Cited by 5Topic ModelingAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksNatural Language Processing Techniques

Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph

Open access
Zhao, Yao, Huang, Jiacheng, Hu, Wei, Chen, Qijin, Qiu, XiaoXia, Huo, Chengfu, Ren, Weijun·2022·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022

Abstract

Relation linking (RL) is a vital module in knowledge-based question answering (KBQA) systems.It aims to link the relations expressed in natural language (NL) to the corresponding ones in knowledge graph (KG).Existing methods mainly rely on the textual similarities between NL and KG to build relation links.Due to the ambiguity of NL and the incompleteness of KG, many relations in NL are implicitly expressed, and may not link to a single relation in KG, which challenges the current methods.In this paper, we propose an implicit RL method called ImRL, which links relation phrases in NL to relation paths in KG.To find proper relation paths, we propose a novel path ranking model that aligns not only textual information in the word embedding space but also structural information in the KG embedding space between relation phrases in NL and relation paths in KG.Besides, we leverage a gated mechanism with attention to inject prior knowledge from external paraphrase dictionaries to address the relation phrases with vague meaning.Our experiments on two benchmark and a newly-created datasets show that ImRL significantly outperforms several state-of-theart methods, especially for implicit RL.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

ImRL links relation phrases in natural language to relation paths in knowledge graphs by aligning word and KG embeddings and injecting paraphrase-dictionary knowledge via a gated attention mechanism. On LC-QuAD, QALD-9, and a new PathSQ dataset, it outperforms six state-of-the-art relation linking methods, especially for implicit relation linking.

Key findings

  • ImRL achieves the best reported results on all three datasets: LC-QuAD P 0.59 / R 0.49 / F1 0.54, QALD-9 P 0.51 / R 0.46 / F1 0.48, and PathSQ P 0.46 / R 0.41 / F1 0.43, outperforming methods including SimReL, SLING, Falcon, EARL, ReMatch, and SIBKB.
  • On QALD-9, for the 94% of questions with explicit single relations, ImRL reaches F1 0.48; for the remaining 6% with implicit relations, F1 reaches 0.47. On PathSQ, where all questions require implicit relation paths, ImRL dominates all three metrics.
  • Ablation on QALD-9 shows removing KG embeddings drops F1 by 0.04 (0.48 to 0.44), removing word embeddings drops it by 0.09 (0.48 to 0.39), and using string matching without embeddings gives F1 0.27. Knowledge injection with GATE gives F1 0.48, versus MEAN 0.47, CAT 0.46, and None 0.45.
  • Replacing the relation linking module in gAnswer with ImRL increases KBQA F1 by about 3.2% on LC-QuAD; SimReL reports 2.4% for comparison. On QALD-9, among 46 test questions with relations unseen in training, ImRL correctly predicts 10.

Methods

  • ImRL has two parts: path generation and path ranking. Path generation uses Falcon for entity linking, dependency-tree/BFS and AMR-based relation identification, and candidate generation over relation paths up to M=2 hops, selecting c=30 candidates by local-name cosine similarity.
  • Path ranking encodes relation paths with BERT/FFNN in a word embedding space and RotatE in a KG embedding space; it encodes the relation phrase with question context similarly, scores phrase-path pairs by dot product, and trains with MSE loss plus cross-entropy loss.
  • Knowledge injection uses the Paraphrase dictionary (2,284 relations and 31,130 paraphrase pairs) as Keys/Values, applies attention to select relevant paraphrases, and fuses them via a gated mechanism. Experiments use LC-QuAD 1.0 (5,000 questions, 1% implicit), QALD-9 (408 training, 150 test, 6% implicit), and PathSQ (400 two-hop implicit questions), with precision, recall, and F1.

Limitations

  • The paper states that paraphrase dictionaries have limitations: different dictionaries target different KGs and may need adjustment according to the KG schema. It also states error propagation in the pipeline can cause correct relation paths to be missing from the candidate set, lowering recall relative to precision; with gold candidates, F1 rises to 0.57.
  • The paper states that absence of entities greatly impacts ImRL: in a QALD-9 case with no entity, SimReL returns null and ImRL returns the wrong dbo:origin, and linking such a relation requires understanding the noun phrase, which all existing RL methods including ImRL cannot do.
  • Evident from the text: PathSQ only considers two-hop relation paths, and candidate generation uses maximum path length M=2, so longer paths are not evaluated; the paper also leaves combining entity linking and implicit RL for future work.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.312

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

24 of 37 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationnone given

    Unlike prior path ranking studies for KG completion that leverage entities and relations in the KG for path reasoning, our path ranking model additionally considers the relation phrase in the question for ranking.

    “Different from those studies using path ranking algorithm for KG completion (Lao et al., 2011;Gardner et al., 2014;Mazumder and Liu, 2017;Das et al., 2018), which leverage the entities and relations in the KG for path reasoning, our path ranking model additionally considers the relation phrase in the question for ranking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lao et al., 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gardner et al., 2014 source
    • cites Mazumder and Liu, 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    Existing relation linking methods mainly rely on textual similarities between natural language and knowledge graph to build relation links.

    “Existing methods mainly rely on the textual similarities between NL and KG to build relation links.”
    • Also stated in: § Question: · plain
      “Previous studies (Mulang et al., 2017;Singh et al., 2017;Naseem et al., 2021) focus on the similarities between the relation phrases and the text descriptions (e.g., local names) of relations in KG, and use the textual measures to link them.”
    • Also stated in: § 2 Related Work · plain
      “For the first task, ReMatch (Mulang et al., 2017), SIBKB (Singh et al., 2017) and EERL (Pan et al., 2019) generate candidates by running a textual similarity-based method over prebuilt dictionaries constructed by analyzing the NL patterns contained in massive text corpora through frequent item mining or crowdsourcing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mulang et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Singh et al., 2017 source
    • cites Naseem et al., 2021 source

      The Introduction says relation linking is addressed primarily using question text, and Related Work says most earlier methods rely on question text or its dependency parse. Neither passage establishes that these methods mainly rely on textual similarity between natural language and knowledge-graph labels; Related Work instead describes a range of rules and NLP tools. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Entity linking can affect relation linking (RL).

    “Recent studies (Singh et al., 2018) have shown that entity linking can affect RL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh et al., 2018 source

      The Motivating Example (Section 2; page unavailable) places named entity disambiguation before relation linking, and Section 3.1 describes both tasks as transformations of a question’s representation. This supports a possible connection, but the cited passages do not report that changing entity-linking results affects relation-linking performance. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The existing tool Falcon has shown accurate results on entity linking, around 0.83 F1-score on the LC-QuAD dataset as reported.

    “which has shown accurate results on entity linking (around 0.83 of F1-score on the LC-QuAD dataset as reported).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sakor et al., 2019 source

      The supplied passages and indexed search results contain only bibliographic metadata, with no results section or page addressing Falcon’s entity-linking performance. Searches for Falcon, LC-QuAD, and 0.83 F1-score found no passage that verifies the reported figure. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    RotatE has the properties of composition and symmetry of relations.

    “and have the properties of composition and symmetry of relations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sun et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims. 33
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Paraphrase dictionary maps natural language patterns to DBpedia relations and currently covers 2,284 relations and 31,130 paraphrase pairs.

    “Paraphrase maps NL patterns to DBpedia relations, which currently covers 2,284 relations and 31,130 paraphrase pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xue et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing relation linking methods perform well on several benchmark datasets but are still challenged by implicit relations prevalent in the real world.

    “However, according to (Sakor et al., 2019), while existing RL methods perform well on several benchmark datasets, they are still challenged by implicit relations prevalent in the real world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sakor et al., 2019 source

      The supplied passages are bibliographic metadata, with no section or page discussing relation-linking performance. Searches for benchmark performance and implicit relations returned no substantive full-text passage; the only topical text returned was an abstract, which cannot serve as evidence under the stated rubric. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Falcon and SLING perform poorly for other kinds of implicit relations and cannot handle relation linking through relation paths.

    “However, they perform poorly for other kinds of implicit relations, and cannot handle RL through relation paths either.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sakor et al., 2019 source

      The available indexed passages are bibliographic metadata (no section or page), not discussion of Falcon or SLING. Searches for implicit relations, poor performance, and relation paths found no passage addressing either claimed limitation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mihindukulasooriya et al., 2020 source

      The Qualitative Analysis (p. 10) supports a limitation in SLING: for a grandchildren question requiring two child relations, it did not decompose the question into two triples. But the Results (p. 9) say SLING identified a relation implicit in the question, and the cited passages do not establish that Falcon and SLING generally perform poorly on other implicit relations or cannot handle relation paths as a class. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    EERL discovers implicit relations by using domains and ranges of properties in the knowledge graph, but it cannot handle relation linking through relation paths.

    “For instance, EERL discovers the implicit relations by using the domains and ranges of properties in KG, but it cannot handle the issue of RL through relation paths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pan et al., 2019 source

      The available Abstract describes EERL as using entities extracted from questions and DBpedia entities to compute relation candidates. Searches for property domains and ranges, implicit relations, and relation paths found no passage addressing those specific claims. The available copy therefore does not establish either the proposed mechanism or the asserted limitation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    AMR can effectively capture semantic information at the sentence level.

    “according to (Mihindukulasooriya et al., 2020), AMR can effectively capture the semantic information at the sentence level”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mihindukulasooriya et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many relations in natural language are implicitly expressed and may not link to a single relation in the knowledge graph because of ambiguity in natural language and incompleteness of the knowledge graph.

    “Due to the ambiguity of NL and the incompleteness of KG, many relations in NL are implicitly expressed, and may not link to a single relation in KG, which challenges the current methods.”
    • Also stated in: § Question: · plain
      “However, according to (Sakor et al., 2019), while existing RL methods perform well on several benchmark datasets, they are still challenged by implicit relations prevalent in the real world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sakor et al., 2019 source

      The passages supplied from our copy contain bibliographic metadata, not the paper’s discussion. Searches for implicitly expressed relations, natural-language ambiguity, knowledge-graph incompleteness, and linking to a single relation returned no substantive passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous works pre-collect paraphrase pairs between relation phrases in natural language and KG relations through frequent item mining or crowdsourcing.

    “The previous works (Nakashole et al., 2012;Xue et al., 2020) pre-collect some paraphrase pairs (e.g.,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Nakashole et al., 2012
    • cites Xue et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The paraphrase dictionary constructed by Xue et al. (2020) establishes a mapping relationship between natural language phrases and relations in the knowledge graph, which can be prior knowledge for implicit relation phrases with vague meanings.

    “Considering the work (Xue et al., 2020) that constructs a dictionary of paraphrases and establishes a mapping relationship between NL phrases and relations in KG, which can be prior knowledge for implicit relation phrases with vague meanings”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xue et al., 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    93.8% of people in Freebase do not have place of birth, and 78.5% of people do not have nationality.

    “Besides, according to the statistics in (Stadelmaier and Padó, 2019), 93.8% of people in Freebase do not have place of birth, and 78.5% of people do not have nationality”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stadelmaier and Padó, 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LC-QuAD 1.0 contains 5,000 questions and corresponding SPARQL queries over DBpedia version 2016-04.

    “LC-QuAD 1.0 (Trivedi et al., 2017) is a large complex questions dataset for KBQA, which contains 5,000 questions and corresponding SPARQL queries over DBpedia (version 2016-04).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trivedi et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SimReL uses AMR for question representation and employs a Siamese network with BERT to link relations in an end-to-end manner.

    “SimReL (Naseem et al., 2021) also uses AMR for question representation, and employs a Siamese network with BERT to link relations in an end-to-end manner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naseem et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SimReL reports its F1-score improvement on LC-QuAD as 2.4%.

    “As a reference, SimReL reports its F1-score improvement on LC-QuAD as 2.4% (Naseem et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naseem et al., 2021 source

      The Results and Discussion section reports that incorporating AMR into relation linking improved the NSQA system’s F1 on the LC-QuAD 1.0 test set by 2.4, reaching 44.5. It does not describe this as a 2.4% relative improvement, and the reported gain is for the integrated KBQA system rather than SemReL’s standalone relation-linking F1. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SLING leverages AMR for preprocessing, trains a Transformer-based model based on distant supervision, and integrates several complementary signals for relation linking.

    “SLING (Mihindukulasooriya et al., 2020) leverages AMR for preprocessing, trains a Transformer-based model based on distant supervision, and integrates several complementary signals for RL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mihindukulasooriya et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Falcon enhances entity and relation linking through cross-KG entity and relation alignment and basic principles of English morphology.

    “Falcon (Sakor et al., 2019) enhances entity and relation linking through cross-KG entity and relation alignment and basic principles of English morphology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sakor et al., 2019 source

      The supplied passages are bibliographic metadata, and searches for cross-KG alignment, English morphology, and Falcon's method returned no passage from the paper's body. The indexed abstract addresses the claim, but the audit rules exclude abstracts as evidence, so the claimed mechanism cannot be verified from eligible passages. (LLM, conf=0.69)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    EARL models the linking problem as the generalized traveling salesman problem and uses connection density to link entities and relations jointly.

    “EARL (Dubey et al., 2018) models the linking problem as the generalized traveling salesman problem, and uses connection density to link entities and relations jointly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dubey et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In Figure 3, gAnswer's relation linking module incorrectly links the relation to dbo:birthPlace, leading to a wrong SPARQL query and wrong answer; ImRL correctly identifies dbo:birthDate, modifies the SPARQL query and returns the correct answer.

    “In Figure 3, the relation linking module of gAnswer incorrectly links the relation in the question to dbo:birthPlace, which leads to the wrong SPARQL query and the wrong answer.In contrast, ImRL can correctly identify the relation dbo:birthDate, modify the SPARQL query and return the correct answer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In the first PathSQ case, the relation phrase 'involved in' needs to be expressed using the relation path dbo:commander → dbo:militaryBranch according to the gold standard.

    “In the first case from PathSQ, the relation phrase”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Entity dbr:Rudi_Hedman does not have relation dbo:nationality in DBpedia, so the gold relation path dbo:nationality is missing in the candidate list.

    “However, since entity dbr:Rudi_Hedman does not have relation dbo:nationality in DBpedia, the gold relation path dbo:nationality is missing in the candidate list.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the second case, there is no entity in the QALD-9 question, which causes SimReL to be unable to enumerate any candidate relations since it depends on entity linking.

    “In the second case, there is no entity in this question of QALD-9”
    • Also stated in: § Ablation study of embedding models. · plain
      “causes that SimReL cannot enumerate any candidate relations since it depends on the result of entity linking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    ImRL correctly predicts 10 of the 46 QALD-9 testing questions with unseen relations.

    “Still, ImRL can correctly predict 10 of them”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    PathSQ is based on DBpedia version 2016-04.

    “It is based on DBpedia (version 2016-04)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In Figure 4, ImRL does not recognize the same relation dbo:foundedBy as the gold SPARQL query, but it recognizes dbp:founder, which is actually equivalent to dbo:foundedBy.

    “In Figure 4, although ImRL does not recognize the same relation dbo:foundedBy as the gold SPARQL query, it recognizes dbp:founder, which is actually equivalent to dbo:foundedBy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although ImRL's candidate generation is more robust, the absence of entities has a great impact on it, making it give the wrong answer dbo:origin.

    “Although the method of generating candidates of ImRL is more robust, the absence of entities also has a great impact on it, making it give the wrong answer dbo:origin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    With the increase of candidate path number c, MRR, Hits@c and F1-score all increase.

    “As shown in Table6, with the increase of c, MRR, Hits@c and F1-score all increase.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    ImRL achieves superior performance on LC-QuAD and QALD-9, where relations are mostly explicit, and PathSQ, where relations are all implicit.

    “The results show that our method achieves superior performance on LC-QuAD and QALD-9, where the relations are mostly explicit, and PathSQ, where the relations are all implicit”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    In the QALD-9 dataset, 94% of the questions contain explicit single relations.

    “Take QALD-9 for example, 94% of the questions are with explicit single relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    SimReL returns dbo:militaryBranch for the first case because it can only find the single relation whose meaning is most similar to the meaning of the whole question.

    “The state-of-the-art method SimReL returns dbo:militaryBranch, as it can only find the single relation whose meaning is most similar to the meaning of the whole question as the answer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Using rules to transform a dependency tree into a directed graph and using a heuristic search to find the shortest path between two nodes can effectively decompose a complex question into multiple simple triples, thereby discovering relations.

    “Inspired by (Hu et al., 2018), which demonstrates that using rules to transform the dependency tree into a directed graph and using a heuristic search to find the shortest path between two nodes can effectively decompose the complex question into multiple simple triples, thereby discovering the relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hu et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Values provide both textual and structural knowledge of natural language and KG.

    “Values provide both textual and structural knowledge of NL and KG.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Paraphrases can be considered as prior knowledge about the diverse meanings of natural language.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because knowledge graphs are incomplete, for some relation phrases it is not possible to find a corresponding single relation in the KG, and the phrase needs to be expressed by a relation path.

    “which makes it fail to find the corresponding single relations in KG for some phrases and needs to be expressed by relation paths.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Conventional relation linking can be regarded as a simpler case of the extended relation linking task when the relation path is one hop.

    “We extend the RL task to link phrases to relation paths, where conventional RL can be regarded as a simpler case when the path is one hop.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    QALD-9 provides 408 training questions and 150 test questions.

    “It provides 408 training questions and 150 test questions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Usbeck et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Keys provide textual knowledge from the perspective of natural language.

    “Keys provide textual knowledge from the perspective of NL”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Paraphrases can be considered as prior knowledge about the diverse meanings of natural language.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    6% of QALD-9 questions need implicit relation linking.

    “6% of which need implicit RL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Only 1% of LC-QuAD 1.0 questions involve implicit relation links.

    “Only 1% of the questions involve implicit relation links.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Existing benchmarks contain few implicit relations and cannot be used to evaluate implicit relation linking well.

    “Existing benchmarks contain few implicit relations and cannot be used to evaluate implicit RL well.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    All six state-of-the-art methods compared support relation linking over DBpedia.

    “We compare our ImRL with six state-of-the-art methods.All of them support RL over DBpedia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ImRL can capture similar relationships between dbo and dbp through the KG embedding module, showing that ImRL can leverage the structural information in the KG.

    “Thus, ImRL can capture similar relationships between dbo and dbp through the KG embedding module, which also shows that ImRL can leverage the structural information in the KG.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Due to DBpedia's organizational structure, namespaces dbo and dbp have different representations of the same relations.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rematch exploits WordNet and dependency parsing to model relation phrases with their underlying parts of speech, and uses various similarity metrics for ranking.

    “Rematch (Mulang et al., 2017) exploits Word-Net and dependency parsing to model relation phrases with their underlying parts of speech, and uses various similarity metrics for ranking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mulang et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Leveraging word embeddings and KG embeddings is common to both implicit and explicit relations.

    “The reason is that leveraging word embeddings and KG embeddings is common to both implicit and explicit relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    All questions in PathSQ need to be linked through implicit relation paths, which is challenging for existing methods.

    “This is because all the questions in PathSQ need to be linked through implicit relation paths, which is challenging for the existing methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ImRL can achieve reasoning of relation paths according to the composition property of KG embeddings, thereby effectively improving the accuracy of implicit RL.

    “By contrast, ImRL can achieve the reasoning of relation paths according to the composition property of KG embeddings, thereby effectively improving the accuracy of implicit RL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For explicit relations, because they usually contain a single relation, both R_Encoder and P_Encoder only need to encode one relation phrase or relation local name, which makes the matching of word embeddings easier.

    “For explicit relations, since they usually contain a single relation, both R_Encoder and P _Encoder only need to encode one relation phrase or relation local name, which makes the matching of word embeddings easier.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIBKB uses PATTY as the underlying knowledge source and establishes a bipartite graph index from common phrases in natural language to KG relations for relation linking.

    “SIBKB (Singh et al., 2017) uses PATTY as the underlying knowledge source, and establishes a bipartite graph index from common phrases in NL to KG relations for RL.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh et al., 2017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ImRL can not only deal with relation phrases that are not explicitly expressed in natural language, but also perform relation path reasoning in the knowledge graph.

    “demonstrating that ImRL can not only deal with relation phrases that are not explicitly expressed in NL, but also perform relation path reasoning in KG.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The better results of all injection methods verify the effectiveness of knowledge injection.

    “which verifies the effectiveness of knowledge injection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The knowledge in the dictionary may bring noises; combining part of the external knowledge and the original embeddings of the phrases can supplement more accurate external knowledge to enhance representations of implicit relation phrases.

    “This shows that the knowledge in the dictionary may also bring noises, thus by combining part of the external knowledge and the original embeddings of the phrases, more accurate external knowledge can be supplemented to enhance the representations of implicit relation phrases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The root cause of word embeddings being more important is that pre-trained language models (e.g., BERT) are trained on huge corpora with several downstream tasks, thus word embeddings can provide more prior knowledge.

    “We believe that the root cause to the phenomenon is that pre-trained language models, e.g., BERT, are trained on huge corpora with several downstream tasks, thus the word embeddings can provide more prior knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ImRL outperforms the latest method SimReL due to the use of KG embeddings and external knowledge of paraphrase dictionary as additional information.

    “due to the use of KG embeddings and external knowledge of paraphrase dictionary as additional information, ImRL outperforms the latest method SimReL without the two information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The KG embedding model used by ImRL (RotatE) is trained on a small-scale corpus, and its embeddings focus on limited structural information, leading to KG embeddings providing relatively less information than word embeddings.

    “While the KG embedding model used by ImRL, i.e., RotatE, is trained on a smallscale corpus, and the obtained embeddings more focus on limited structural information, which leads to that the KG embeddings provide relatively less information than the word embeddings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Path generation may cause correct relation paths to be missing in the candidate set, which causes the recall of ImRL to be lower than its precision.

    “since the path generation may cause correct relation paths missing in the candidate set, the recall of ImRL is lower than precision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Even if lots of additional information is considered, it is still difficult to pick the most correct relation path from a set of candidates, which reveals the challenge of the relation linking task.

    “Even if lots of additional information is considered, it is still difficult to pick the most correct one from a set of relation path candidates, which reveals the challenge of RL task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The structural information in knowledge graph embeddings can capture the correlation between single relations and relation paths.

    “ImRL can also use the structural information possessed by KG embeddings to capture the correlation between single relations and relation paths”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A gated mechanism with attention can effectively inject prior knowledge from external paraphrase dictionaries to provide auxiliary information for relation phrases with vague meanings.

    “which can provide auxiliary information for the relation phrases with vague meanings”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Relation paths in the knowledge graph can express missing relations through similar meaning.

    “expressing the missing relations through similar relation paths in the incomplete KG”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing RL methods only consider single relations when generating candidates.

    “Existing RL methods only consider single relations when generating candidates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most existing RL methods mainly focus on the local names of KG relations and leverage language models to capture the semantics, but they ignore the structural information in massive triples.

    “Most existing RL methods mainly focus on the local names of KG relations, and leverage language models to capture the semantics.However, they ignore the structural information in massive triples.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no prior work focusing on using KG embedding for implicit RL.

    “To the best of our knowledge, there is no prior work focusing on using KG embedding for implicit RL.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The relations in KG can provide rich information.

    “The relations in KG can provide rich information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In natural language questions, relation phrases need to be encoded into two spaces to capture different aspects of information.

    “in NL questions also need to be encoded into two spaces to capture different aspects of information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A relation phrase in a question creates a connection between entities.

    “In a question, a relation phrase s creates a connection between entities”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The KG embedding of a relation phrase should reflect the KG embedding of the relation path in the KG connecting the entities.

    “we expect the KG embedding s kg to reflect the KG embedding of the relation path in KG connecting these entities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a high correlation between relation linking and KBQA.

    “Due to the high correlation between RL and KBQA”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Paraphrases can be considered as prior knowledge about the diverse meanings of natural language.

    “These paraphrases can be considered as prior knowledge about the diverse meanings of NL.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Due to DBpedia's organizational structure, namespaces dbo and dbp have different representations of the same relations.

    “Due to the organizational structure of DBpedia, namespaces dbo and dbp have different representations of the same relations.”
13 of 13

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ricardo Usbeck, Ria Hari Gusmita, Axel- Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, and Muhammad Saleem. 2018. 9th challenge on question answering over linked data (QALD-9) (invited paper). In Semdeep/NLIWoD@ISWC, pages 58-64.
  2. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In NIPS, pages 5998-6008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Huang, J., Hu, W., Chen, Q., Qiu, X., Huo, C., & Ren, W.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022
Published
2022
Pages
3956-3968
OpenAlex
W4285254449
Cited by
5
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872172)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
knowledge base question answering, knowledge graphs, path ranking, word embeddings, knowledge graph embedding, gated attention mechanism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review