Cited by 52Topic ModelingAdvanced Text Analysis TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

SummScreen: A Dataset for Abstractive Screenplay Summarization

Open access
Chen, Mingda, Chu, Zewei, Wiseman, Sam, Gimpel, Kevin·2022·Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

We introduce SUMMSCREEN, a summarization dataset comprised of pairs of TV series transcripts and human written recaps.The dataset provides a challenging testbed for abstractive summarization for several reasons.Plot details are often expressed indirectly in character dialogues and may be scattered across the entirety of the transcript.These details must be found and integrated to form the succinct plot descriptions in the recaps.Also, TV scripts contain content that does not directly pertain to the central plot but rather serves to develop characters or provide comic relief.This information is rarely contained in recaps.Since characters are fundamental to TV series, we also propose two entity-centric evaluation metrics.Empirically, we characterize the dataset by evaluating several methods, including neural models and those based on nearest neighbors.An oracle extractive approach outperforms all benchmarked models according to automatic metrics, showing that the neural models are unable to fully exploit the input transcripts.Human evaluation and qualitative analysis reveal that our nonoracle models are competitive with their oracle counterparts in terms of generating faithful plot events and can benefit from better content selectors.Both oracle and non-oracle models generate unfaithful facts, suggesting future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.589

Cites

52 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 2 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Summ-Screen is an abstractive summarization dataset combining TV series transcripts and episode recaps, constructed from fan-contributed websites.

    “The original dataset is an abstractive summarization dataset combining TV series transcripts and episode recaps, constructed from fan-contributed websites.”

    From L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2022

  • Events in LOCOMO are densely annotated lists of life events that are hard to summarize due to temporal and causal coreferences present in the dialogues.

    “The events in LOCOMO are densely annotated lists of life events that are hard to summarize due to temporal and causal coreferences present in the dialogues, in contrast to existing summarization benchmarks of research papers (Li et al., 2023a), movie scripts (Chen et al., 2022), books (Kry´ sci´ nski et al., 2022), emails (Zhang et al., 2021b) etc.”

    From Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2022

  • SummScreen is an abstractive summarization dataset combining TV series transcripts and episode recaps, constructed from fan-contributed websites.

    “This dataset originates from the SummScreen (Chen et al., 2022), the original dataset is an abstractive summarization dataset combining TV series transcripts and episode recaps.SummScreen is constructed from fan-contributed websites.”

    From L-Eval: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Long Context Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., Chu, Z., Wiseman, S., & Gimpel, K.
Affiliations
  • Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2022
Pages
8602-8615
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3153603860
Cited by
46
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9
FWCI
4.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
abstractive summarization, screenplays, content selection, character speech, summarization datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review