The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning
Open accessAbstract
Model editing aims to correct outdated or erroneous knowledge in large language models (LLMs) without the need for costly retraining.Lifelong model editing is the most challenging task that caters to the continuous editing requirements of LLMs.Prior works primarily focus on single or batch editing; nevertheless, these methods fall short in lifelong editing scenarios due to catastrophic knowledge forgetting and the degradation of model performance.Although retrieval-based methods alleviate these issues, they are impeded by slow and cumbersome processes of integrating the retrieved knowledge into the model.In this work, we introduce RECIPE, a RetriEval-augmented ContInuous Prompt lEarning method, to boost editing efficacy and inference efficiency in lifelong learning.RECIPE first converts knowledge statements into short and informative continuous prompts, prefixed to the LLM's input query embedding, to efficiently refine the response grounded on the knowledge.It further integrates the Knowledge Sentinel (KS) that acts as an intermediary to calculate a dynamic threshold, determining whether the retrieval repository contains relevant knowledge.Our retriever and prompt encoder are jointly trained to achieve editing properties, i.e., reliability, generality, and locality.In our experiments, RECIPE is assessed extensively across multiple LLMs and editing datasets, where it achieves superior editing performance.RECIPE also demonstrates its capability to maintain the overall performance of LLMs alongside showcasing fast editing and inference speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The latest efforts in lifelong editing such as LTE [66], MALMEN [15], and RECIPE [67] require extensive training with domain-specific edits before specific editing”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Nicola De Cao, Wilker Aziz, and Ivan Titov. 2021. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In EMNLP, pages 6491-6506. · DOI · Paper page
- Qi Chen, Bing Zhao, Haidong Wang, Mingqin Li, Chuanjie Liu, Zengzhong Li, Mao Yang, and Jing- dong Wang. 2021. SPANN: highly-efficient billion- scale approximate nearest neighborhood search. In NeurIPS, pages 5199-5212.
- Roi Cohen, Eden Biran, Ori Yoran, Amir Globerson, and Mor Geva. 2023. Evaluating the ripple effects of knowledge editing in language models. CoRR, abs/2307.12976. · arXiv
- Qingxiu Dong, Damai Dai, Yifan Song, Jingjing Xu, Zhifang Sui, and Lei Li. 2022. Calibrating fac- tual knowledge in pretrained language models. In EMNLP, pages 5937-5947. · DOI · Paper page
- Haonan Duan, Adam Dziedzic, Nicolas Papernot, and Franziska Boenisch. 2023. Flocks of stochastic par- rots: Differentially private prompt learning for large language models. In NeurIPS.
- Tianyu Gao, Adam Fisch, and Danqi Chen. 2021. Making pre-trained language models better few-shot learners. In ACL, pages 3816-3830. · DOI · Paper page
- Xiaoqi Han, Ru Li, Hongye Tan, Yuanlong Wang, Qinghua Chai, and Jeff Z. Pan. 2023. Improving se- quential model editing with fact retrieval. In EMNLP, pages 11209-11224.
- Thomas Hartvigsen, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Hamid Palangi, Yoon Kim, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2022. Aging with GRACE: lifelong model editing with dis- crete key-value adaptors. CoRR, abs/2211.11031. · arXiv
- Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross B. Girshick. 2020. Momentum contrast for un- supervised visual representation learning. In CVPR, pages 9726-9735. · DOI · Paper page
- Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recogni- tion. In CVPR, pages 770-778. · DOI · Paper page
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring massive multitask language under- standing. In ICLR.
- Chenhui Hu, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2024. Wilke: Wise-layer knowl- edge editor for lifelong knowledge editing. CoRR, abs/2402.10987. · arXiv
- Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR.
- Zeyu Huang, Yikang Shen, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jie Zhou, Wenge Rong, and Zhang Xiong. 2023. Transformer- patcher: One mistake worth one neuron. In ICLR.
- Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, and Wei Wang. 2024. Learning to edit: Aligning llms with knowledge editing. CoRR, abs/2402.11905. · arXiv
- Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Scaling laws for neural language models. CoRR, abs/2001.08361. · arXiv
- Itay Levy, Ben Bogin, and Jonathan Berant. 2023. Di- verse demonstrations improve in-context composi- tional generalization. In ACL, pages 1401-1422. · DOI · Paper page
- Omer Levy, Minjoon Seo, Eunsol Choi, and Luke Zettle- moyer. 2017. Zero-shot relation extraction via read- ing comprehension. In CoNLL, pages 333-342. · DOI · Paper page
- Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. BART: denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and com- prehension. In ACL, pages 7871-7880. · DOI · Paper page
- Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang. 2021. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In ACL, pages 4582-4597. · DOI · Paper page
- Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Zhengxiao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2021a. P-tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks. CoRR, abs/2110.07602. · arXiv
- Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Weng Tam, Zhengx- iao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2022. P-tuning: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks. In ACL, pages 61-68. · DOI · Paper page
- Xiao Liu, Yanan Zheng, Zhengxiao Du, Ming Ding, Yujie Qian, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2021b. GPT understands, too. CoRR, abs/2103.10385. · arXiv
- Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Man- dar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. CoRR, abs/1907.11692. · arXiv
- Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. Locating and editing factual associa- tions in GPT. In NeurIPS.
- Kevin Meng, Arnab Sen Sharma, Alex J. Andonian, Yonatan Belinkov, and David Bau. 2023. Mass- editing memory in a transformer. In ICLR.
- Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yizhong Wang, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Fine-grained halluci- nation detection and editing for language models. CoRR, abs/2401.06855. · arXiv
- Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D. Manning. 2022. Fast model editing at scale. In ICLR.
- Jesse Mu, Xiang Li, and Noah D. Goodman. 2023. Learning to compress prompts with gist tokens. In NeurIPS.
- Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Adversarial NLI: A new benchmark for natural language under- standing. In ACL, pages 4885-4901. · DOI · Paper page
- Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexander H. Miller. 2019. Language models as knowledge bases? In EMNLP, pages 2463-2473. · DOI · Paper page
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018. Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for squad. In ACL, pages 784-789.
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100, 000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In EMNLP, pages 2383-2392. · DOI · Paper page
- Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In EMNLP, pages 3980-3990. · DOI · Paper page
- Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis and Nikolaos D. Tselikas. 2023. Chatgpt and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6):192. · DOI
- Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019. Commonsenseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowl- edge. In NAACL, pages 4149-4158. · DOI
- Chenmien Tan, Ge Zhang, and Jie Fu. 2023. Massive editing for large language models via meta learning. CoRR, abs/2311.04661. · arXiv
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aurélien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. CoRR, abs/2302.13971. · arXiv
- Aäron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. CoRR, abs/1807.03748. · arXiv
- Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11).
- Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Xin Xie, Yunzhi Yao, Bozhong Tian, Mengru Wang, Zekun Xi, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Guozhou Zheng, and Huajun Chen. 2023a. Easyedit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for large language models. CoRR, abs/2308.07269. · arXiv
- Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023b. Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. In ACL, pages 13484-13508. · DOI · Paper page
- Ziyun Xu, Chengyu Wang, Minghui Qiu, Fuli Luo, Runxin Xu, Songfang Huang, and Jun Huang. 2023. Making pre-trained language models end-to-end few- shot learners with contrastive prompt tuning. In WSDM, pages 438-446. · DOI
- Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2023. Editing large language mod- els: Problems, methods, and opportunities. CoRR, abs/2305.13172. · arXiv
- Lang Yu, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, and Liang He. 2024. MELO: enhancing model editing with neuron- indexed dynamic lora. In AAAI, pages 19449-19457. · DOI
- Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, Weng Lam Tam, Zixuan Ma, Yufei Xue, Jidong Zhai, Wenguang Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2023. GLM-130B: an open bilingual pre-trained model. In ICLR.
- Taolin Zhang, Qizhou Chen, Dongyang Li, Chengyu Wang, Xiaofeng He, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue', and Jun Huang. 2024. DAFNet: Dynamic auxiliary fu- sion for sequential model editing in large language models. In ACL, pages 1588-1602.
- Zhenru Zhang, Chuanqi Tan, Haiyang Xu, Chengyu Wang, Jun Huang, and Songfang Huang. 2023. To- wards adaptive prefix tuning for parameter-efficient language model fine-tuning. In ACL, pages 1239- 1248. · DOI
- Ce Zheng, Lei Li, Qingxiu Dong, Yuxuan Fan, Zhiyong Wu, Jingjing Xu, and Baobao Chang. 2023. Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning? CoRR, abs/2305.12740. · arXiv
- Kaijie Zhu, Qinlin Zhao, Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, and Xing Xie. 2023. Promptbench: A unified li- brary for evaluation of large language models. CoRR, abs/2312.07910. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models
Wang, P., Li, Z., Zhang, N., Xu, Z., Yao, Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, P., Huang, F., & Chen, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14768 · Cited by 19
Lifelong Knowledge Editing for Vision Language Models with Low-Rank Mixture-of-Experts
Chen, Q., Wang, C., Wang, D., Zhang, T., Li, W., & He, X. (2025) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00883 · Cited by 4
Self-citationSciReplicate-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent-driven Algorithmic Reproduction from Research Papers
Xiang, Y., Yan, H., Ouyang, S., Gui, L., & He, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.00255 · Cited by 1
Activation Trained Layer Based Controls Continual Knowledge Editing Approach
Huang, Y., Wen, Y., Zeng, J., Jia, X., & Chen, T. (2026) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-026-07100-3
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Q., Zhang, T., He, X., Li, D., Wang, C., Huang, L., & Xue’, H.
- Affiliations
- Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 13565-13580
- OpenAlex
- W4404783364
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- knowledge editing, catastrophic forgetting, knowledge retrieval, knowledge grounding, inference efficiency, recipes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.751
- The paper
- Chen, Q., Zhang, T., He, X., Li, D., Wang, C., Huang, L., & Xue’, H. (2024). Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.751