Cited by 4Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning

Open access
Chen, Qizhou, Zhang, Taolin, He, Xiaofeng, Li, Dongyang, Wang, Chengyu, Huang, Longtao, Xue’, Hui·2024·Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Model editing aims to correct outdated or erroneous knowledge in large language models (LLMs) without the need for costly retraining.Lifelong model editing is the most challenging task that caters to the continuous editing requirements of LLMs.Prior works primarily focus on single or batch editing; nevertheless, these methods fall short in lifelong editing scenarios due to catastrophic knowledge forgetting and the degradation of model performance.Although retrieval-based methods alleviate these issues, they are impeded by slow and cumbersome processes of integrating the retrieved knowledge into the model.In this work, we introduce RECIPE, a RetriEval-augmented ContInuous Prompt lEarning method, to boost editing efficacy and inference efficiency in lifelong learning.RECIPE first converts knowledge statements into short and informative continuous prompts, prefixed to the LLM's input query embedding, to efficiently refine the response grounded on the knowledge.It further integrates the Knowledge Sentinel (KS) that acts as an intermediary to calculate a dynamic threshold, determining whether the retrieval repository contains relevant knowledge.Our retriever and prompt encoder are jointly trained to achieve editing properties, i.e., reliability, generality, and locality.In our experiments, RECIPE is assessed extensively across multiple LLMs and editing datasets, where it achieves superior editing performance.RECIPE also demonstrates its capability to maintain the overall performance of LLMs alongside showcasing fast editing and inference speed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.751

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Nicola De Cao, Wilker Aziz, and Ivan Titov. 2021. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In EMNLP, pages 6491-6506. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Qi Chen, Bing Zhao, Haidong Wang, Mingqin Li, Chuanjie Liu, Zengzhong Li, Mao Yang, and Jing- dong Wang. 2021. SPANN: highly-efficient billion- scale approximate nearest neighborhood search. In NeurIPS, pages 5199-5212.
  3. Roi Cohen, Eden Biran, Ori Yoran, Amir Globerson, and Mor Geva. 2023. Evaluating the ripple effects of knowledge editing in language models. CoRR, abs/2307.12976. · arXiv
  4. Qingxiu Dong, Damai Dai, Yifan Song, Jingjing Xu, Zhifang Sui, and Lei Li. 2022. Calibrating fac- tual knowledge in pretrained language models. In EMNLP, pages 5937-5947. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Haonan Duan, Adam Dziedzic, Nicolas Papernot, and Franziska Boenisch. 2023. Flocks of stochastic par- rots: Differentially private prompt learning for large language models. In NeurIPS.
  6. Tianyu Gao, Adam Fisch, and Danqi Chen. 2021. Making pre-trained language models better few-shot learners. In ACL, pages 3816-3830. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Xiaoqi Han, Ru Li, Hongye Tan, Yuanlong Wang, Qinghua Chai, and Jeff Z. Pan. 2023. Improving se- quential model editing with fact retrieval. In EMNLP, pages 11209-11224.
  8. Thomas Hartvigsen, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Hamid Palangi, Yoon Kim, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2022. Aging with GRACE: lifelong model editing with dis- crete key-value adaptors. CoRR, abs/2211.11031. · arXiv
  9. Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross B. Girshick. 2020. Momentum contrast for un- supervised visual representation learning. In CVPR, pages 9726-9735. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recogni- tion. In CVPR, pages 770-778. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring massive multitask language under- standing. In ICLR.
  12. Chenhui Hu, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2024. Wilke: Wise-layer knowl- edge editor for lifelong knowledge editing. CoRR, abs/2402.10987. · arXiv
  13. Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR.
  14. Zeyu Huang, Yikang Shen, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jie Zhou, Wenge Rong, and Zhang Xiong. 2023. Transformer- patcher: One mistake worth one neuron. In ICLR.
  15. Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, and Wei Wang. 2024. Learning to edit: Aligning llms with knowledge editing. CoRR, abs/2402.11905. · arXiv
  16. Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Scaling laws for neural language models. CoRR, abs/2001.08361. · arXiv
  17. Itay Levy, Ben Bogin, and Jonathan Berant. 2023. Di- verse demonstrations improve in-context composi- tional generalization. In ACL, pages 1401-1422. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Omer Levy, Minjoon Seo, Eunsol Choi, and Luke Zettle- moyer. 2017. Zero-shot relation extraction via read- ing comprehension. In CoNLL, pages 333-342. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. BART: denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and com- prehension. In ACL, pages 7871-7880. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Xiang Lisa Li and Percy Liang. 2021. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. In ACL, pages 4582-4597. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Zhengxiao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2021a. P-tuning v2: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning universally across scales and tasks. CoRR, abs/2110.07602. · arXiv
  22. Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Weng Tam, Zhengx- iao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2022. P-tuning: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks. In ACL, pages 61-68. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Xiao Liu, Yanan Zheng, Zhengxiao Du, Ming Ding, Yujie Qian, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. 2021b. GPT understands, too. CoRR, abs/2103.10385. · arXiv
  24. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Man- dar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. CoRR, abs/1907.11692. · arXiv
  25. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. Locating and editing factual associa- tions in GPT. In NeurIPS.
  26. Kevin Meng, Arnab Sen Sharma, Alex J. Andonian, Yonatan Belinkov, and David Bau. 2023. Mass- editing memory in a transformer. In ICLR.
  27. Abhika Mishra, Akari Asai, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yizhong Wang, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Fine-grained halluci- nation detection and editing for language models. CoRR, abs/2401.06855. · arXiv
  28. Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D. Manning. 2022. Fast model editing at scale. In ICLR.
  29. Jesse Mu, Xiang Li, and Noah D. Goodman. 2023. Learning to compress prompts with gist tokens. In NeurIPS.
  30. Yixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal, Jason Weston, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Adversarial NLI: A new benchmark for natural language under- standing. In ACL, pages 4885-4901. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexander H. Miller. 2019. Language models as knowledge bases? In EMNLP, pages 2463-2473. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. 2018. Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for squad. In ACL, pages 784-789.
  33. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100, 000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In EMNLP, pages 2383-2392. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In EMNLP, pages 3980-3990. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis and Nikolaos D. Tselikas. 2023. Chatgpt and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6):192. · DOI
  36. Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019. Commonsenseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowl- edge. In NAACL, pages 4149-4158. · DOI
  37. Chenmien Tan, Ge Zhang, and Jie Fu. 2023. Massive editing for large language models via meta learning. CoRR, abs/2311.04661. · arXiv
  38. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aurélien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. CoRR, abs/2302.13971. · arXiv
  39. Aäron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. CoRR, abs/1807.03748. · arXiv
  40. Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11).
  41. Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Xin Xie, Yunzhi Yao, Bozhong Tian, Mengru Wang, Zekun Xi, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Guozhou Zheng, and Huajun Chen. 2023a. Easyedit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for large language models. CoRR, abs/2308.07269. · arXiv
  42. Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023b. Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. In ACL, pages 13484-13508. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ziyun Xu, Chengyu Wang, Minghui Qiu, Fuli Luo, Runxin Xu, Songfang Huang, and Jun Huang. 2023. Making pre-trained language models end-to-end few- shot learners with contrastive prompt tuning. In WSDM, pages 438-446. · DOI
  44. Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2023. Editing large language mod- els: Problems, methods, and opportunities. CoRR, abs/2305.13172. · arXiv
  45. Lang Yu, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, and Liang He. 2024. MELO: enhancing model editing with neuron- indexed dynamic lora. In AAAI, pages 19449-19457. · DOI
  46. Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, Weng Lam Tam, Zixuan Ma, Yufei Xue, Jidong Zhai, Wenguang Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2023. GLM-130B: an open bilingual pre-trained model. In ICLR.
  47. Taolin Zhang, Qizhou Chen, Dongyang Li, Chengyu Wang, Xiaofeng He, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue', and Jun Huang. 2024. DAFNet: Dynamic auxiliary fu- sion for sequential model editing in large language models. In ACL, pages 1588-1602.
  48. Zhenru Zhang, Chuanqi Tan, Haiyang Xu, Chengyu Wang, Jun Huang, and Songfang Huang. 2023. To- wards adaptive prefix tuning for parameter-efficient language model fine-tuning. In ACL, pages 1239- 1248. · DOI
  49. Ce Zheng, Lei Li, Qingxiu Dong, Yuxuan Fan, Zhiyong Wu, Jingjing Xu, and Baobao Chang. 2023. Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning? CoRR, abs/2305.12740. · arXiv
  50. Kaijie Zhu, Qinlin Zhao, Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, and Xing Xie. 2023. Promptbench: A unified li- brary for evaluation of large language models. CoRR, abs/2312.07910. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., Zhang, T., He, X., Li, D., Wang, C., Huang, L., & Xue’, H.
Affiliations
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
  • East China Normal University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2024
Pages
13565-13580
OpenAlex
W4404783364
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
knowledge editing, catastrophic forgetting, knowledge retrieval, knowledge grounding, inference efficiency, recipes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.751
The paper
Chen, Q., Zhang, T., He, X., Li, D., Wang, C., Huang, L., & Xue’, H. (2024). Lifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.751