The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets
Open accessAbstract
Mor Geva, Yoav Goldberg, Jonathan Berant. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These large performance disparities across users are practical concerns in consumer-facing applications, and they can also indicate that models are exploiting biases or spurious correlations in the data (Badgeley et al., 2019; Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Performance disparities across individuals have been observed in a wide range of tasks and applications, including in natural language processing (Geva et al., 2019), automatic speech recognition (Koenecke et al., 2020; Tatman, 2017), federated learning (Li et al., 2019b; Caldas et al., 2018), and medical imaging (Badgeley et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“More directly, across a few natural language processing tasks where examples are annotated by crowdworkers, models have been observed to perform well on annotators that are commonly seen at training time, but fail to generalize to unseen annotators, suggesting that models are merely learning annotator-specific patterns and not the task (Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“These large performance disparities across users are practical concerns in consumer-facing applications, and they can also indicate that models are exploiting biases or spurious correlations in the data (Badgeley et al., 2019; Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1075 · Cited by 3,377
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering
Mihaylov, T., Clark, P. E., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1260 · Cited by 1,602
CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge
Talmor, A., Herzig, J., Lourie, N., & Berant, J. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1421 · Cited by 919
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 282
Natural Language Processing: Challenges and Future Directions
Kaddari, Z., Mellah, Y., Berrich, J., Belkasmi, M. G., & Bouchentouf, T. (2020) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53970-2_22 · Cited by 22
Multitask Personalized Recognition of Emotions Evoked by Textual Content
Miłkowski, P., Saganowski, S., Gruza, M., Kazienko, P., Piasecki, M., & Kocoń, J. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomworkshops53856.2022.9767502 · Cited by 20
Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptions
Krojer, B., Adlakha, V., Vineet, V., Goyal, Y., Ponti, E. M., & Reddy, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.241 · Cited by 38
Angler: Helping Machine Translation Practitioners Prioritize Model Improvements
Robertson, S., Wang, Z. J., Moritz, D., Kery, M. B., & Hohman, F. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580790 · Cited by 22
An Empirical Study of Invariant Risk MinimizationPreprint
Choe, Y. J., Ham, J., & Park, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05007 · Cited by 36
A Comprehensive Literature Review on Children’s Databases for Machine Learning Applications
Al-Azani, S., Sait, S. M., & Al-Utaibi, K. A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3146008 · Cited by 20
Sources of Uncertainty in Supervised Machine Learning—a Statisticians’ View
Gruber, C., Schenk, P. O., Schierholz, M., Kreuter, F., & Kauermann, G. (2026) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/25-sts1003 · Cited by 85
HINT: Integration Testing for AI-based features with Humans in the Loop
Chen, Q. Z., Schnabel, T., Nushi, B., & Amershi, S. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511141 · Cited by 24
Hidden Biases in Unreliable News Detection Datasets
Zhou, X., Elfardy, H., Christodoulopoulos, C., Butler, T., & Bansal, M. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.211 · Cited by 20
Investigating and Mitigating Biases in Crowdsourced Data
Hettiachchi, D., Sanderson, M., Gonçalves, J., Hosio, S. J., Kazai, G., Lease, M., Schaekermann, M., & Yılmaz, E. (2021) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3462204.3481729 · Cited by 17
Models in the Loop: Aiding Crowdworkers with Generative Annotation Assistants
Bartolo, M., Thrush, T., Riedel, S., Stenetorp, P., Jia, R., & Kiela, D. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.275 · Cited by 28
Kierszbaum, S., Klein, T., & Lapasset, L. (2022) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace9100591 · Cited by 20
Do We Need to Create Big Datasets to Learn a Task?
Mishra, S. R., & Sachdeva, B. (2020) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.sustainlp-1.23 · Cited by 19
SD-QA: Spoken Dialectal Question Answering for the Real World
Faisal, F., Keshava, S., Alam, M. M. I., & Anastasopoulos, A. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.281 · Cited by 26
Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation BenchmarkingPreprint
Ma, Z., Ethayarajh, K., Thrush, T., Jain, S., Wu, L., Jia, R., Potts, C., Williams, A., & Kiela, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.06052 · Cited by 21
Perceptual Score: What Data Modalities Does Your Model Perceive?Preprint
Gat, I., Schwartz, I., & Schwing, A. G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14375 · Cited by 20
DQI: Measuring Data Quality in NLPPreprint
Mishra, S. R., Arunkumar, A., Sachdeva, B., Bryan, C., & Baral, C. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.00816 · Cited by 38
Low-cost tree crown dieback estimation using deep learning-based segmentation
Allen, M. J., Moreno‐Fernández, D., Ruiz‐Benito, P., Grieve, S., & Lines, E. R. (2024) · Environmental Data Science · doi:10.1017/eds.2024.16 · Cited by 21
Uncovering labeler bias in machine learning annotation tasks
Haliburton, L., Leusmann, J., Welsch, R., Ghebremedhin, S., Isaakidis, P., Schmidt, A., & Mayer, S. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00572-w · Cited by 15
RUN through the Streets: A New Dataset and Baseline Models for Realistic Urban Navigation
Paz-Argaman, T., & Tsarfaty, R. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1681 · Cited by 15
Neural Conversational QA: Learning to Reason vs Exploiting Patterns
Verma, N., Sharma, A., Madan, D., Contractor, D., Kumar, H., & Joshi, S. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.589 · Cited by 14
Gupta, V., Bhat, R. A., Ghosal, A., Shrivastava, M., Singh, M., & Srikumar, V. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00482 · Cited by 16
Benchmarking Multimodal Regex Synthesis with Complex Structures
Ye, X., Chen, Q., Dillig, I., & Durrett, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.541 · Cited by 14
What’s the Meaning of Superhuman Performance in Today’s NLU?
Tedeschi, S., Bos, J., Declerck, T., Hajič, J., Hershcovich, D., Hovy, E. H., Koller, A., Krek, S., Schockaert, S., Sennrich, R., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.697 · Cited by 25
Kirk, H. R., Bean, A., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P., & Hale, S. A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.148 · Cited by 48
HardEval: Focusing on Challenging Tokens to Assess Robustness of NER.
Bernier-Colborne, G., & Langlais, P. (2020) · NPARC · Cited by 12
Detecting Community Sensitive Norm Violations in Online Conversations
Park, C. Y., Mendelsohn, J., Radhakrishnan, K., Jain, K., Kanakagiri, T., Jurgens, D., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.288 · Cited by 14
Analyzing Dynamic Adversarial Training Data in the Limit
Wallace, E., Williams, A., Jia, R., & Kiela, D. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.18 · Cited by 25
Incorporating Stock Market Signals for Twitter Stance Detection
Conforti, C., Berndt, J., Pilehvar, M. T., Giannitsarou, C., Toxvaerd, F., & Collier, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.281 · Cited by 13
Evidence-based Verification for Real World Information Needs.Preprint
Thorne, J. P., Glockner, M., Vallejo, G., Vlachos, A., & Gurevych, I. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 13
Leveraging Digital Intelligence for Community Well-Being
Narayan, R. (2020) · International Journal of Community Well-Being · doi:10.1007/s42413-020-00085-4 · Cited by 14
ePiC: Employing Proverbs in Context as a Benchmark for Abstract Language Understanding
Ghosh, S., & Srivastava, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.276 · Cited by 19
Multi-Step Inference for Reasoning Over Paragraphs
Liu, J., Gardner, M., Cohen, S. B., & Lapata, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.245 · Cited by 18
tWT–WT: A Dataset to Assert the Role of Target Entities for Detecting Stance of Tweets
Kaushal, A., Saha, A., & Ganguly, N. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.303 · Cited by 12
Latent Space Explanation by Intervention
Gat, I., Lorberbom, G., Schwartz, I., & Hazan, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19948 · Cited by 14
Project PIAF: Building a Native French Question-Answering DatasetPreprint
Keraron, R., Lancrenon, G., Bras, M., Allary, F., Moyse, G., Scialom, T., Soriano-Morales, E.-P., & Staiano, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00968 · Cited by 15
Mitigating Large Language Model Bias: Automated Dataset Augmentation and Prejudice Quantification
Mondal, D., & Lipizzi, C. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13060141 · Cited by 10
The Authenticity Gap in Human Evaluation
Ethayarajh, K., & Jurafsky, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.406 · Cited by 10
Bertaglia, T., Huber, S., Goanță, C., Spanakis, G., & Iamnitchi, A. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44067-0_11 · Cited by 13
What Sounds “Right” to Me? Experiential Factors in the Perception of Political Ideology
Shen, Q., & Rosé, C. P. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.152 · Cited by 10
Annotation Curricula to Implicitly Train Non-Expert Annotators
Lee, J.-U., Klie, J.-C., & Gurevych, I. (2022) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00436 · Cited by 13
Voutsa, M. C., Tsapatsoulis, N., & Djouvas, C. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6080178 · Cited by 10
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models
Kodner, J., & Gupta, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.160 · Cited by 13
Shinoda, K., Sugawara, S., & Aizawa, A. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.21 · Cited by 10
Toward Annotator Group Bias in Crowdsourcing
Liu, H., Thekinen, J., Mollaoglu, S., Tang, D. Q., Yang, J. S., Cheng, Y., Liu, H., & Tang, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.126 · Cited by 16
Robust Domain Adaptation: Representations, Weights and Inductive Bias
Bouvier, V., Very, P., Chastagnol, C., Tami, M., & Hudelot, C. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67658-2_21 · Cited by 9
I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue ModelingPreprint
Nie, Y., Williamson, M., Bansal, M., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13391 · Cited by 9
A Survey on Out-of-Distribution Evaluation of Neural NLP Models
Li, X., Liu, M., Gao, S. B., & Buntine, W. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/749 · Cited by 25
Exploring the occupational biases and stereotypes of Chinese large language models
Jiang, L., Zhu, G., Sun, J., Cao, J., & Wu, J. X. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03893-w · Cited by 9
A Linguistic Analysis of Visually Grounded Dialogues Based on Spatial Expressions
Udagawa, T., Yamazaki, T., & Aizawa, A. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.67 · Cited by 9
Bhatt, S., Jain, R., Dandapat, S., & Sitaram, S. (2021) · Cited by 8
Li, S., Han, C., Yu, P., Edwards, C., Li, M., Wang, X., Fung, Y. R., Yu, C., Tetreault, J., Hovy, E. H., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.799 · Cited by 11
Yadav, V., Bethard, S. J., & Surdeanu, M. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.363 · Cited by 9
SyGNS: A Systematic Generalization Testbed Based on Natural Language Semantics
Yanaka, H., Mineshima, K., & Inui, K. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.10 · Cited by 10
Interpretable modular knowledge reasoning for machine reading comprehension
Ren, M., Huang, H., & Gao, Y. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-06975-2 · Cited by 8
Bias Mitigation for Toxicity Detection via Sequential Decisions
Cheng, L., Mosallanezhad, A., Silva, Y. N., Hall, D. L., & Liu, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531945 · Cited by 8
Curing the SICK and Other NLI Maladies
Kalouli, A.-L., Hu, H., Webb, A. F., Moss, L. S., & de Paiva, V. (2022) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00465 · Cited by 8
On Learning Interpreted Languages with Recurrent Models
Paperno, D. (2022) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00431 · Cited by 7
Bias-aware ranking from pairwise comparisons
Ferrara, A., Bonchi, F., Fabbri, F., Karimi, F., & Wagner, C. (2024) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-024-01024-z · Cited by 7
Klenner, M., Göhring, A., & Amsler, M. (2020) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-197961 · Cited by 7
Effects of Naturalistic Variation in Goal-Oriented Dialog
Ganhotra, J., Moore, R. J., Joshi, S., & Wadhawan, K. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.358 · Cited by 7
Robustness and Sensitivity of BERT Models Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease from Text
Novikova, J. (2021) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.37 · Cited by 11
Investigating Multi-source Active Learning for Natural Language Inference
Snijders, A., Kiela, D., & Margatina, K. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.160 · Cited by 10
Yao, B., Jindal, I., Popa, L. C., Katsis, Y., Ghosh, S., He, L., Lu, Y., Srivastava, S., Li, Y., Hendler, J., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.778 · Cited by 10
Pradhan, V. K., Schaekermann, M., & Lease, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.828187 · Cited by 7
An Information Retrieval Approach to Building Datasets for Hate Speech DetectionPreprint
Rahman, M. M., Balakrishnan, D., Murthy, D., Kutlu, M., & Lease, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09775 · Cited by 16
Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations
Zhao, W., Chiu, J., Cardie, C., & Rush, A. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.831 · Cited by 18
Kunz, J. (2024) · Linköping studies in science and technology. Dissertations · doi:10.3384/9789180754712 · Cited by 7
On the (In)Effectiveness of Images for Text Classification
Ma, C., Shen, A., Yoshikawa, H., Iwakura, T., Beck, D., & Baldwin, T. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.4 · Cited by 7
Investigating Labeler Bias in Face Annotation for Machine Learning
Haliburton, L., Ghebremedhin, S., Welsch, R., Schmidt, A., & Mayer, S. (2024) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia240191 · Cited by 10
Maveli, N. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.67 · Cited by 6
You Are What You Tweet: Profiling Users by Past Tweets to Improve Hate Speech Detection
Chaudhry, P., & Lease, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96960-8_13 · Cited by 6
Towards Interpretable Reasoning over Paragraph Effects in Situation
Ren, M., Geng, X., Qin, T., Huang, H., & Jiang, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.548 · Cited by 6
Natural Language Inference with Mixed EffectsPreprint
Gantt, W., Kane, B., & White, A. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10501 · Cited by 6
Scheuerman, M. K., Woodruff, A., & Brubaker, J. R. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757481 · Cited by 7
You Are What You Annotate: Towards Better Models through Annotator Representations
Deng, N., Zhang, X., Liu, S., Wu, W. M. C., Wang, L., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.832 · Cited by 19
Investigating Annotator Bias in Abusive Language Datasets
Wich, M., Widmer, C., Hagerer, G., & Groh, G. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_170 · Cited by 12
Explanation-based Finetuning Makes Models More Robust to Spurious Cues
Ludan, J. M., Meng, Y., Nguyen, T. D., Shah, S. A., Lyu, Q., Apidianaki, M., & Callison-Burch, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.242 · Cited by 10
Annotation Sensitivity: Training Data Collection Methods Affect Model Performance
Kern, C. A., Eckman, S., Beck, J., Chew, R., Ma, B., & Kreuter, F. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.992 · Cited by 6
Weber, L., Bruni, E., & Hupkes, D. (2023) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-1.20 · Cited by 25
Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Language
Efrat, A., Shaham, U., Kilman, D., & Levy, O. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.344 · Cited by 5
Thorn Jakobsen, T., & Rogers, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.354 · Cited by 1
Unifying Data Perspectivism and Personalization: An Application to Social Norms
Plepi, J., Neuendorf, B., Flek, L., & WELCH, C. A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.500 · Cited by 7
CRoW: Benchmarking Commonsense Reasoning in Real-World Tasks
Ismayilzada, M., Paul, D., Montariol, S., Geva, M., & Bosselut, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.607 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAssessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation
Jain, R. (2024) · International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaaic60222.2024.10575537 · Cited by 6
Posthoc Verification and the Fallibility of the Ground Truth
Ding, Y., Botzer, N., & Weninger, T. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.dadc-1.3 · Cited by 6
Unsupervised Explanation Generation via Correct Instantiations
Cheng, S., Wu, Z., Chen, J., Li, Z., Liu, Y., & Kong, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26494 · Cited by 5
Ryu, W., Song, J. W., Lim, J., Lee, J. H., Sunwoo, L., Kim, D., Kim, D., Bae, H., Lee, M., & Kim, B. J. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70602 · Cited by 3
Modelling Speaker Attribution in Narrative Texts With Biased and Bias-Adjustable Neural Networks
Dönicke, T., Varachkina, H., Weimer, A. M., Gödeke, L., Barth, F., Gittel, B., Holler, A., & Sporleder, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.725321 · Cited by 3
Interventional Training for Out-Of-Distribution Natural Language Understanding
Yu, S., Jiang, J., Zhang, H., Niu, Y., Sun, Q., & Bing, L. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.799 · Cited by 3
Caron, M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020933 · Cited by 3
Fekih, S., Tamagnone, N., Minixhofer, B., Shrestha, R., Contla, X., Oglethorpe, E., & Rekabsaz, N. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.321 · Cited by 3
Cascading Biases: Investigating the Effect of Heuristic Annotation Strategies on Data and Models
Malaviya, C., Bhatia, S., & Yatskar, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.438 · Cited by 3
SeSQL: A High-Quality Large-Scale Session-Level Chinese Text-to-SQL Dataset
Huang, S., Wang, L., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Dou, C., Yan, F., Xiao, X., Wu, H. R., & Zhang, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44693-1_42 · Cited by 3
Whose truth is it anyway? An experiment on annotation bias in times of factual opinion polarization
van der Velden, M. A. C. G., Löecherbach, F., van Atteveldt, W., Fokkens, A. S., Reuver, M., & Welbers, K. (2025) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2025.2562034 · Cited by 3
August, T., Sap, M., Clark, E., Reinecke, K., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nuse-1.6 · Cited by 3
Building Low-Resource NER Models Using Non-Speaker Annotations
Tsygankova, T., Marini, F., Mayhew, S., & Roth, D. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.dash-1.11 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Geva, M., Goldberg, Y., & Berant, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1161-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2969282158
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 19.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Tel Aviv University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- annotator bias, dataset construction, task modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review