The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic Parsing on Freebase from Question-Answer Pairs
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we train a semantic parser that scales up to Freebase.Instead of relying on annotated logical forms, which is especially expensive to obtain at large scale, we learn from question-answer pairs.The main challenge in this setting is narrowing down the huge number of possible logical predicates for a given question.We tackle this problem in two ways: First, we build a coarse mapping from phrases to predicates using a knowledge base and a large text corpus.Second, we use a bridging operation to generate additional predicates based on neighboring predicates.On the dataset of Cai and Yates (2013), despite not having annotated logical forms, our system outperforms their state-of-the-art parser.Additionally, we collected a more realistic and challenging dataset of question-answer pairs and improves over a natural baseline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning
Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka, E., & Mitchell, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7519 · Cited by 2,000
SUTime: A library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions
Chang, A. X., & Manning, C. (2012) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/5pi53hxdrsdt · Cited by 383
Cited by
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering
Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 · Cited by 3,575
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-T., Rocktäschel, T., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.11401 · Cited by 3,101
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590
“Next we study the variance of few-shot learning performance on the StoryCloze, Natural Questions, and Web Questions benchmarks presented in Section 6.1.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Berant, J., Chou, A., Frostig, R., & Liang, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 1533-1544
- OpenAlex
- W2252136820
- Cited by
- 1,517
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantic Parsing on Freebase from Question-Answer Pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/d13-1160
- The paper
- Berant, J., Chou, A., Frostig, R., & Liang, P. (2013). Semantic Parsing on Freebase from Question-Answer Pairs. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d13-1160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
