Cited by 21Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

Volcano: Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination through Self-Feedback Guided Revision

Open access
Lee, Seongyun, Park, Sue Hyun, Jo, Yongrae, Seo, Minjoon·2024·Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Seongyun Lee, Sue Hyun Park, Yongrae Jo, Minjoon Seo. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.23

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some approaches are validated only on small, specific constraint sets, limiting their general applicability.

    “Some approaches are validated only on small, specific constraint sets, limiting their general applicability (Schick et al., 2023; Saunders et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2024; Mu et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022; Gou et al., 2024; Varshney et al., 2023).”

    From LLM Self-Correction with DeCRIM: Decompose, Critique, and Refine for Enhanced Following of Instructions with Multiple Constraints (2024) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024

    Section 4.1 (page unavailable) says VOLCANO was evaluated on five benchmarks spanning hallucination and general multimodal performance, including benchmarks with 9,000 and 4,377 questions. Appendix A (page unavailable) describes multiple task and question types. That is contrary to characterizing this approach as validated only on a small, specific constraint set; the paper’s Limitations section instead identifies execution time as its notable drawback. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, yelong shen, Yujiu Yang, Nan Duan, and Weizhu Chen. 2024. CRITIC: Large language models can self-correct with tool-interactive critiquing. In The Twelfth Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations.
  2. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023b. Improved baselines with visual instruc- tion tuning. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. 2023c. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485. · arXiv
  3. Muru Zhang, Ofir Press, William Merrill, Alisa Liu, and Noah A. Smith. 2023a. How language model hallucinations can snowball.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S., Park, S. H., Jo, Y., & Seo, M.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • LG AI Research (South Korea) (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2024
Pages
391-404
OpenAlex
W4401043235
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (2019-0-00075)
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2019-0-00075, No.2019-0-00075, 2022-0-00264)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2022-, 2019-0-00075)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
multimodal hallucination, hallucination mitigation, self-feedback, revision, large language models, multimodal models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review