Cited by 183Speech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Personalizing Dialogue Agents via Meta-Learning

Open access
Madotto, Andrea, Lin, Zhaojiang, Wu, Chien-Sheng, Fung, Pascale·2019·Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Existing personalized dialogue models use human designed persona descriptions to improve dialogue consistency.Collecting such descriptions from existing dialogues is expensive and requires hand-crafted feature designs.In this paper, we propose to extend Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) (Finn et al., 2017) to personalized dialogue learning without using any persona descriptions.Our model learns to quickly adapt to new personas by leveraging only a few dialogue samples collected from the same user, which is fundamentally different from conditioning the response on the persona descriptions.Empirical results on Persona-chat dataset (Zhang et al., 2018) indicate that our solution outperforms non-metalearning baselines using automatic evaluation metrics, and in terms of human-evaluated fluency and consistency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p19-1542

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez, Matthew W Hoffman, David Pfau, Tom Schaul, Brendan Shillingford, and Nando De Freitas. 2016. Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient de- scent. In Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, pages 3981-3989.
  2. Samy Bengio, Yoshua Bengio, Jocelyn Cloutier, and Jan Gecsei. 1992. On the optimization of a synaptic learning rule. In Preprints Conf. Optimality in Ar- tificial and Biological Neural Networks, pages 6-8. Univ. of Texas.
  3. Qian Chen, Xiaodan Zhu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Si Wei, Hui Jiang, and Diana Inkpen. 2017. Enhanced lstm for natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1657-1668. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. · DOI
  4. Emily Dinan, Varvara Logacheva, Valentin Malykh, Alexander Miller, Kurt Shuster, Jack Urbanek, Douwe Kiela, Arthur Szlam, Iulian Serban, Ryan Lowe, et al. 2019. The second conversational intelligence challenge (convai2). arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00098. · arXiv
  5. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70, pages 1126-1135. JMLR. org.
  6. Jianfeng Gao, Michel Galley, and Lihong Li. 2018. Neural approaches to conversational ai. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Re- search & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1371-1374. ACM.
  7. Jiatao Gu, Yong Wang, Yun Chen, Victor O. K. Li, and Kyunghyun Cho. 2018. Meta-learning for low- resource neural machine translation. In Proceed- ings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3622-3631. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Po-Sen Huang, Chenglong Wang, Rishabh Singh, Wen-tau Yih, and Xiaodong He. 2018. Natural language to structured query generation via meta- learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), pages 732-738. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  9. Chaitanya K Joshi, Fei Mi, and Boi Faltings. 2017. Personalization in goal-oriented dialog. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07503. · arXiv
  10. Ilya Kulikov, Alexander H Miller, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jason Weston. 2018. Importance of a search strategy in neural dialogue modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00907. · arXiv
  11. Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Georgios Sp- ithourakis, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2016. A persona-based neural conversation model. In Pro- ceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), volume 1, pages 994-1003.
  12. Zhaojiang Lin, Genta Indra Winata, and Pascale Fung. 2019. Learning comment generation by leveraging user-generated data. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 7225-7229. IEEE.
  13. Chia-Wei Liu, Ryan Lowe, Iulian Serban, Mike Nose- worthy, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. How not to evaluate your dialogue system: An em- pirical study of unsupervised evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2122-2132. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  14. Andrea Madotto, Chien-Sheng Wu, and Pascale Fung. 2018. Mem2seq: Effectively incorporating knowl- edge bases into end-to-end task-oriented dialog sys- tems. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol- ume 1: Long Papers), pages 1468-1478.
  15. Pierre-Emmanuel Mazare, Samuel Humeau, Martin Raison, and Antoine Bordes. 2018. Training mil- lions of personalized dialogue agents. In Proceed- ings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2775-2779. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. Nikhil Mishra, Mostafa Rohaninejad, Xi Chen, and Pieter Abbeel. 2017. A simple neural attentive meta- learner. ICLR.
  17. Devang K Naik and RJ Mammone. 1992. Meta- neural networks that learn by learning. In [Proceed- ings 1992] IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, volume 1, pages 437-442. IEEE.
  18. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 confer- ence on empirical methods in natural language pro- cessing (EMNLP), pages 1532-1543.
  19. Revanth Reddy, Danish Contractor, Dinesh Raghu, and Sachindra Joshi. 2018. Multi-level memory for task oriented dialogs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.10647. · arXiv
  20. Adam Santoro, Sergey Bartunov, Matthew Botvinick, Daan Wierstra, and Timothy Lillicrap. 2016. Meta- learning with memory-augmented neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1842-1850.
  21. Jurgen Schmidhuber. 1987. Evolutionary principles in self-referential learning. on learning now to learn: The meta-meta-meta...-hook. Diploma thesis, Tech- nische Universitat Munchen, Germany, 14 May.
  22. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Gar- nett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 30, pages 5998-6008.
  23. Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. In Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, pages 3630-3638.
  24. Chien-Sheng Wu, Andrea Madotto, Genta Winata, and Pascale Fung. 2017. End-to-end recurrent entity net- work for entity-value independent goal-oriented di- alog learning. In Dialog System Technology Chal- lenges Workshop, DSTC6.
  25. Chien-Sheng Wu, Andrea Madotto, Genta Indra Winata, and Pascale Fung. 2018. End-to-end dy- namic query memory network for entity-value inde- pendent task-oriented dialog. In 2018 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 6154-6158. IEEE.
  26. Chien-Sheng Wu, Richard Socher, and Caiming Xiong. 2019. Global-to-local memory pointer networks for task-oriented dialogue. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  27. Mo Yu, Xiaoxiao Guo, Jinfeng Yi, Shiyu Chang, Saloni Potdar, Yu Cheng, Gerald Tesauro, Haoyu Wang, and Bowen Zhou. 2018. Diverse few-shot text clas- sification with multiple metrics. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Pa- pers), pages 1206-1215. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI
  28. Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018. Per- sonalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too? In Proceedings of the 56th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2204- 2213. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madotto, A., Lin, Z., Wu, C.-S., & Fung, P.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2019
Pages
5454-5459
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945978556
Cited by
183
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 5
FWCI
10.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
meta-learning, model-agnostic meta-learning, few-shot adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review