Cited by 4Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

Nano: Nested Human-in-the-Loop Reward Learning for Few-shot Language Model Control

Open access
Fan, Xiang, Lyu, Yiwei, Liang, Paul Pu, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Morency, Louis-Philippe·2023·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023

Abstract

Pretrained language models have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in language generation.However, real-world tasks often require controlling the distribution of generated text in order to mitigate bias, promote fairness, and achieve personalization.Existing techniques for controlling the distribution of generated text only work with quantified distributions, which require pre-defined categories, proportions of the distribution, or an existing corpus following the desired distributions.However, many important distributions, such as personal preferences, are unquantified.In this work, we tackle the problem of generating text following arbitrary distributions (quantified and unquantified) by proposing NANO, a fewshot human-in-the-loop training algorithm that continuously learns from human feedback.NANO achieves state-of-the-art results on single topic/attribute as well as quantified distribution control compared to previous works.We also show that NANO is able to learn unquantified distributions, achieves personalization, and captures differences between different individuals' personal preferences with high sample efficiency.Our code is available at https: //github.com/sfanxiang/Nano.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.758

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Braden Hancock, Antoine Bordes, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré, and Jason Weston. 2019. Learning from dialogue after deployment: Feed yourself, chatbot! In ACL.
  2. Guillaume Lample, Sandeep Subramanian, Eric Smith, Ludovic Denoyer, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, and Y- Lan Boureau. 2019. Multiple-attribute text rewrit- ing. In International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations.
  3. Paul Pu Liang, Irene Mengze Li, Emily Zheng, Yao Chong Lim, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Louis- Philippe Morency. 2020. Towards debiasing sen- tence representations. In Proceedings of the 58th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5502-5515.
  4. Wei Xu, Alan Ritter, Bill Dolan, Ralph Grishman, and Colin Cherry. 2012. Paraphrasing for style. In Pro- ceedings of COLING 2012, pages 2899-2914.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, X., Lyu, Y., Liang, P. P., Salakhutdinov, R., & Morency, L.-P.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
Published
2023
Pages
11970-11992
OpenAlex
W4385570669
Cited by
3
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1750439, 1722822)
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH096951, U01MH116925, R01MH125740)
  • Center for Machine Learning and Health, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
human-in-the-loop learning, reward learning, distribution control, personalization, individual preferences, fairness, sample efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review