Cited by 7Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FFN-SkipLLM: A Hidden Gem for Autoregressive Decoding with Adaptive Feed Forward Skipping

Open access
Jaiswal, Ajay Kumar, Hu, Bodun, Yin, Lu, Ro, Yeonju, Chen, Tianlong, Liu, Shiwei, Akella, Aditya·2024·Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Autoregressive Large Language Models (e.g., LLaMa, GPTs) are omnipresent achieving remarkable success in language understanding and generation.However, such impressive capability typically comes with a substantial model size, which presents significant challenges for autoregressive token-by-token generation.To mitigate computation overload incurred during generation, several early-exit and layer-dropping strategies have been proposed.Despite some promising success due to the redundancy across LLMs layers on metrics like Rough-L/BLUE, our careful knowledgeintensive evaluation unveils issues such as generation collapse, hallucination, and noticeable performance drop even at the trivial exit ratio of ∼ 10-15% of layers.We attribute these errors primarily to ineffective handling of the KV cache through state copying during early exit.In this work, we observe the saturation of computationally expensive feed-forward blocks of LLM layers and propose FFN-SkipLLM, which is a novel fine-grained skip strategy for autoregressive LLMs.FFN-SkipLLM leverages an input-adaptive feed-forward skipping approach that can skip ∼ 25-30% of FFN blocks of LLMs with marginal change in performance on knowledge-intensive generation tasks without any requirement to handle the KV cache.Our extensive experiments and ablation studies across benchmarks like MT-Bench, Factoid-QA, and variable-length text summarization illustrate how our simple and easy-touse method can facilitate faster autoregressive decoding.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.941

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autoregressive decoding's sequential nature prohibits efficient parallelization, severely hindering inference throughput, especially in latency-sensitive deployment scenarios.

    “This left-to-right decoding strategy, though optimal in terms of likelihood estimation, suffers from a fundamental limitation: the inherently sequential nature of generation prohibits efficient parallelization, severely hindering inference throughput, especially in latency-sensitive deployment scenarios.”

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaiswal, A. K., Hu, B., Yin, L., Ro, Y., Chen, T., Liu, S., & Akella, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2024
Pages
16943-16956
OpenAlex
W4404783087
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
autoregressive decoding, large language models, early-exit networks, KV cache, power generation efficiency, hallucinations, text summarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review