Cited by 3,150Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognition

Open access
Gulati, Anmol, Qin, James, Chiu, Chung-Cheng, Parmar, Niki, Zhang, Yu, Yu, Jiahui, Han, Wei, Wang, Shibo +3 more·2020·Interspeech 2020

Abstract

Recently Transformer and Convolution neural network (CNN) based models have shown promising results in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), outperforming Recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Transformer models are good at capturing content-based global interactions, while CNNs exploit local features effectively. In this work, we achieve the best of both worlds by studying how to combine convolution neural networks and transformers to model both local and global dependencies of an audio sequence in a parameter-efficient way. To this regard, we propose the convolution-augmented transformer for speech recognition, named Conformer. Conformer significantly outperforms the previous Transformer and CNN based models achieving state-of-the-art accuracies. On the widely used LibriSpeech benchmark, our model achieves WER of 2.1%/4.3% without using a language model and 1.9%/3.9% with an external language model on test/testother. We also observe competitive performance of 2.7%/6.3% with a small model of only 10M parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2020-3015

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformer and recurrent neural-network transducer models containing up to one billion parameters have produced a marked decrease in word error rate for automated transcription of spoken English-language sentences.

    “In particular, transformer1 and recurrent neural-network transducer (RNNT)12,13,16 models containing up to one billion parameters2 have produced a marked decrease in word error rate (WER) (and therefore much better accuracy) for the automated transcription of spoken English-language sentences, as shown in Fig. 1a for two widely used datasets, Librispeech17 and SwitchBoard18.”
  • The chosen baseline acoustic models (hybrid DNN, hybrid LF-MMI TDNN, and E2E Conformer) give state-of-the-art performance on the four tasks.

    “A range of acoustic models that give state-of-the-art performance on these tasks are chosen as the baseline speech recognition systems, including hybrid DNN [41], hybrid lattice-free maximum mutual information (LF-MMI) trained time delay neural network (TDNN) [3] and end-to-end (E2E) Conformer [6] models.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulati, A., Qin, J., Chiu, C.-C., Parmar, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Han, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., & Pang, R.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Interspeech 2020
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2020-10-25
Pages
5036-5040
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097777922
Cited by
3,150
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 373 · 2025: 666 · 2024: 644 · 2023: 708 · 2022: 424 · 2021: 300 · 2020: 35
FWCI
140.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
conformational isomers, speech recognition, CNN-Transformer hybrid, parameter-efficient models, LibriSpeech, word error rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review