The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prioridad de Valores y Comportamiento: La Aplicación de una Propuesta Teórica acerca de un Sistema Integrado de Valores
Open accessAbstract
A major goal of research on values has been to relate individual differences in value priorities to differences in attitudes, behavior and background variables. Past research most commonly adopted one of two approaches. Much research has selected a few single target values whose priorities were postulated to associate with the attitude, behavior and background variable of interest and then examined empirical relationships. Other research has been more exploratory.It has related lists of values to various other variables and then discussed the significant associations that emerge. The focus on relationships with single values make both these approaches insatisfying. My work has sought to overcome those approaches.It has derived what may be a nearly comprehensive set of different motivational types of values, recognized across cultures. Each value type is represented by a number of single values that are combined to form relatively reliable indexes of values priorities. Value systems can be treated as integrated wholes in their relations with behaviors and, thereby, encourages researches to abandom the prevailing single-values approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Self-citationGuttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437 · Cited by 514
Self-citation
Cited by
An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values
Schwartz, S. H. (2012) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116 · Cited by 4,147
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 3,054
A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
Duckitt, J. (2001) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80004-6 · Cited by 1,416
Materialism and Well-Being: A Conflicting Values Perspective
Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/344429 · Cited by 1,313
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, S.
- Venue
- Psicodebate
- Publisher
- Fundacion Universidad de Palermo
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 119
- ISSN
- 2451-6600
- 1515-2251
- OpenAlex
- W2215997554
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prioridad de Valores y Comportamiento: La Aplicación de una Propuesta Teórica acerca de un Sistema Integrado de Valores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18682/pd.v2i0.514
- The paper
- Schwartz, S. (2002). Prioridad de Valores y Comportamiento: La Aplicación de una Propuesta Teórica acerca de un Sistema Integrado de Valores. Psicodebate. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v2i0.514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.