Cited by 40Speech and dialogue systemsMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

MMDialog: A Large-scale Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset Towards Multi-modal Open-domain Conversation

Open access
Feng, Jiazhan, Sun, Qingfeng, Xu, Can, Zhao, Pu, Yang, Yaming, Tao, Chongyang, Zhao, Dongyan, Lin, Qingwei·2023·Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Jiazhan Feng, Qingfeng Sun, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Yaming Yang, Chongyang Tao, Dongyan Zhao, Qingwei Lin. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.405

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies have utilized LLMs to augment or synthesize large-scale dialogue benchmarks for assessing responses in everyday social interactions, multi-modal environments, and persona-aligned responses.

    “Consequently, numerous studies have started utilizing LLMs to augment or synthesize large-scale dialogue benchmarks for assessing responses in everyday social interactions (Kim et al., 2023), examining responses in multi-modal environment (Feng et al., 2023), and evaluating responses that align with specific persona (Jandaghi et al., 2023).”

    From Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Feng et al., 2023

    The Contributions section describes MMDialog as a million-scale multimodal dialogue dataset with generation and retrieval benchmark tasks, supporting the multimodal-benchmark part of the citation. Section 3, “Dialogue Creation” (page unavailable), says the dialogues were collected from social media, not augmented or synthesized using LLMs. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Abhishek Das, Satwik Kottur, Khushi Gupta, Avi Singh, Deshraj Yadav, José MF Moura, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Visual dialog. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 326-335.
  2. Jiazhan Feng, Chongyang Tao, Zhen Li, Chang Liu, Tao Shen, and Dongyan Zhao. 2022. Reciprocal learn- ing of knowledge retriever and response ranker for knowledge-grounded conversations. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, pages 389-399, Gyeongju, Repub- lic of Korea. International Committee on Computa- tional Linguistics.
  3. PMLR.
  4. PMLR.
  5. D2. Did you report information about how you recruited (e.g., crowdsourcing platform, students) and paid participants, and discuss if such payment is adequate given the participants' demographic (e.g., country of residence)? Section 6.3 and they are volunteers. D3. Did you discuss whether and how consent was obtained from people whose data you're using/curating? For example, if you collected data via crowdsourcing, did your instructions to crowdworkers explain how the data would be used? Section 3, Section 4, Section 6.3 and Ethics Statement D4. Was the data collection protocol approved (or determined exempt) by an ethics review board? Section 3, Section 4, Section 6.3 and Ethics Statement D5. Did you report the basic demographic and geographic characteristics of the annotator population that is the source of the data? Section 3, Section 4, Section 6.3 and Ethics Statement

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, J., Sun, Q., Xu, C., Zhao, P., Yang, Y., Tao, C., Zhao, D., & Lin, Q.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2023
Pages
7348-7363
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385571466
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
multi-turn dialogue, open-domain conversation, dialogue dataset, multimodal interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review