Cited by 47Speech Recognition and SynthesisVoice and Speech DisordersSpeech and Audio Processing

Model adaptation and adaptive training for the recognition of dysarthric speech

Open access
Sehgal, Siddharth, Cunningham, Stuart·2015·Proceedings of SLPAT 2015: 6th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies

Abstract

Dysarthria is a neurological speech disorder, which exhibits multi-fold disturbances in the speech production system of an individual and can have a detrimental effect on the speech output.In addition to the data sparseness problems, dysarthric speech is characterised by inconsistencies in the acoustic space making it extremely challenging to model.This paper investigates a variety of baseline speaker independent (SI) systems and its suitability for adaptation.The study also explores the usefulness of speaker adaptive training (SAT) for implicitly annihilating inter-speaker variations in a dysarthric corpus.The paper implements a hybrid MLLR-MAP based approach to adapt the SI and SAT systems.ALL the results reported uses UA-SPEECH dysarthric data.Our best adapted systems gave a significant absolute gain of 11.05% (20.42% relative) over the last published best result in the literature.A statistical analysis performed across various systems and its specific implementation in modelling different dysarthric severity sub-groups, showed that, SAT-adapted systems were more applicable to handle disfluencies of more severe speech and SI systems prepared from typical speech were more apt for modelling speech with low level of severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w15-5112

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. Kent, J. Kent, G. Weismer, and J. Duffy, "What dysarthria can tell us about the neural control of speech," Journal of Phonetics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 273-302, 2000.
  2. M. Spyros, S. Rich, J. Hubert, and N. Long, "Practical implemen- tations of speaker-adaptive training," in DARPA Speech Recogni- tion Workshop, 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sehgal, S., & Cunningham, S.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of SLPAT 2015: 6th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies
Published
2015
Pages
65-71
ISSN
2411-9962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2250686550
Cited by
47
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (II-LB-0214-20008)
  • Invention for Innovation Programme
  • Invention for Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
dysarthria, dysarthric speech recognition, speaker adaptive training, model adaptation, maximum likelihood linear regression, maps, speaker variability, dysarthria severity, disfluency, data sparsity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review