The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets
Open accessAbstract
Mor Geva, Yoav Goldberg, Jonathan Berant. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These large performance disparities across users are practical concerns in consumer-facing applications, and they can also indicate that models are exploiting biases or spurious correlations in the data (Badgeley et al., 2019; Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Performance disparities across individuals have been observed in a wide range of tasks and applications, including in natural language processing (Geva et al., 2019), automatic speech recognition (Koenecke et al., 2020; Tatman, 2017), federated learning (Li et al., 2019b; Caldas et al., 2018), and medical imaging (Badgeley et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“More directly, across a few natural language processing tasks where examples are annotated by crowdworkers, models have been observed to perform well on annotators that are commonly seen at training time, but fail to generalize to unseen annotators, suggesting that models are merely learning annotator-specific patterns and not the task (Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“These large performance disparities across users are practical concerns in consumer-facing applications, and they can also indicate that models are exploiting biases or spurious correlations in the data (Badgeley et al., 2019; Geva et al., 2019).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Geva et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107
Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages
McNemar, Q. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295996 · Cited by 4,754
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1075 · Cited by 3,377
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering
Mihaylov, T., Clark, P. E., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1260 · Cited by 1,602
CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge
Talmor, A., Herzig, J., Lourie, N., & Berant, J. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1421 · Cited by 919
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Shortcut learning in deep neural networks
Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.-H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Wichmann, F. A. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z · Cited by 2,224
Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w · Cited by 1,046
“Such bias stems not only during the generation or collection, but is also a result of annotation, when data is assigned semantic meaning (Geva et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBeyond accuracy: behavioral testing of NLP models with CheckList
Ribeiro, M. T., Wu, T., Guestrin, C., & Singh, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.442 · Cited by 890
Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding
Nie, Y., Williams, A., Dinan, E., Bansal, M., Weston, J., & Kiela, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.441 · Cited by 656
An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Prediction
Larson, S., Mahendran, A., Peper, J. J., Clarke, C., Lee, A., Hill, P., Kummerfeld, J. K., Leach, K., Laurenzano, M. A., Tang, L., et al. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1131 · Cited by 535
WinoGrande: an adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale
Sakaguchi, K., Bras, R. L., Bhagavatula, C., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3474381 · Cited by 356
WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518
“Performance disparities across individuals have been observed in a wide range of tasks and applications, including in natural language processing (Geva et al., 2019), automatic speech recognition (Koenecke et al., 2020; Tatman, 2017), federated learning (Li et al., 2019; Caldas et al., 2018), and…”
InfluentialEvaluating Models’ Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets
Gardner, M., Artzi, Y., Basmov, V., Berant, J., Bogin, B., Chen, S., Dasigi, P., Dua, D., Elazar, Y., Gottumukkala, A., et al. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.117 · Cited by 323
Self-citationDid Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies
Geva, M., Khashabi, D., Segal, E., Khot, T., Roth, D., & Berant, J. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00370 · Cited by 242
Self-citationNeural Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in NLP—A Survey
Ramponi, A., & Plank, B. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.603 · Cited by 311
CommonGen: A constrained text generation challenge for generative commonsense reasoning
Lin, B. Y., Zhou, W., Shen, M., Zhou, P., Bhagavatula, C., Choi, Y., & Ren, X. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.165 · Cited by 239
Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotations
Davani, A. M., Díaz, M., & Prabhakaran, V. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00449 · Cited by 294
Foundations & Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions
Liang, P. P., Zadeh, A., & Morency, L. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3656580 · Cited by 438
Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents’ Ability to Blend Skills
Smith, E. M., Williamson, M., Shuster, K., Weston, J., & Boureau, Y.-L. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.183 · Cited by 207
Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detection
Vidgen, B., Thrush, T., Waseem, Z., & Kiela, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.132 · Cited by 174
Gender Bias in Machine Translation
Savoldi, B., Gaido, M., Bentivogli, L., Negri, M., & Turchi, M. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00401 · Cited by 229
Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Models
West, P., Bhagavatula, C., Hessel, J., Hwang, J. D., Jiang, L., Bras, R. J. L., Lu, X., Welleck, S., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.341 · Cited by 209
Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection
Sap, M., Swayamdipta, S., Vianna, L., Zhou, X., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.431 · Cited by 224
QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension
Rogers, A., Gardner, M., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560260 · Cited by 213
Feng, S., Park, C. Y., Liu, Y., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.656 · Cited by 149
Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Business and Industry
Bharadiya, J. P., Thomas, R. K., & Ahmed, F. (2023) · Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · doi:10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i3893 · Cited by 152
Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey
Lyu, Q., Apidianaki, M., & Callison-Burch, C. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00511 · Cited by 196
Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?
Miceli, M., Posada, J., & Yang, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3492853 · Cited by 125
WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creation
Liu, A., Swayamdipta, S., Smith, N. A., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.508 · Cited by 178
Bugliarello, E., Cotterell, R., Okazaki, N., & Elliott, D. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00408 · Cited by 133
Offensive, aggressive, and hate speech analysis: From data-centric to human-centered approach
Kocoń, J., Figas, A., Gruza, M., Puchalska, D., Kajdanowicz, T., & Kazienko, P. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102643 · Cited by 103
Reasoning Over Paragraph Effects in Situations
Lin, K., Tafjord, O., Clark, P. E., & Gardner, M. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5808 · Cited by 110
Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey
Wang, X., Wang, H., & Yang, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.339 · Cited by 90
Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations
Wiegreffe, S., Hessel, J., Swayamdipta, S., Riedl, M. O., & Choi, Y. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.47 · Cited by 121
Generalization in NLI: Ways (Not) To Go Beyond Simple Heuristics
Bhargava, P., Валентинович, Д. А., & Rogers, A. (2021) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.insights-1.18 · Cited by 96
A Checklist to Combat Cognitive Biases in Crowdsourcing
Draws, T., Rieger, A., Inel, O., Gadiraju, U., & Tintarev, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v9i1.18939 · Cited by 86
TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions
Qiang, N., Wu, H., Han, R., Peng, N., Gardner, M., & Roth, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.88 · Cited by 92
OCNLI: Original Chinese Natural Language Inference
Hu, H., Richardson, K., Xu, L. J., Li, L., Kübler, S., & Moss, L. S. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.314 · Cited by 112
Identifying and Measuring Annotator Bias Based on Annotators’ Demographic Characteristics
Kuwatly, H. A., Wich, M., & Groh, G. (2020) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.21 · Cited by 102
Stance Detection Benchmark: How Robust is Your Stance Detection?
Schiller, B., Daxenberger, J., & Gurevych, I. (2021) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-021-00714-w · Cited by 92
Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data
Gardner, M., Merrill, W., Dodge, J., Peters, M., Ross, A., Singh, S., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.135 · Cited by 81
MisRoBÆRTa: Transformers versus Misinformation
Truică, C., & Apostol, E. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10040569 · Cited by 78
Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning StrategiesPreprint
Geva, M., Khashabi, D., Segal, E., Khot, T., Roth, D., & Berant, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02235 · Cited by 70
Self-citationImproving Question Answering Model Robustness with Synthetic Adversarial Data Generation
Bartolo, M., Thrush, T., Jia, R., Riedel, S., Stenetorp, P., & Kiela, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.696 · Cited by 94
Getting Closer to AI Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Real Tasks
Rogers, A., Kovaleva, O., Downey, M., & Rumshisky, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6398 · Cited by 73
Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research
Paullada, A., Raji, I. D., Bender, E. M., Denton, E., & Hanna, A. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100336 · Cited by 548
Semantic Answer Similarity for Evaluating Question Answering Models
Risch, J., Möller, T., Gutsch, J., & Pietsch, M. (2021) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.mrqa-1.15 · Cited by 66
Gender biases within Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: Evidence, Sources of Biases and Solutions
Ho, J. Q. H., Hartanto, A., Koh, A., & Majeed, N. M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145 · Cited by 83
More Bang for Your Buck: Natural Perturbation for Robust Question Answering
Khashabi, D., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.12 · Cited by 62
Learning from Task Descriptions
Weller, O., Lourie, N., Gardner, M., & Peters, M. E. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.105 · Cited by 67
MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and ImagesPreprint
Talmor, A., Yoran, O., Catav, A., Lahav, D., Wang, Y., Asai, A., Ilharco, G., Hajishirzi, H., & Berant, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.06039 · Cited by 149
Self-citationTeach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable NLP.Preprint
Wiegreffe, S., & Marasović, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 57
Impact of politically biased data on hate speech classification
Wich, M., Bauer, J., & Groh, G. (2020) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.7 · Cited by 54
Prompting Contrastive Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning Tasks
Paranjape, B., Michael, J., Ghazvininejad, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.366 · Cited by 64
Evaluating NLP Models via Contrast SetsPreprint
Gardner, M., Artzi, Y., Basmova, V., Berant, J., Bogin, B., Chen, S., Dasigi, P., Dua, D., Elazar, Y., Gottumukkala, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 65
Self-citationTeach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Wiegreffe, S., & Marasović, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.12060 · Cited by 128
Changing the World by Changing the Data
Rogers, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.170 · Cited by 51
Intrinsic Evaluation of Summarization Datasets
Bommasani, R., & Cardie, C. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.649 · Cited by 60
I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modeling
Nie, Y., Williamson, M., Bansal, M., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.134 · Cited by 66
Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasets
Wu, Y., Gardner, M., Stenetorp, P., & Dasigi, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.190 · Cited by 69
Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wild
Klie, J.-C., de Castilho, R. E., & Gurevych, I. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00516 · Cited by 66
Hate Speech Classifiers Learn Normative Social Stereotypes
Davani, A. M., Atari, M., Kennedy, B., & Dehghani, M. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00550 · Cited by 73
Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Models
Röttger, P., Seelawi, H., Nozza, D., Talat, Z., & Vidgen, B. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.15 · Cited by 61
Explaining Question Answering Models through Text GenerationPreprint
Latcinnik, V., & Berant, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05569 · Cited by 60
Self-citationZeinert, P., Inie, N., & Derczynski, L. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.247 · Cited by 49
Don’t Blame the Annotator: Bias Already Starts in the Annotation Instructions
Parmar, M., Mishra, S. R., Geva, M., & Baral, C. R. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.130 · Cited by 59
Self-citationContext-aware Adversarial Training for Name Regularity Bias in Named Entity Recognition
Ghaddar, A., Langlais, P., Rashid, A., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00386 · Cited by 40
Evaluating Models' Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast SetsPreprint
Gardner, M., Artzi, Y., Basmova, V., Berant, J., Bogin, B., Chen, S., Dasigi, P., Dua, D., Elazar, Y., Gottumukkala, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02709 · Cited by 132
Self-citationA taxonomy and review of generalization research in NLPPreprint
Hupkes, D., Giulianelli, M., Dankers, V., Artetxe, M., Elazar, Y., Pimentel, T., Christodoulopoulos, C., Lasri, K., Saphra, N., Sinclair, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000638992 · Cited by 41
Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Survey
Kumar, S., Balachandran, V., Njoo, L., Anastasopoulos, A., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.241 · Cited by 38
Flemotomos, N., Martínez, V. R., Chen, Z., Creed, T. A., Atkins, D. C., & Narayanan, S. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258639 · Cited by 48
Goankar, B., Cook, K., & Macyszyn, L. J. (2020) · AI Ethics Journal · doi:10.47289/aiej20200916 · Cited by 43
Kennedy, C. J., Bacon, G., Sahn, A., & von Vacano, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.10277 · Cited by 140
Personal Bias in Prediction of Emotions Elicited by Textual Opinions
Miłkowski, P., Gruza, M., Kanclerz, K., Kazienko, P., Grimling, D., & Kocoń, J. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.26 · Cited by 34
HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models
Röttger, P., Vidgen, B., Nguyen, D., Waseem, Z., Margetts, H. Z., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.4 · Cited by 287
Bastings, J., Ebert, S., Zablotskaia, P., Sandholm, A., & Filippova, K. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.64 · Cited by 65
Mavi, V., Jangra, A., & Jatowt, A. (2024) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000102 · Cited by 119
The Curse of Performance Instability in Analysis Datasets: Consequences, Source, and Suggestions
Zhou, X., Nie, Y., Tan, H., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.659 · Cited by 32
What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia Nerds
Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Börschinger, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.662 · Cited by 31
Investigating Annotator Bias with a Graph-Based Approach
Wich, M., Kuwatly, H. A., & Groh, G. (2020) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.22 · Cited by 32
Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP
Prabhumoye, S., Boldt, B., Salakhutdinov, R., & Black, A. W. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.297 · Cited by 35
COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary Sentences
Singh, S., Wen, N., Hou, Y., Alipoormolabashi, P., Wu, T.-L., Ma, X., & Peng, N. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.78 · Cited by 48
ANLIzing the Adversarial Natural Language Inference DatasetPreprint
Williams, A., Thrush, T., & Kiela, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12729 · Cited by 40
Shortcutted Commonsense: Data Spuriousness in Deep Learning of Commonsense Reasoning
Branco, R., Branco, A., Rodrigues, J. A., & Silva, J. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.113 · Cited by 36
Textual Entailment for Event Argument Extraction: Zero- and Few-Shot with Multi-Source Learning
Sainz, O., González-Dios, I., de Lacalle, O. L., Min, B., & Agirre, E. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.187 · Cited by 31
Minimizing bias when using artificial intelligence in critical care medicine
Ranard, B. L., Park, S., Jia, Y., Zhang, Y., Alwan, F. S., Celi, L. A., & Lusczek, E. R. (2024) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154796 · Cited by 27
Lee, M.-W., Won, S., Kim, J., Lee, H., Park, C., & Jung, K. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482078 · Cited by 27
CREAK: A Dataset for Commonsense Reasoning over Entity KnowledgePreprint
Onoe, Y., Zhang, M. J. Q., Choi, E., & Durrett, G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01653 · Cited by 61
Logiqa 2.0—An improved dataset for logical reasoning in natural language understanding
Liu, H., Liu, J., Cui, L., Teng, Z., Duan, N., Zhou, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3293046 · Cited by 26
Benefits of Intermediate Annotations in Reading Comprehension
Dua, D., Singh, S., & Gardner, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.497 · Cited by 26
Linguistically-Informed Transformations (LIT): A Method for Automatically Generating Contrast Sets
Li, C., Shengshuo, L., Liu, Z., Wu, X., Zhou, X., & Steinert‐Threlkeld, S. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.12 · Cited by 30
Sachdeva, P., Barreto, R., von Vacano, C., & Kennedy, C. J. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533216 · Cited by 25
Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?Preprint
Miceli, M., Posada, J., & Yang, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08131 · Cited by 25
Data-QuestEval: A Referenceless Metric for Data-to-Text Semantic Evaluation
Rebuffel, C., Scialom, T., Soulier, L., Piwowarski, B., Lamprier, S., Staiano, J., Scoutheeten, G., & Gallinari, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.633 · Cited by 24
Reliability Testing for Natural Language Processing Systems
Tan, S., Joty, S., Baxter, K., Taeihagh, A., Bennett, G. A., & Kan, M. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.321 · Cited by 31
Nangia, N., Sugawara, S., Trivedi, H. K., Warstadt, A., Vania, C., & Bowman, S. R. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.98 · Cited by 29
Bitton, Y., Stanovsky, G., Schwartz, R., & Elhadad, M. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.9 · Cited by 31
Liu, Z., Peach, R. L., Lawrance, E., Noble, A., Ungless, M. A., & Barahona, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.779091 · Cited by 24
Quizbowl: The Case for Incremental Question AnsweringPreprint
Rodríguez, P., Feng, S., Iyyer, M., He, H., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.04792 · Cited by 47
Promoting Graph Awareness in Linearized Graph-to-Text Generation
Hoyle, A., Marasović, A., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.82 · Cited by 20
Does Putting a Linguist in the Loop Improve NLU Data Collection?
Parrish, A., Huang, W., Agha, O., Lee, S.-H., Nangia, N., Warstadt, A., Aggarwal, K., Allaway, E., Linzen, T., & Bowman, S. R. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.421 · Cited by 23
Digital History and Hermeneutics
University of Luxembourg, de la Recherche, F. N., Fickers, A., & Tatarinov, J. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110723991 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Geva, M., Goldberg, Y., & Berant, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1161-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2969282158
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 19.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Tel Aviv University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- annotator bias, dataset construction, task modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review