Cited by 70Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation

Open access
Liu, Tianyu, Zhang, Yizhe, Brockett, Chris, Mao, Yi, Sui, Zhifang, Chen, Weizhu, Dolan, Bill·2022·Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Tianyu Liu, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Yi Mao, Zhifang Sui, Weizhu Chen, Bill Dolan. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.464

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. (2022) introduce a hallucination detection dataset, but texts are obtained by perturbing factual texts and thus may not reflect true LLM hallucination.

    “Further, Liu et al. (2022) introduce a hallucination detection dataset, however, texts are obtained by perturbing factual texts and thus may not reflect true LLM hallucination.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  2. Rong Ye, Wenxian Shi, Hao Zhou, Zhongyu Wei, and Lei Li. 2020. Variational template machine for data- to-text generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Brockett, C., Mao, Y., Sui, Z., Chen, W., & Dolan, B.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2022
Pages
6723-6737
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155332104
Cited by
63
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19A2065)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
hallucination detection, reference-free evaluation, large language models, benchmark design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review