The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Web as a Knowledge-Base for Answering Complex Questions
Open accessAbstract
Alon Talmor, Jonathan Berant. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“As for other KBQA datasets, e.g., ComplexWebQuestions (Talmor and Berant, 2018), the proportion of implicit relations is also small.”
From Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2022) · cites this paper as Talmor and Berant, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Y. Artzi and L. Zettlemoyer. 2013. Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instruc- tions to actions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL) 1:49-62.
- J. Bao, N. Duan, Z. Yan, M. Zhou, and T. Zhao. 2016. Constraint-based question answering with knowl- edge graph. In International Conference on Com- putational Linguistics (COLING).
- J. Berant, A. Chou, R. Frostig, and P. Liang. 2013. Se- mantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- J. Berant and P. Liang. 2015. Imitation learning of agenda-based semantic parsers. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL) 3:545-558.
- K. Bollacker, C. Evans, P. Paritosh, T. Sturge, and J. Taylor. 2008. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD). pages 1247-1250.
- C. Buck, J. Bulian, M. Ciaramita, A. Gesmundo, N. Houlsby, W. Gajewski, and W. Wang. 2017. Ask the right questions: Active question reformu- lation with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07830 . · arXiv
- D. Chen, J. Bolton, and C. D. Manning. 2016. A thor- ough examination of the CNN / Daily Mail reading comprehension task. In Association for Computa- tional Linguistics (ACL).
- D. Chen, A. Fisch, J. Weston, and A. Bordes. 2017. Reading Wikipedia to answer open-domain ques- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00051 . · arXiv
- K. Cho, B. van Merriënboer, D. Bahdanau, and Y. Ben- gio. 2014. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1259 . · arXiv
- C. Clark and M. Gardner. 2017. Simple and effec- tive multi-paragraph reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10723 . · arXiv
- J. Duchi, E. Hazan, and Y. Singer. 2010. Adaptive sub- gradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. In Conference on Learning Theory (COLT).
- M. Dunn, , L. Sagun, M. Higgins, U. Guney, V. Cirik, and K. Cho. 2017. SearchQA: A new Q&A dataset augmented with context from a search engine. arXiv .
- K. Guu, P. Pasupat, E. Z. Liu, and P. Liang. 2017. From language to programs: Bridging reinforce- ment learning and maximum marginal likelihood. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- K. M. Hermann, T. Koisk, E. Grefenstette, L. Espe- holt, W. Kay, M. Suleyman, and P. Blunsom. 2015. Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
- D. Hewlett, A. Lacoste, L. Jones, I. Polosukhin, A. Fandrianto, J. Han, M. Kelcey, and D. Berthelot. 2016. Wikireading: A novel large-scale language understanding task over Wikipedia. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- F. Hill, A. Bordes, S. Chopra, and J. Weston. 2015. The goldilocks principle: Reading children's books with explicit memory representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
- M. Iyyer, W. Yih, and M. Chang. 2016. Answering complicated question intents expressed in decom- posed question sequences. CoRR 0.
- R. Jia and P. Liang. 2017. Adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems. In Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- M. Joshi, E. Choi, D. Weld, and L. Zettlemoyer. 2017. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised chal- lenge dataset for reading comprehension. In Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- J. Krishnamurthy and T. Mitchell. 2012. Weakly supervised training of semantic parsers. In Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP/CoNLL). pages 754-765.
- T. Kwiatkowski, E. Choi, Y. Artzi, and L. Zettlemoyer. 2013. Scaling semantic parsers with on-the-fly on- tology matching. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- G. Lai, Q. Xie, H. Liu, Y. Yang, and E. Hovy. 2017. Race: Large-scale reading comprehen- sion dataset from examinations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04683 . · arXiv
- K. lee, M. Lewis, and L. Zettlemoyer. 2016. Global neural CCG parsing with optimality guarantees. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- P. Liang. 2013. Lambda dependency-based composi- tional semantics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.4408 . · arXiv
- P. Liang, M. I. Jordan, and D. Klein. 2011. Learn- ing dependency-based compositional semantics. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). pages 590-599.
- T. Nguyen, M. Rosenberg, X. Song, J. Gao, S. Tiwary, R. Majumder, and L. Deng. 2016. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. In Workshop on Cognitive Computing at NIPS.
- R. Nogueira and K. Cho. 2016. End-to-end goal-driven web navigation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
- T. Onishi, H. Wang, M. Bansal, K. Gimpel, and D. McAllester. 2016. Who did what: A large-scale person-centered cloze dataset. In Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- P. Pasupat and P. Liang. 2015. Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- M. Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. MIT Press.
- I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). pages 3104-3112.
- O. Vinyals, M. Fortunato, and N. Jaitly. 2015. Pointer networks. In Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NIPS). pages 2674-2682.
- W. Wang, N. Yang, F. Wei, B. Chang, and M. Zhou. 2017. Gated self-matching networks for reading comprehension and question answering. In Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- Y. Wang, J. Berant, and P. Liang. 2015. Building a semantic parser overnight. In Association for Com- putational Linguistics (ACL).
- Y. Watanabe, B. Dhingra, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2017. Question answering from unstructured text by retrieval and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08885 . · arXiv
- J. Welbl, P. Stenetorp, and S. Riedel. 2017. Construct- ing datasets for multi-hop reading comprehension across documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06481 . · arXiv
- W. Yih, M. Richardson, C. Meek, M. Chang, and J. Suh. 2016. The value of semantic parse labeling for knowledge base question answering. In Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
- M. Zelle and R. J. Mooney. 1996. Learning to parse database queries using inductive logic program- ming. In Association for the Advancement of Arti- ficial Intelligence (AAAI). pages 1050-1055.
- L. S. Zettlemoyer and M. Collins. 2005. Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classifica- tion with probabilistic categorial grammars. In Un- certainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI). pages 658- 666.
- V. Zhong, C. Xiong, and R. Socher. 2017. Seq2sql: Generating structured queries from natural lan- guage using reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.00103 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 529
Answering Open-Domain Questions of Varying Reasoning Steps from Text
Qi, P., Lee, H., Sido, O. T., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.292 · Cited by 65
Obtaining Faithful Interpretations from Compositional Neural Networks
Subramanian, S., Bogin, B., Gupta, N., Wolfson, T., Singh, S., Berant, J., & Gardner, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.495 · Cited by 44
Self-citation(2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.364 · Cited by 38
Self-citationA dataset and baselines for sequential open-domain question answering
Elgohary, A., Zhao, C., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1134 · Cited by 42
Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought
Yoran, O., Wolfson, T., Bogin, B., Katz, U., Deutch, D., & Berant, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.13007 · Cited by 38
Self-citationA Survey on Recent Approaches to Question Difficulty Estimation from Text
Benedetto, L., Cremonesi, P., Caines, A., Buttery, P. J., Cappelli, A., Giussani, A., & Turrin, R. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3556538 · Cited by 47
StepGame: A New Benchmark for Robust Multi-Hop Spatial Reasoning in Texts
Shi, Z., Zhang, Q., & Lipani, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21383 · Cited by 54
Roy, R. S., & Anand, A. (2021) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s0113ed1v01y202109icr076 · Cited by 37
Multi-step Entity-centric Information Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question Answering
Das, R., Godbole, A., Kavarthapu, D., Gong, Z., Singhal, A., Yu, M., Guo, X., Gao, T., Zamani, H., Zaheer, M., et al. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5816 · Cited by 41
Ren, H., Dai, H., Dai, B., Chen, X., Zhou, D., Leskovec, J., & Schuurmans, D. (2022) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539405 · Cited by 50
Yoran, O., Talmor, A., & Berant, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.416 · Cited by 40
Self-citationKhan, A. (2023) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/3615952.3615956 · Cited by 41
ComQA: A Community-sourced Dataset for Complex Factoid Question Answering with Paraphrase Clusters
Abujabal, A., Roy, R. S., Yahya, M., & Weikum, G. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1027 · Cited by 34
Encyclopedic VQA: Visual questions about detailed properties of fine-grained categories
Mensink, T., Uijlings, J., Castrejón, L., Goel, A., Cadar, F., Zhou, H., Sha, F., Araújo, A. D. M., & Ferrari, V. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00289 · Cited by 61
PullNet: Open Domain Question Answering with Iterative Retrieval on Knowledge Bases and TextPreprint
Sun, H., Bedrax-Weiss, T., & Cohen, W. W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09537 · Cited by 33
Dynamic Knowledge Graph Construction for Zero-shot Commonsense Question AnsweringPreprint
Bosselut, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 36
Mavi, V., Jangra, A., & Jatowt, A. (2024) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000102 · Cited by 119
Interactive Language Learning by Question Answering
Yuan, X., Côté, M.-A., Fu, J., Lin, Z., Pal, C., Bengio, Y., & Trischler, A. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1280 · Cited by 36
Jiang, J., Zhou, K., Zhao, X., Li, Y., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.228 · Cited by 47
Domain-agnostic Question-Answering with Adversarial Training
Lee, S., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5826 · Cited by 40
Improving complex knowledge base question answering via structural information learning
Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Hui, B., & Tian, L. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108252 · Cited by 31
Cui, H. N., Peng, T., Han, R., Zhu, B., Bi, H., & Liu, L. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103283 · Cited by 31
Liang, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, H., Wang, L., Qian, W., & Lan, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.263 · Cited by 46
ReaRev: Adaptive Reasoning for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
Mavromatis, C., & Karypis, G. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.181 · Cited by 43
An Ontology-Based Conversation System for Knowledge Bases
Quamar, A., Lei, C., Miller, D., Özcan, F., Kreulen, J. T., Moore, R. J., & Efthymiou, V. (2020) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3318464.3386139 · Cited by 29
A Hereditary Attentive Template-based Approach for Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering Systems
Gomes, J., de Mello, R. C., Ströele, V., & de Souza, J. F. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117725 · Cited by 31
On Making Reading Comprehension More Comprehensive
Gardner, M., Berant, J., Hajishirzi, H., Talmor, A., & Min, S. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5815 · Cited by 32
Self-citationThorne, J. P., Yazdani, M., Saeidi, M., Silvestri, F., Riedel, S., & Halevy, A. Y. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.241 · Cited by 36
Nie, L., Cao, S., Shi, J., Sun, J., Tian, Q. C., Hou, L., Li, J., & Zhai, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.394 · Cited by 29
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Li, Y., Zhang, R., & Liu, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72344-5_17 · Cited by 37
Transformers to Learn Hierarchical Contexts in Multiparty Dialogue for Span-based Question Answering
Li, C., & Choi, J. D. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.505 · Cited by 25
Graph Neural Networks for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Wu, L., Chen, Y., Shen, K., Guo, X., Gao, H., Li, S., Pei, J., & Long, B. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000096 · Cited by 417
VQuAnDa: Verbalization QUestion ANswering DAtaset
Kacupaj, E., Zafar, H., Lehmann, J., & Maleshkova, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_31 · Cited by 26
Metasql: A Generate-Then-Rank Framework for Natural Language to SQL Translation
Fan, Y., He, Z., Ren, T., Huang, C., Jing, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, X. S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00143 · Cited by 36
Parametric Retrieval Augmented Generation
Su, W., Tang, Y., Ai, Q., Yan, J., Wang, C., Wang, H., Ye, Z., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3729957 · Cited by 74
Answering Complex Questions by Combining Information from Curated and Extracted Knowledge Bases
Bhutani, N., Zheng, X., Qian, K., Li, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nli-1.1 · Cited by 25
FC-KBQA: A Fine-to-Coarse Composition Framework for Knowledge Base Question Answering
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Cao, S., Huang, X., Li, C., Chen, H., & Li, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.57 · Cited by 30
Advancements in Complex Knowledge Graph Question Answering: A Survey
Song, Y., Li, W., Dai, G., & Shang, X. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12214395 · Cited by 27
Reinforced Multi-task Approach for Multi-hop Question Generation
Gupta, D. K., Chauhan, H., Akella, R. T., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.249 · Cited by 25
Uniqorn: Unified question answering over RDF knowledge graphs and natural language text
Pramanik, S., Alabi, J. O., Roy, R. S., & Weikum, G. (2024) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2024.100833 · Cited by 45
Expanding End-to-End Question Answering on Differentiable Knowledge Graphs with Intersection
Sen, P., Oliya, A., & Saffari, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.694 · Cited by 24
Modeling Multi-hop Question Answering as Single Sequence Prediction
Yavuz, S., Hashimoto, K., Zhou, Y., Keskar, N. S., & Xiong, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.69 · Cited by 28
Is a Question Decomposition Unit All We Need?
Patel, P., Mishra, S. R., Parmar, M., & Baral, C. R. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.302 · Cited by 37
GS-CBR-KBQA: Graph-structured case-based reasoning for knowledge base question answering
Li, J., Luo, X., & Lu, G. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125090 · Cited by 26
RuBQ 2.0: An Innovated Russian Question Answering Dataset
Rybin, I., Korablinov, V., Efimov, P., & Braslavski, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77385-4_32 · Cited by 23
EDG-Based Question Decomposition for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Bases
Hu, X., Shu, Y., Huang, X. H., & Qu, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_8 · Cited by 24
A design space for RDF data representations
Sagi, T., Lissandrini, M., Pedersen, T. B., & Hose, K. (2022) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-021-00725-x · Cited by 22
COKG-QA: Multi-hop Question Answering over COVID-19 Knowledge Graphs
Du, H., Le, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Y., & Yu, J. (2022) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00154 · Cited by 22
ComQA: A Community-sourced Dataset for Complex Factoid Question Answering with Paraphrase ClustersPreprint
Abujabal, A., Roy, R. S., Yahya, M., & Weikum, G. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.09528 · Cited by 33
TwiRGCN: Temporally Weighted Graph Convolution for Question Answering over Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Gupta, C., Kazemi, M., Talukdar, P. P., & Chakrabarti, S. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.150 · Cited by 30
Unstructured Text Enhanced Open-Domain Dialogue System: A Systematic Survey
Ma, L., Li, M., Zhang, W., Li, J., & Liu, T. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3464377 · Cited by 24
Knowledge Fusion and Semantic Knowledge Ranking for Open Domain Question AnsweringPreprint
Banerjee, P., & Baral, C. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.03101 · Cited by 22
Multi-Step Reasoning Over Unstructured Text with Beam Dense Retrieval
Zhao, C., Xiong, C., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Daumé, H. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.368 · Cited by 25
A Brief Survey of Question Answering Systems
Caballero, M. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications · doi:10.5121/ijaia.2021.12501 · Cited by 21
Mention Memory: incorporating textual knowledge into Transformers through entity mention attentionPreprint
de Jong, M., Zemlyanskiy, Y., FitzGerald, N., Sha, F., & Cohen, W. W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06176 · Cited by 40
Decomposing Complex Questions Makes Multi-Hop QA Easier and More Interpretable
Fu, R., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Zhou, J., & Yan, Y. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.17 · Cited by 26
Wang, J., Li, W., Liu, F., Sheng, B., Liu, W., & Jin, Q. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110810 · Cited by 20
A template-based approach for question answering over knowledge bases
Formica, A., Mele, I., & Taglino, F. (2023) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-023-01966-8 · Cited by 22
ParaQA: A Question Answering Dataset with Paraphrase Responses for Single-Turn Conversation
Kacupaj, E., Banerjee, B., Singh, K., & Lehmann, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77385-4_36 · Cited by 19
A survey on complex factual question answering
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Ke, X., Li, H., Huang, X., Shao, Z., Cao, S., & Lv, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.12.003 · Cited by 24
From Easy to Hard: Two-Stage Selector and Reader for Multi-Hop Question Answering
Li, X., Lei, W.-J., & Yang, Y.-B. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096119 · Cited by 26
Multi-step Entity-centric Information Retrieval for Multi-Hop Question AnsweringPreprint
Godbole, A., Kavarthapu, D., Das, R., Gong, Z., Singhal, A., Zamani, H., Yu, M., Gao, T., Guo, X., Zaheer, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07598 · Cited by 23
Question Answering Over Knowledge Graphs: A Case Study in Tourism
Aghaei, S., Raad, E., & Fensel, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3187178 · Cited by 19
Collaborative Knowledge Graph Fusion by Exploiting the Open Corpus
Wang, Y., Wan, Y., Bai, L., Cui, L., Xu, Z., Li, M., Yu, P. S., & Hancock, E. R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3289949 · Cited by 19
Enhancing Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs through Evidence Pattern Retrieval
Ding, W., Li, J., Luo, L., & Qu, Y. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645563 · Cited by 18
NOAHQA: Numerical Reasoning with Interpretable Graph Question Answering Dataset
Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Yu, S., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Jiang, J., & Lim, E. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.350 · Cited by 21
A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation ModelsPreprint
Sun, J., Zheng, C., Xie, E., Liu, Z., Chu, R., Liu, J., Xu, J., Ding, M., Li, H., Geng, M., et al. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ac4sp · Cited by 143
QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Composition
Khot, T., Clark, P., Guerquin, M., Jansen, P., & Sabharwal, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6319 · Cited by 20
Compositional Generalization in Multilingual Semantic Parsing over Wikidata
Cui, R., Aralikatte, R., Lent, H., & Hershcovich, D. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00499 · Cited by 28
Unseen Entity Handling in Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base via Language Generation
Huang, X., Kim, J., & Zou, B. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.50 · Cited by 19
Knowledge Graph Question Answering Datasets and Their Generalizability
Jiang, L., & Usbeck, R. (2022) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3477495.3531751 · Cited by 17
Augmenting Pre-trained Language Models with QA-Memory for Open-Domain Question Answering
Chen, W., Verga, P., de Jong, M., Wieting, J., & Cohen, W. W. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.117 · Cited by 28
Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs
Nguyen, T., Luo, L., Shiri, F., Phung, D., Li, Y.-F., Vu, T.-T., & Haffari, G. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.168 · Cited by 17
Liu, B., Zhang, J., Lin, F., Yang, C., Peng, M., & Yin, W. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714768 · Cited by 16
A study of approaches to answering complex questions over knowledge bases
Gomes, J., de Mello, R. C., Ströele, V., & de Souza, J. F. (2022) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-022-01737-x · Cited by 16
Open-domain Question Answering via Chain of Reasoning over Heterogeneous Knowledge
Ma, K., Cheng, H., Liu, X., Nyberg, E., & Gao, J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.392 · Cited by 23
Zhang, G., Liu, J., Zhou, G., Zhao, K., Xie, Z., & Huang, B. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3375631 · Cited by 20
RuBQ: A Russian Dataset for Question Answering over Wikidata
Korablinov, V., & Braslavski, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_7 · Cited by 23
Exploring Decomposition for Table-based Fact Verification
Yang, X., & Zhu, X. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.90 · Cited by 17
Zhang, G., Liu, J., Zhou, G., Xie, Z., Yu, X., & Cui, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2022.3198272 · Cited by 16
Semantic Parsing for Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
Perez-Beltrachini, L., Jain, P., Monti, E., & Lapata, M. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.184 · Cited by 17
Wang, K., Duan, F., Wang, S., Li, P., Xian, Y., Yin, C., Rong, W., & Xiong, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.13259 · Cited by 16
Sun, S., Zhang, K., Li, J., Yu, M., Hou, K., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104147 · Cited by 20
A Retrieve-and-Read Framework for Knowledge Graph Link Prediction
Pahuja, V., Wang, B., Latapie, H. M., Srinivasa, J., & Su, Y. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3614769 · Cited by 20
Multi-Hop Open-Domain Question Answering over Structured and Unstructured Knowledge
Feng, Y., Han, Z. Y., Sun, M., & Li, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.12 · Cited by 15
Question Decomposition Tree for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Bases
Huang, X., Cheng, S., Shu, Y., Bao, Y., & Qu, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26519 · Cited by 23
A Survey of Large Language Models on Generative Graph Analytics: Query, Learning, and Applications
Shang, W., & Huang, X. S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3609877 · Cited by 33
Reasoning over Public and Private Data in Retrieval-Based Systems
Arora, S., Lewis, P., Fan, A., Kahn, J., & Ré, C. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00580 · Cited by 18
Zhong, W., Wang, S., Tang, D., Xu, Z., Guo, D., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Yin, J., Zhou, M., & Duan, N. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.177 · Cited by 18
QUEST: A Retrieval Dataset of Entity-Seeking Queries with Implicit Set Operations
Malaviya, C., Shaw, P., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.784 · Cited by 36
A Novel Joint Training Model for Knowledge Base Question Answering
Wang, S., & Qin, B. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3336526 · Cited by 14
Xu, S., Liu, S., Culhane, T., Pertseva, E., Wu, M.-H., Semnani, S. J., & Lam, M. S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.353 · Cited by 26
Leveraging Text-to-Text Pretrained Language Models for Question Answering in Chemistry
Tran, D. N., Pascazio, L., Akroyd, J., Mosbach, S., & Kraft, M. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c08842 · Cited by 13
Evidence Integration for Multi-Hop Reading Comprehension With Graph Neural Networks
Song, L., Wang, Z., Yu, M., Zhang, Y., Florian, R., & Gildea, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.2982894 · Cited by 128
Low-Resource Generation of Multi-hop Reasoning Questions
Yu, J., Liu, W., Qiu, S., Su, Q., Wang, K., Quan, X., & Yin, J. P. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.601 · Cited by 13
Alkhaldi, T., Chu, C., & Kurohashi, S. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3120643 · Cited by 13
Cao, X., Zhao, Y., & Shen, B. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07965-0 · Cited by 13
Visuo-Linguistic Question Answering (VLQA) Challenge
Sampat, S. K., Yang, Y., & Baral, C. R. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.413 · Cited by 16
Answering Complex Open-domain Questions Through Iterative Query GenerationPreprint
Qi, P., Lin, X., Mehr, L., Wang, Z., & Manning, C. D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.07000 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Talmor, A., & Berant, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers)
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 641-651
- OpenAlex
- W2793065281
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 19.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Samsung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- complex question answering, question answering, knowledge base construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
