip Pham, Anirudh Ravula, Qifan Wang, Li Yang, et al. 2020. Big bird: Transformers for longer se- quences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14062. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, G., & Cho, K.
Affiliations
  • Naver (South Korea) (KR)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2021
Pages
6501-6511
OpenAlex
W3174708387
Cited by
59
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review