The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FFN-SkipLLM: A Hidden Gem for Autoregressive Decoding with Adaptive Feed Forward Skipping
Open accessAbstract
Autoregressive Large Language Models (e.g., LLaMa, GPTs) are omnipresent achieving remarkable success in language understanding and generation.However, such impressive capability typically comes with a substantial model size, which presents significant challenges for autoregressive token-by-token generation.To mitigate computation overload incurred during generation, several early-exit and layer-dropping strategies have been proposed.Despite some promising success due to the redundancy across LLMs layers on metrics like Rough-L/BLUE, our careful knowledgeintensive evaluation unveils issues such as generation collapse, hallucination, and noticeable performance drop even at the trivial exit ratio of ∼ 10-15% of layers.We attribute these errors primarily to ineffective handling of the KV cache through state copying during early exit.In this work, we observe the saturation of computationally expensive feed-forward blocks of LLM layers and propose FFN-SkipLLM, which is a novel fine-grained skip strategy for autoregressive LLMs.FFN-SkipLLM leverages an input-adaptive feed-forward skipping approach that can skip ∼ 25-30% of FFN blocks of LLMs with marginal change in performance on knowledge-intensive generation tasks without any requirement to handle the KV cache.Our extensive experiments and ablation studies across benchmarks like MT-Bench, Factoid-QA, and variable-length text summarization illustrate how our simple and easy-touse method can facilitate faster autoregressive decoding.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autoregressive decoding's sequential nature prohibits efficient parallelization, severely hindering inference throughput, especially in latency-sensitive deployment scenarios.
“This left-to-right decoding strategy, though optimal in terms of likelihood estimation, suffers from a fundamental limitation: the inherently sequential nature of generation prohibits efficient parallelization, severely hindering inference throughput, especially in latency-sensitive deployment scenarios.”
From Confidence-Modulated Speculative Decoding for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PointVLA: Injecting the 3D World Into Vision-Language-Action Models
Li, C., Wen, J., Peng, Y., Peng, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2026) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2026.3653303 · Cited by 100
SwiftKV: Fast Prefill-Optimized Inference with Knowledge-Preserving Model Transformation
Qiao, A., Yao, Z., Rajbhandari, S., & He, Y. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1306 · Cited by 10
Confidence-Modulated Speculative Decoding for Large Language Models
Sen, J., Dasgupta, S., & Waghela, H. (2025) · 2025 IEEE 6th India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON) · doi:10.1109/indiscon66021.2025.11254640
A Dynamic Inference Method for Autoregressive Transformer Models
Tian, H., Lu, S., Deng, H., Li, Z., & Dou, W. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) · doi:10.1109/icws67624.2025.00071
FiRST: Finetuning Router-Selective Transformers for Input-Adaptive Latency Reduction
Jain, A., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, K., & Pal, S. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1197
Deputy: Accelerating Large Language Model Inference with Dynamic Low-Rank Substitution
Zhou, Y., Weng, S., Zhou, C., Wu, Y., Qiao, Q., Gao, J., Yang, F., & Pan, A. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.991 · Cited by 1
Amiri, M., Mokari, A., & Bocklitz, T. W. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02369-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaiswal, A. K., Hu, B., Yin, L., Ro, Y., Chen, T., Liu, S., & Akella, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 16943-16956
- OpenAlex
- W4404783087
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- autoregressive decoding, large language models, early-exit networks, KV cache, power generation efficiency, hallucinations, text summarization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review