Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot.This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relationextraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples.Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ZsRE is a context-free question-answering dataset generated by BART with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a context-free question-answering (QA) dataset generated by BART (Lewis et al., 2020) with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.”
From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
The Dataset section describes a QA dataset with human verification of question templates, supporting the dataset identification and quality-control parts. It says each example includes a sentence from which the answer is drawn, so it does not support calling the dataset context-free; it also does not address use in knowledge editing. The sentence cites Lewis et al. separately for BART, so that part is not assessed against Levy et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredZsRE is augmented with paraphrased variants of the original question and unrelated but structurally similar questions to test generalization and specificity.
“To facilitate comprehensive assessment of model editing capabilities, the dataset is augmented with two types of auxiliary samples: (1) paraphrased variants of the original question, which test the model's ability to generalize the update, and (2) unrelated but structurally similar questions, which assess the specificity of the edit by ensuring unrelated knowledge remains unaffected.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Section 6.2 (page unavailable) describes alternative question templates for the same relation and tests generalization to unseen phrasings. The paper does not describe augmenting ZsRE with unrelated, structurally similar questions to assess whether a model edit leaves unrelated knowledge unaffected; its experiments concern relation extraction, not model editing. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredZsRE is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.
“ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
The Dataset section says the authors generated a large question-answering dataset, and the Setup and Experiments sections show its use to evaluate zero-shot relation extraction. These passages support identifying the dataset with Levy et al. (2017), but do not establish that it is widely adopted or used to evaluate factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe ZsRE question-answering task is extensively studied within the model editing literature.
“The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Each ZsRE record contains an editing statement x_e, a paraphrase prompt x'_e, and a locality prompt x_loc.
“where each record contains an editing statement x e , a paraphrase prompt x ′ e , and a locality prompt x loc .”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Hyperparameters In our experiments, we initialized word embeddings with GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014), and did not fine-tune them.”
MethodSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeaching Machines to Read and ComprehendPreprint
Hermann, K. M., Kočiský, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., & Blunsom, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03340 · Cited by 2,779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To support relation extraction, our dataset deviates from recent reading comprehension formulations (Hermann et al., 2015; Rajpurkar et al., 2016), and introduces negative examples – question-sentence pairs that have no answers ( A = ∅ ).”
MethodOpen Information Extraction from the Web
Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Cafarella, M. J., Soderland, S., & Weld, D. S. (2007) · CACM · doi:10.1145/1409360.1409378 · Cited by 2,620 · see citing works
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 2,322 · cited 5× · see citing works
“We start from the BiDAF model (Seo et al., 2016), whose input is two sequences of words: a sentence s and a question q.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEnd-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures
Miwa, M., & Bansal, M. (2016) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1105 · Cited by 1,284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lastly, we retrain an off-the-shelf relation extraction system (Miwa and Bansal, 2016), which has shown promising results on a number of benchmarks.”
MethodRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 846 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Toutanova et al. (2015) proposed a similar approach that decomposes natural-language relations and computes their similarity in a universal schema setting; however, they did not extend their method to knowledge-base relations, nor did they attempt to recover out-of-schema relations as we do.”
BackgroundDynamic Coattention Networks For Question AnsweringPreprint
Xiong, C., Zhong, V., & Socher, R. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01604 · Cited by 827 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLarge-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The Simple QA dataset (Bordes et al., 2015) was created by annotating questions about individual Freebase facts (e.”
MethodWikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528 · cited 3× · see citing works
“WikiReading was collected by aligning each Wikidata (Vrandeˇci´c, 2012) relation R ( e, a ) with the corresponding Wikipedia article D for the entity e , under the reasonable assumption that the relation can be derived from the article’s text.”
MethodInjecting Logical Background Knowledge into Embeddings for Relation Extraction
Rocktäschel, T., Singh, S., & Riedel, S. (2015) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1118 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Question-Answer Driven Semantic Role Labeling: Using Natural Language to Annotate Natural Language
He, L.-H., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1076 · Cited by 241 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For the task of identifying predicate-argument structures, QA-SRL (He et al., 2015) was proposed as an open schema for semantic roles, in which the relation between an argument and a predicate is expressed as a natural-language question containing the predicate (“Where was someone educated?”) whose…”
BackgroundSelf-citationMulti-Perspective Context Matching for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Wang, Z., Mi, H.-T., Hamza, W., & Florian, R. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.04211 · Cited by 160 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLifted Rule Injection for Relation Embeddings
Demeester, T., Rocktäschel, T., & Riedel, S. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1146 · Cited by 142 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rockt¨aschel et al. (2015) and Demeester et al. (2016) use inference rules to predict hidden knowledge-base relations from observed natural-language relations.”
BackgroundWikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over Wikipedia
Hewlett, D., Lacoste, A., Jones, L., Polosukhin, I., Fandrianto, A., Han, J. J., Kelcey, M., & Berthelot, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1145 · Cited by 125 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Slot-Filling Data We use the WikiReading dataset (Hewlett et al., 2016) to collect labeled”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning Recurrent Span Representations for Extractive Question AnsweringPreprint
Lee, K., Salant, S., Kwiatkowski, T., Parikh, A. P., Das, D., & Berant, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01436 · Cited by 118 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundEffective Crowd Annotation for Relation Extraction
Liu, A., Soderland, S., Bragg, J., Lin, C. H., Ling, X., & Weld, D. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1104 · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When the type of facts (relations) are predefined, one can use crowdsourcing (Liu et al., 2016) or distant supervision (Hoffmann et al., 2011) to collect examples and train an extraction model for each relation type.”
MethodGeneralizing to Unseen Entities and Entity Pairs with Row-less Universal Schema
Verga, P., Neelakantan, A., & Mccallum, A. (2016) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1058 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Verga et al. (2017) predict facts for entity pairs that were not observed in the original matrix; this is equivalent to extracting seen relation types with unseen entities (see Section 6.1).”
BackgroundInfluentialSeed-Based Event Trigger Labeling: How far can event descriptions get us?
Bronstein, O., Dagan, I., Li, Q., Ji, H., & Frank, A. (2015) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-2061 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bronstein et al. (2015) explore a similar zero-shot setting for event-trigger identification, in which R N +1 is specified by a set of trigger words at test time.”
BackgroundLearning to Answer Questions from Wikipedia Infoboxes
Morales, A., Premtoon, V., Avery, C., Felshin, S., & Katz, B. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1199 · Cited by 16 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Following the methodology of InfoboxQA (Morales et al., 2016), we generate negative examples by matching (for the same entity e ) a question q that pertains to one relation with a sentence s that expresses another relation.”
MethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Raphael Hoffmann, Congle Zhang, Xiao Ling, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Daniel S Weld. 2011. Knowledge- based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies- Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 541-550.
- Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, and Benjamin M. Marlin. 2013. Relation ex- traction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Proceedings of the 2013 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pages 74-84. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1008.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08691 · Cited by 3,092
“For this task, several different question answering datasets (Dua et al., 2019; Saha et al., 2018; Lai et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017; Kembhavi et al., 2017; Rajpurkar et al., 2016) are converted into a singular, extractive format.”
BackgroundThe Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096 · see citing works
“For this task, several different question answering datasets (Dua et al., 2019; Saha et al., 2018; Lai et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017; Kembhavi et al., 2017; Rajpurkar et al., 2016) are converted into a singular, extractive format.”
BackgroundKnow What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240 · see citing works
“The Zero-shot Relation Extraction dataset (Levy et al., 2017) contains negative examples generated with distant supervision.”
BackgroundMethodcode2vec: learning distributed representations of code
Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., & Yahav, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3290353 · Cited by 1,235 · see citing works
“…recently, mainly for neural machine translation (NMT) [Bahdanau et al. 2014; Luong et al. 2015; Vaswani et al. 2017], reading comprehension [Levy et al. 2017; Seo et al. 2016], image captioning [Xu et al. 2015], and more [Ba et al. 2014; Bahdanau et al. 2016; Chorowski et al. 2015; Mnih et…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRecent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387 · see citing works
“[95] irst formulated relation extraction as a QA task.”
MethodFinetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners
Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., Du, N., Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01652 · Cited by 1,101 · see citing works
“, 2015), relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017), coreference resolution (Wu et al.”
BackgroundMethodCOMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction
Bosselut, A., Rashkin, H., Sap, M., Malaviya, C., Celikyilmaz, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1470 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
“Second, in our main model, we map relation names to natural language (e.g., IsA → “is a”; HasSubevent→ “has subevent”) so the model can learn to represent these concepts with language, as opposed to learning a special embedding from scratch for each relation (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundRetrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
QuAC: Question Answering in Context
Choi, E., He, H., Iyyer, M., Yatskar, M., Yih, W.-T., Choi, Y., Liang, P., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1241 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Self-citationUnified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extraction
Lu, Y., Liu, Q., Dai, D., Xiao, X.-Y., Lin, H.-Y., Han, X.-P., Sun, L., & Wu, H. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.12277 · Cited by 692
“…and many classical neural architectures have been proposed, such as sequence tagging (Lample et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2019), span classification (Sohrab and Miwa, 2018; Lin et al., 2018; Wad-den et al., 2019), and MRC (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020; Du and Cardie, 2020).”
Autoregressive Entity RetrievalPreprint
Cao, N. D., Izacard, G., Riedel, S., & Petroni, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.00904 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
“…2019), HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018c), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), ELI5 (Fan et al., 2019); slot filling with T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017); entity disambiguation on AIDA CoNLL-YAGO, WNED-WIKI and WNED-CWEB; dialogue with Wizard of Wikipedia (Dinan et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognition
Li, X., Feng, J., Meng, Y., Han, Q., Wu, F., & Li, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.519 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
“For example, Levy et al. (2017) transformed the task of relation extraction to a QA task: each relation type R(x, y) can be parameterized as a question q(x) whose answer is y. For example, the relation EDUCATED-AT can be mapped to “Where did x study?”. Given a question q(x), if a non-null answer y can be extracted fro…”
InfluentialWelbl, J., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00021 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
“same property as in q and keeping their answer expressions. As an example, for the WIKI6 We use the WIKIDATA triples present in WIKIREADING. 7 We thus use a disjoint subset of WIKIREADING compared to Levy et al. (2017) to construct WIKIHOP. DATA property country, this would be the set fFrance;Russia;:::g. Graph traver…”
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Self-citationDocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset
Yao, Y., Ye, D., Li, P., Han, X., Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Huang, L., Zhou, J., & Sun, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1074 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) extract relational facts from documents by answering questions using reading comprehension methods, where the questions are converted from entity-relation pairs.”
BackgroundOne Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text EmbeddingsPreprint
Su, H., Shi, W., Kasai, J., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Ostendorf, M., Yih, W.-T., Smith, N. A., Zettlemoyer, L., & Yu, T. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09741 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
“…al., 2020) Symmetric 50,000 ccnews_title_text (Hamborg et al., 2017) Asymmetric 25,000 triviaqa (Joshi et al., 2017) Asymmetric 50,000 zero_shot_re (Levy et al., 2017) Asymmetric 15,000 flickr30k_captions (Young et al., 2014) Symmetric 25,000 xsum (Narayan et al., 2018) Asymmetric 10,000…”
Self-citationBenchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approach
Yin, W., Hay, J., & Roth, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1404 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) and Obamuyide and Vlachos (2018) study zero-shot relation extraction by converting it into a machine comprehension and textual entailment problem respectively.”
BackgroundA Survey of Zero-Shot Learning: Settings, Methods, and Applications
Wang, W., Zheng, V. W., Yu, H., & Miao, C. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3293318 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
“Finally, it has been used in other problems related to NLP, such as entity extraction from web pages [117], fine-grained named entity typing [99], cross-lingual document retrieval [47], and relation extraction [85].”
MethodEvent Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions
Du, X., & Cardie, C. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.49 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
“In the information extraction literature, Levy et al. (2017) propose the zero-shot relation extraction task and reduce the task to answering crowd-sourced reading comprehension questions.”
BackgroundThe Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering
McCann, B., Keskar, N. S., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08730 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
“As with SRL, we use a dataset that maps relations to a set of questions so that relation extraction can be treated as question answering: QA-ZRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodInfluentialA Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction
Zhong, L., Wu, J. X., Li, Q., Peng, H., & Wu, X. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3618295 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
“[211] turn zero-shot RC into a reading comprehension problem to comprehend unseen labels by a template converter.”
BackgroundHybrid Attention-Based Prototypical Networks for Noisy Few-Shot Relation Classification
Gao, T., Han, X., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016407 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
“Note that there are also some works attempting to handle RC in a zero-shot scenario (Levy et al. 2017), incorporating extra information to classify relations never appearing in training sets.”
BackgroundEntity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering
Li, X., Yin, F., Sun, Z., Li, X., Yuan, A., Chai, D., Zhou, M., & Li, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1129 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
“Our work is highly inspired by Levy et al. (2017).”
BackgroundPrompting GPT-3 To Be ReliablePreprint
Si, C., Gan, Z., Yang, Z.-Y., Wang, S.-H., Wang, J., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Wang, L.-J. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.09150 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“2) We also use the zsRE question-answering dataset (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodContinual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Shi, H., Xu, Z., Wang, H., Qin, W., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Ebrahimi, S., & Wang, H. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3735633 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks
Petroni, F., Piktus, A., Fan, A., Lewis, P., Yazdani, M., De Cao, N., Thorne, J., Jernite, Y., Karpukhin, V., Maillard, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.200 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
“Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017) is a dataset designed to translate relation extraction into a reading comprehension problem.”
BackgroundEvaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Models
Cohen, R., Biran, E., Yoran, O., Globerson, A., & Geva, M. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00644 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“The prominent benchmarks for evaluating factual KE are the Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017; De Cao et al., 2021) and CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022). zsRE is a question-answering dataset for relation-specific queries, which includes human generated paraphrases that are used…”
BackgroundMRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehension
Fisch, A., Talmor, A., Jia, R., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Chen, D. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5801 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017) Given a slot-filling dataset, 5 relations among entities are systematically transformed into question-answer pairs using templates.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEvent Extraction as Machine Reading Comprehension
Liu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Bi, W., & Liu, X. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.128 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“But different from our work, most of the above methods (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019b; FitzGerald et al., 2018; Du and Cardie, 2020) adopt human-designed, context-independent questions, which may not provide enough contextual evidence for question-answering.”
Background♫ MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition
Trivedi, H., Balasubramanian, N., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00475 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“, 2018), Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017)) and filter it down to 760K good single-hop questions using this pipeline.”
BackgroundA Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story Generation
Guan, J., Huang, F., Zhao, Z., Zhu, X., & Huang, M. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00302 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Research
Jin, J., Zhu, Y., Dou, Z.-C., Dong, G.-T., Yang, X.-Y., Zhang, C.-H., Zhao, T., Yang, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3701716.3715313 · Cited by 262
PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformer
Li, X., Li, S.-S., Song, S.-Z., Yang, J., Ma, J., & Yu, J. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08742 · Cited by 258
“For the datasets, we performed counterfactual update experiments on two datasets: Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) (Levy et al. 2017) and C OUNTER F ACT (Meng et al. 2022a).”
MethodGoLLIE: Annotation Guidelines improve Zero-Shot Information-ExtractionPreprint
Sainz, O., García-Ferrero, I., Agerri, R., de Lacalle, O. L., Rigau, G., & Agirre, E. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03668 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“Lu et al. (2022a) introduced a unified text-to-structure generation that can model different IE tasks universally.”
BackgroundFrom Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“Generative recommendation systems do not require the computation of ranking scores for each item followed by database indexing, but instead accomplish item recommendations through the direct generation of IDs.”
Bidirectional Machine Reading Comprehension for Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction
Chen, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17500 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
“…is a tendency to apply MRC on many NLP tasks, including named entity recognition (Li et al. 2020), entity relation extraction (Li et al. 2019b; Levy et al. 2017), and summarization (McCann et al. 2018), etc. Due to the advantages of MRC framework, we naturally transform ASTE into a multi-turn…”
BackgroundLocating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT
Meng, K., Bau, D., Andonian, A., & Belinkov, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.05262 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
“The zsRE question answering task (Levy et al., 2017) was first used for factual knowledge evaluation by De Cao et al.”
MethodLearning and Evaluating General Linguistic IntelligencePreprint
Yogatama, D., d’Autume, C. D. M., Connor, J. T., Kočiský, T., Chrzanowski, M., Kong, L., Lazaridou, A., Wang, L., Yu, L., Dyer, C., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11373 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Zero-Shot Transfer Learning for Event Extraction
Huang, L., Ji, H., Cho, K., Dagan, I., Riedel, S., & Voss, C. R. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1201 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“, 2016), relation extraction (Verga et al., 2016; Levy et al., 2017), semantic parsing (Bapna et al.”
BackgroundLLMs4OL: Large Language Models for Ontology Learning
Giglou, H. B., D'Souza, J., & Auer, S. (2023) · International Workshop on the Semantic Web · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.16648 · Cited by 216
“Further studies extended LAMA by the automated discovery of prompts [25], finetuning LLMs for better probing [3,32,68], or a purely unsupervised way of probing knowledge from LMs [50].”
BackgroundAtlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models
Izacard, G., Lewis, P., Lomeli, M., Hosseini, L., Petroni, F., Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Joulin, A., Riedel, S., & Grave, E. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.03299 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
“…answering: NaturalQuestions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017) and HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018); slot filling: Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017) and T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018); entity linking: AIDA CoNLL-YAGO (Hoffart et al., 2011); dialogue: Wizard of Wikipedia (Dinan et…”
MethodEvent Extraction as Multi-turn Question Answering
Li, F., Peng, W., Chen, Y., Wang, Q., Pan, L., Lyu, Y., & Zhu, Y. T. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.73 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) and McCann et al. (2018) tried to formulate relation extraction as single-turn QA tasks.”
BackgroundMulti-style Generative Reading Comprehension
Nishida, K., Saito, I., Nishida, K., Shinoda, K., Otsuka, A., Asano, H., & Tomita, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1220 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“The previous work of (Levy et al., 2017; Clark and Gardner, 2018) outputted a no-answer score depending on the probability of all answer spans.”
BackgroundQA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension
Rogers, A., Gardner, M., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560260 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“18QA models are even used directly for relation extraction [1, 161, 168].”
MethodCan Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction AttacksPreprint
Patil, V., Hase, P., & Bansal, M. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17410 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
“We use two datasets for evaluation, CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022) and zsRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodCrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLP
Ye, Q., Lin, B. Y., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.572 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“…qa Kwiatkowski et al. 2019 kilt_trex qa/closed-book qa Elsahar et al. 2018 kilt_wow cg/dialogue Dinan et al. 2019 kilt_zsre qa/closed-book qa Levy et al. 2017 lama-conceptnet qa/closed-book qa Petroni et al. 2019, 2020 lama-google_re qa/closed-book qa Petroni et al. 2019, 2020 lama-squad…”
A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zhang, N., Yao, Y., Tian, B., Wang, P., Deng, S.-M., Wang, M.-R., Xi, Z.-K., Mao, S., Zhang, J., Ni, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.01286 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
“For knowledge modification, we have selected the following four datasets: ZsRE [173], Wik-iBio [155], Wikidata recent [149], and Convsent [145].”
MethodRe2G: Retrieve, Rerank, GeneratePreprint
Glass, M. R., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M. F. M., Naik, A. R., Cai, P., & Gliozzo, A. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.06300 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Models
De Cao, N., Aziz, W., & Titov, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.522 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“For that we fine-tune a BART base model (Lewis et al., 2020) with a standard seq2seq objective on the Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) dataset by Levy et al. (2017).”
MethodPromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Prompts
Bach, S., Sanh, V., Yong, Z. X., Webson, A., Raffel, C., Nayak, N. V., Sharma, A., Kim, T., Bari, M. S., Fevry, T., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-demo.9 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
“This prompt for QA-ZRE (Levy et al., 2017), a dataset for zero-shot relation extraction, shows how to manipulate strings and do conditional statements with Jinja.”
MethodNeural Machine Reading Comprehension: Methods and Trends
Liu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Wang, H., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183698 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“[87] add an extra trainable bias to the confidence score of start and end position and apply SoftMax to the new score to obtain the probability distributions of no answer.”
MethodRecognizing Emotion Cause in Conversations
Poria, S., Majumder, N., Hazarika, D., Ghosal, D., Bhardwaj, R., Yu, S., Hong, P., Ghosh, R., Roy, A., Chhaya, N., et al. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09925-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Context
Min, S., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.201 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationA comprehensive survey on relation extraction: recent advances and new frontiers
Zhao, X., Deng, Y., Yang, M., Wang, L., Zhang, R., Cheng, H., Lam, W., Shen, Y., & Xu, R. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3674501 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“For example, Levy et al. [86] first formulated the RE task as a question answering (QA) task, where the relations are defined by natural-language question templates.”
Real-Time Open-Domain Question Answering with Dense-Sparse Phrase Index
Seo, M., Lee, J., Kwiatkowski, T., Parikh, A. P., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1436 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Following Levy et al. (2017), we introduce a trainable no-answer bias when computing softmax.”
MethodSelf-citationRead + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questions
Hu, M., Wei, F., Peng, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, N., & Zhou, M. (2018) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016529 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“To address this problem, previous works (Levy et al., 2017; Clark and Gardner, 2018) predict a no-answer probability in addition to the distribution over answer spans, so as to jointly learn no-answer detection as well as answer extraction.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA taxonomy and review of generalization research in NLP
Hupkes, D., Giulianelli, M., Dankers, V., Artetxe, M., Elazar, Y., Pimentel, T., Christodoulopoulos, C., Lasri, K., Saphra, N., Sinclair, A. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00729-y · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Machine Knowledge: Creation and Curation of Comprehensive Knowledge Bases
Weikum, G., Dong, X. L., Razniewski, S., & Suchanek, F. M. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000064 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“, [351, 361, 119]).”
Chia, Y. K., Bing, L., Poria, S., & Si, L. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09101 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“Zero-Shot Relation Slot-Filling (Levy et al., 2017) aims to predict the tail entity based on the provided head entity and relation, but also relies on other methods for entity d t ction.”
MethodInfluentialLabel Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero and Few-Shot Relation Extraction
Sainz, O., de Lacalle, O. L., Labaka, G., Barrena, A., & Agirre, E. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.92 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“ment), which allows the use of readily available question answering (or entailment) training data (Yin et al., 2019; Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialCorefQA: Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span Prediction
Wu, W., Wang, F., Yuan, A., Wu, F., & Li, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.622 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) reduced relation extraction to answering simple reading comprehension questions, yielding models that generalize better in the zero-shot setting.”
BackgroundGlobal-to-Local Neural Networks for Document-Level Relation Extraction
Wang, D., Hu, W. P., Cao, E., & Sun, W. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.303 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Furthermore, to cope with the wrong labeling problem caused by distant supervision, Besides, a few models (Levy et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2018) borrowed the reading comprehension techniques to document-level RE.”
MethodLocating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT
Meng, K., Bau, D., Andonian, A., & Belinkov, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1262 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“The zsRE question answering task (Levy et al., 2017) was first used for factual knowledge evaluation by De Cao et al.”
MethodGetting Closer to AI Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Real Tasks
Rogers, A., Kovaleva, O., Downey, M., & Rumshisky, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6398 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“For the unanswerable questions, the form emphasized that they all needed to be incorrect but plausible (Levy et al. 2017).”
BackgroundDialogue-Based Relation Extraction
Yu, D., Sun, K., Cardie, C., & Yu, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.444 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“…Over the past few years, neural models have achieved remarkable success in RE (Nguyen and Grishman, 2015b,a; Adel et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017; Su et al., 2018; Song et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2019), in which the input representation usually comes from shallow neural…”
BackgroundModel Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescue
Gu, J.-C., Xu, H.-Y., Ma, J.-J., Lu, P., Ling, Z.-H., Chang, K.-W., & Peng, N.-Y. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.934 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“The popular model editing dataset Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (Z S RE) (Levy et al., 2017) used in previous work (Cao et al., 2021; Meng et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2023) was adopted in our experiments.”
MethodInterpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine Reading
Saeidi, M., Bartolo, M., Lewis, P., Singh, S., Rocktäschel, T., Sheldon, M., Bouchard, G., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1233 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“For a given rule text and question pair, a negative example is generated by sampling a random question from the set of all possible questions, excluding the question itself and questions sourced from the same document using a methodology similar to the work of Levy et al. (2017).”
MethodInvestigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension
Sun, K., Yu, D., Yu, D., & Cardie, C. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00305 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“from other resources may be necessary to solve a significant percentage of questions. Besides these standard tasks, we are aware that there is a trend of formalizing tasks such as relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017), word prediction (Chu et al., 2017), and judgment prediction (Long et al., 2018) as extractive or no…”
BackgroundThe Art of Saying No: Contextual Noncompliance in Language Models
Brahman, F., Kumar, S., Balachandran, V., Dasigi, P., Pyatkin, V., Ravichander, A., Wiegreffe, S., Dziri, N., Chandu, K., Hessel, J., et al. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.12043 · Cited by 137
“These categories in our taxonomy are inspired from early reading comprehension datasets which introduced notions of unanswerable queries that models should identify [60, 42, 20, 80].”
BackgroundZS-BERT: Towards Zero-Shot Relation Extraction with Attribute Representation Learning
Chen, C.-Y., & Li, C. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.272 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“First, while the typical study (Levy et al., 2017) cannot perform zero-shot relation classification without putting more human effort on it, as they solve this problem via pre-defining question templates.”
SPARTQA: A Textual Question Answering Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning
Mirzaee, R., Faghihi, H. R., Qiang, N., & Kordjamshidi, P. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.364 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“…capability of reading comprehension (Gardner et al., 2019) and many recent works have been implementing this strategy to test machines’ understanding of linguistic formalisms: He et al. (2015); Michael et al. (2018); Levy et al. (2017); Jia et al. (2018); Ning et al. (2020); Du and Cardie (2020).”
BackgroundLearning Dense Representations of Phrases at Scale
Lee, J., Sung, M., Kang, J., & Chen, D. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.518 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“We focus on using two slot filling datasets from the KILT benchmark (Petroni et al., 2021): T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018) and zero-shot relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodBiomedical named entity recognition using BERT in the machine reading comprehension framework
Sun, C., Yang, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., & Wang, J. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103799 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“Inspired by the current trend of formalizing NLP tasks into machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks [19]–[23], we use BioBERT in the MRC framework to perform BioNER (referred to BioBERT-MRC).”
MethodMELO: Enhancing Model Editing with Neuron-Indexed Dynamic LoRA
Yu, L., Chen, Q., Zhou, J., & He, L. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11795 · Cited by 129
“• zsRE is a question answering (QA) dataset built upon zero-shot relation extraction (Levy et al. 2017).”
BackgroundTORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions
Ning, Q., Wu, H., Han, R., Peng, N., Gardner, M., & Roth, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.88 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“In zero-shot relation extraction (RE), they reduced relation slot filling to an RC problem so as to build very large distant training data and improve zero-shot learning performance (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodModel Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgetting
Gupta, A., Rao, A., & Anumanchipalli, G. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.07453 · Cited by 126
“These experiments will be expanded to other models in future iterations of the paper.”
BackgroundMethodZero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer with Meta Learning
Nooralahzadeh, F., Bekoulis, G., Bjerva, J., & Augenstein, I. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.368 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“, relation extraction is transformed to question answering (Levy et al., 2017; Abdou et al., 2019)); or (ii) meta-learning (Andrychowicz et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEditing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities
Yao, Y., Wang, P., Tian, B., Cheng, S., Li, Z., Deng, S., Chen, H., & Zhang, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13172 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“As a result, we select some data instances from the ZsRE and the C OUNTER F ACT dataset.”
MethodInfluentialUniversal Information Extraction as Unified Semantic Matching
Lou, J., Lu, Y., Dai, D., Jia, W., Lin, H., Han, X., Sun, L., & Wu, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26563 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Specifi-cally, as shown in Figure 3, USM first verbalizes all label schemas (Levy et al. 2017; Li et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2022) and learns the schema-text joint embedding to build a shared label text semantic space.”
BackgroundInfluentialSPARTA: Efficient Open-Domain Question Answering via Sparse Transformer Matching Retrieval
Zhao, T., Lu, X., & Lee, K. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.47 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“…et al., 2015) PubMed Documents DROP (Dua et al., 2019) Wikipedia DuoRC (Saha et al., 2018) Wikipedia+IMDB RACE (Lai et al., 2017) English Exam RE (Levy et al., 2017) Wikipedia Textbook (Kembhavi et al., 2017) K12 Textbook For evaluation metrics, we use Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) as the criteria.”
BackgroundMethodLearning to Extract Attribute Value from Product via Question Answering: A Multi-task Approach
Wang, Q., Li, Y., Kanagal, B., Sanghai, S. K., Sivakumar, D., Shu, B., Yu, Z., & Elsas, J. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403047 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“However, relation extraction has traditionally focused on extracting relations from sentences relying on entity linking systems to identify the subject/object and building models to learn the predicates in a sentence [3, 22].”
BackgroundFew-Shot Question Answering by Pretraining Span Selection
Ram, O., Kirstain, Y., Berant, J., Globerson, A., & Levy, O. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.239 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“, 2020), with some extensions allowing for unanswerable questions (Levy et al., 2017; Rajpurkar et al., 2018) or multiple answer spans (Dua et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeepMet: A Reading Comprehension Paradigm for Token-level Metaphor Detection
Su, C., Fukumoto, F., Huang, X., Li, J., Wang, R., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Workshop on Figurative Language Processing (FigLang) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.figlang-1.4 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) translated the information extraction task into the reading comprehension task with good results.”
MAVE: A Product Dataset for Multi-source Attribute Value Extraction
Yang, L., Wang, Q., Yu, Z., Kulkarni, A., Sanghai, S. K., Shu, B., Elsas, J. L., & Kanagal, B. (2021) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498377 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“However, relation extraction has traditionally focused on extracting relations from sentences relying on entity linking systems to identify the subject/object and building models to learn the predicates in a sentence [5, 26].”
BackgroundFlooding spread of manipulated knowledge in LLM-based multi-agent communities
Ju, T., Wang, Y.-T., Hua, Y., Ma, X.-B., Cheng, P., Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Xie, J., Zhang, Z.-S., et al. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4663-2 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“Finally, we systematically validate the mitigation capabilities of the two proposed defense strategies against different types of manipulated knowledge spread.”
Learning from Task Descriptions
Weller, O., Lourie, N., Gardner, M., & Peters, M. E. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.105 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“2019) and have shown promising results in zero shot prediction by leveraging their language understanding capabilities (Levy et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodGeneralizing Question Answering System with Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning
Su, D., Xu, Y., Winata, G. I., Xu, P., Kim, H., Liu, Z., & Fung, P. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5827 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Except for the RelationExtraction dataset, all the out-of-domain datasets only have a strong relationship with one or two in-domain datasets but are positioned far from the others.”
BackgroundZero-Shot Learning for Requirements Classification: An Exploratory Study
Alhoshan, W., Ferrari, A., & Zhao, L. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04723 · Cited by 98
“ZSL has shown great potential in various NLP tasks, such as entity recognition [66], relation extraction [67], document classification [68], and text classification [65].”
BackgroundWebFormer: The Web-page Transformer for Structure Information Extraction
Wang, Q., Fang, Y., Ravula, A., Feng, F.-L., Quan, X., & Liu, D. (2022) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512032 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“subject/object and building models to learn the predicates in a sentence [8, 23].”
BackgroundMitchell, E., Lin, C., Bosselut, A., Finn, C., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.11309 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Specifically, for seq2seq models, we use the zsRE question-answering dataset (Levy et al., 2017) using question rephrasings generated by backtranslation as the equivalence neighborhood and train/val splits generated by De Cao et al.”
MethodDo Language Models Have Beliefs? Methods for Detecting, Updating, and Visualizing Model BeliefsPreprint
Hase, P., Diab, M., Çelikyılmaz, A., Li, X., Kozareva, Z., Stoyanov, V., Bansal, M., & Iyer, S. V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13654 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“shuffle into train/dev/test splits with 80/10/10% of the data (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundKnowledge-aware Zero-Shot Learning: Survey and Perspective
Chen, J.-Y., Geng, Y.-X., Chen, Z., Horrocks, I., Pan, J. Z., & Chen, H.-J. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/597 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
ATOM: Commit Message Generation Based on Abstract Syntax Tree and Hybrid Ranking
Liu, S., Gao, C., Chen, S., Nie, L. Y., & Liu, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3038681 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“The Bahdanau [22] or Luong [23] Attention has been widely adopted into neural machine translation [25], reading comprehension [26] and computer vision [27].”
Zero-shot Relation Classification as Textual Entailment
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2018) · FEVER@EMNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5511 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“Levy et al. (2017) showed that a related and complementary task, that of entity/attribute relation extraction, can be reduced to a question answering problem.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialParadigm Shift in Natural Language Processing
Sun, T., Liu, X.-Y., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2022) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1331-6 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“, 2015) 2016 Parsing Seq2ASeq (M)LM (Choe and Charniak, 2016) 2017 Relation Extraction Class MRC (Levy et al., 2017) 2018 Text Summarization SeqLab Seq2Seq (McCann et al.”
BackgroundFCCA: Hybrid Code Representation for Functional Clone Detection Using Attention Networks
Hua, W., Sui, Y., Wan, Y., Liu, G., & Xu, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2020.3001918 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“Beyond boosting the performance in a wide range of applications, attention mechanism is also playing a key role in improving the explainability of deep learning models, benefiting machine translation [19], machine reading comprehension [20], image captioning [21], and document classification [22].”
BackgroundDifferentiable Reasoning over a Virtual Knowledge BasePreprint
Dhingra, B., Zaheer, M., Balachandran, V., Neubig, G., Salakhutdinov, R., & Cohen, W. W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10640 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Existing slot-filling tasks (Levy et al., 2017; Surdeanu, 2013) focus on a single-hop , static corpus setting, whereas our task considers a dynamic setting which requires the system to traverse the corpus.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTrue Few-Shot Learning with Prompts—A Real-World Perspective
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00485 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“While most approaches rephrase tasks as a language modeling problem, some use prompts to reformulate them as different tasks for which large amounts of training data are available (Levy et al., 2017; McCann et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2021; Sainz et al., 2021).”
BackgroundZero-Shot Question Generation from Knowledge Graphs for Unseen Predicates and Entity Types
ElSahar, H., Gravier, C., & Laforest, F. (2018) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1020 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“We develop three setups that follow the same procedure as (Levy et al., 2017) for Zero-Shot relation extraction to evaluate how our model generalizes to: 1) unseen predicates, 2) unseen sub-types and 3) unseen obj-types.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRevisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors
Li, G., Wang, P., & Ke, W. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05028 · Cited by 87
“tracting relations that were not specified in advance, zero-shot RE (Levy et al., 2017) is proposed to invent new models to predict new relations.”
Background
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review