Cited by 764Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension

Open access
Levy, Omer, Seo, Minjoon, Choi, Eunsol, Zettlemoyer, Luke·2017·Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)

Abstract

We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot.This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relationextraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples.Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/k17-1034

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZsRE is a context-free question-answering dataset generated by BART with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.

    “ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a context-free question-answering (QA) dataset generated by BART (Lewis et al., 2020) with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.”

    From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017

    The Dataset section describes a QA dataset with human verification of question templates, supporting the dataset identification and quality-control parts. It says each example includes a sentence from which the answer is drawn, so it does not support calling the dataset context-free; it also does not address use in knowledge editing. The sentence cites Lewis et al. separately for BART, so that part is not assessed against Levy et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ZsRE is augmented with paraphrased variants of the original question and unrelated but structurally similar questions to test generalization and specificity.

    “To facilitate comprehensive assessment of model editing capabilities, the dataset is augmented with two types of auxiliary samples: (1) paraphrased variants of the original question, which test the model's ability to generalize the update, and (2) unrelated but structurally similar questions, which assess the specificity of the edit by ensuring unrelated knowledge remains unaffected.”

    From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017

    Section 6.2 (page unavailable) describes alternative question templates for the same relation and tests generalization to unseen phrasings. The paper does not describe augmenting ZsRE with unrelated, structurally similar questions to assess whether a model edit leaves unrelated knowledge unaffected; its experiments concern relation extraction, not model editing. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ZsRE is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.

    “ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.”

    From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017

    The Dataset section says the authors generated a large question-answering dataset, and the Setup and Experiments sections show its use to evaluate zero-shot relation extraction. These passages support identifying the dataset with Levy et al. (2017), but do not establish that it is widely adopted or used to evaluate factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ZsRE question-answering task is extensively studied within the model editing literature.

    “The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
  • Each ZsRE record contains an editing statement x_e, a paraphrase prompt x'_e, and a locality prompt x_loc.

    “where each record contains an editing statement x e , a paraphrase prompt x ′ e , and a locality prompt x loc .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
  2. Raphael Hoffmann, Congle Zhang, Xiao Ling, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Daniel S Weld. 2011. Knowledge- based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies- Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 541-550.
  3. Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, and Benjamin M. Marlin. 2013. Relation ex- traction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Proceedings of the 2013 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pages 74-84. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
Published
2017
Pages
333-342
OpenAlex
W2624677889
Cited by
482
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
FWCI
17.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
  • Nvidia
  • Tencent
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review