Cited by 12Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationNatural Language Processing Techniques

Learning to Ask Like a Physician

Open access
Lehman, Eric, Lialin, Vladislav, Legaspi, Katelyn Edelwina, Sy, Anne Janelle, Pile, Patricia Therese, Alberto, Nicole Rose, Ragasa, Richard Raymund, Puyat, Corinna Victoria +10 more·2022·Proceedings of the 4th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop

Abstract

Eric Lehman, Vladislav Lialin, Katelyn Edelwina Legaspi, Anne Janelle Sy, Patricia Therese Pile, Nicole Rose Alberto, Richard Raymund Ragasa, Corinna Victoria Puyat, Marianne Katharina Taliño, Isabelle Rose Alberto, Pia Gabrielle Alfonso, Dana Moukheiber, Byron Wallace, Anna Rumshisky, Jennifer Liang, Preethi Raghavan, Leo Anthony Celi, Peter Szolovits. Proceedings of the 4th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop. 2022.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.clinicalnlp-1.8

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yllias Chali and Sadid A. Hasan. 2015. Towards topicto-question generation. Computational Linguistics , 41(1):1-20.
  2. Simon Suster and Walter Daelemans. 2018. Clicr: a dataset of clinical case reports for machine reading comprehension. In NAACL .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehman, E., Lialin, V., Legaspi, K. E., Sy, A. J., Pile, P. T., Alberto, N. R., Ragasa, R. R., Puyat, C. V., Taliño, M. K., Alberto, I. R., Alfonso, P. G., Moukheiber, D., Wallace, B., Rumshisky, A., Liang, J., Raghavan, P., Celi, L. A., & Szolovits, P.
Affiliations
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • University of the Philippines System (PH)
  • University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center (PH)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop
Published
2022
Pages
74-86
OpenAlex
W4287889097
Cited by
10
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
10.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
medical question answering, clinical natural language processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review