Cited by 54Natural Language Processing TechniquesTopic ModelingSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Machine Translation of Logographic Language Using Sub-character Level Information

Open access
Zhang, Longtu, Komachi, Mamoru·2018·Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers

Abstract

Recent neural machine translation (NMT) systems have been greatly improved by encoder-decoder models with attention mechanisms and sub-word units.However, important differences between languages with logographic and alphabetic writing systems have long been overlooked.This study focuses on these differences and uses a simple approach to improve the performance of NMT systems utilizing decomposed sub-character level information for logographic languages.Our results indicate that our approach not only improves the translation capabilities of NMT systems between Chinese and English, but also further improves NMT systems between Chinese and Japanese, because it utilizes the shared information brought by similar sub-character units.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w18-6303

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735-1780.
  2. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In ACL 2016, pages 1715-1725.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., & Komachi, M.
Affiliations
Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers
Published
2018
Pages
17-25
OpenAlex
W2963223057
Cited by
53
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K16117)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
neural machine translation, logographic languages, character decomposition, Chinese-English translation, Chinese-Japanese translation, subword units

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review