The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention-based LSTM Network for Cross-Lingual Sentiment Classification
Open accessAbstract
Most of the state-of-the-art sentiment classifi-cation methods are based on supervised learning algorithms which require large amounts of manually labeled data. However, the labeled resources are usually imbalanced in different languages. Cross-lingual sentiment classification tackles the problem by adapting the sentiment resources in a resource-rich language to resource-poor languages. In this study, we propose an attention-based bilingual representation learning model which learns the distributed semantics of the documents in both the source and the target languages. In each language, we use Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network to model the documents, which has been proved to be very effective for word sequences. Meanwhile, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism for the bilingual LSTM network. The sentence-level attention model learns which sentences of a document are more important for determining the overall sentiment while the word-level attention model learns which words in each sentence are decisive. The proposed model achieves good results on a benchmark dataset using English as the source language and Chinese as the target language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
Theano: new features and speed improvements
Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., Warde-Farley, D., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5590 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
Deep Learning--based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N., Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439726 · Cited by 1,538
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005 · Cited by 745
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2023) · Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_907-2 · Cited by 518
A Survey on Text Classification: From Traditional to Deep Learning
Li, Q., Peng, H., Li, J., Xia, C., Yang, R., Sun, L., Yu, P. S., & He, L. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3495162 · Cited by 494
Samant, R. M., Bachute, M. R., Gite, S., & Kotecha, K. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3149798 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Wan, X., & Xiao, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 247-256
- OpenAlex
- W2562439797
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attention-based LSTM Network for Cross-Lingual Sentiment Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18653/v1/d16-1024
- The paper
- Zhou, X., Wan, X., & Xiao, J. (2016). Attention-based LSTM Network for Cross-Lingual Sentiment Classification. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d16-1024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.