Cited by 2Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesLanguage Development and Disorders

CLIMB – Curriculum Learning for Infant-inspired Model Building

Open access
Martinez, Richard Diehl, McGovern, Hope, Goriely, Zebulon, Davis, Christopher, Caines, Andrew, Buttery, Paula, Beinborn, Lisa·2023·Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Abstract

Richard Diehl Martinez, Zébulon Goriely, Hope McGovern, Christopher Davis, Andrew Caines, Paula Buttery, Lisa Beinborn. Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.10

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Yoshua Bengio, Jérôme Louradour, Ronan Collobert, and Jason Weston. 2009. Curriculum learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 41-48.
  2. Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit . " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
  3. Xiaoxia Wu, Ethan Dyer, and Behnam Neyshabur. 2021. When do curricula work? In International Conference on Learning Representations .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, R. D., McGovern, H., Goriely, Z., Davis, C., Caines, A., Buttery, P., & Beinborn, L.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Published
2023
Pages
84-99
OpenAlex
W4389518616
Cited by
2
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BabyLM Challenge (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1144)
  • Dell EMC
  • University of Cambridge
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VI.Veni.211C.039)
  • Cambridge Trust
  • Gates Cambridge Trust (#OPP1144)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (OPP1144, EP/T022159/, EP/T022159/1)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
curriculum learning, language acquisition, computational natural language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review