Cited by 2Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty in Causality: A New Frontier

Open access
Cui, Shaobo, Mouchel, Luca, Faltings, Boi·2025·Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Understanding uncertainty in causality is vital in various domains, including core NLP tasks like event causality extraction, commonsense reasoning, and counterfactual text generation.However, existing literature lacks a comprehensive examination of this area.This survey aims to fill this gap by thoroughly reviewing the uncertainty in causality.We first introduce a novel trichotomy, categorizing causal uncertainty into aleatoric (inherent randomness in causal data), epistemic (causal model limitations), and ontological (existence of causal links) uncertainty.We then survey methods for quantifying uncertainty in causal analysis and highlight the complementary relationship between causal uncertainty and causal strength.Furthermore, we examine the challenges that large language models (LLMs) face in handling causal uncertainty, such as hallucinations and inconsistencies, and propose key traits for an optimal causal LLM.Our paper reviews current approaches and outlines future research directions, aiming to serve as a practical guide for researchers and practitioners in this emerging field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.396

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Causal relationships within the complex real world involve delayed outcomes and cascading effects.

    “Causal relationships within the complex real world involve delayed outcomes and cascading effects (Joshi et al., 2024; Cui et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025f).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cui, S., Mouchel, L., & Faltings, B.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2025
Pages
8022-8044
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412945632
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
causal uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, ontological uncertainty, causal strength, hallucinations, causal reasoning, commonsense reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review