Cited by 7Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationTeacher Education and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voices from the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ interactions with supervising teachers

Open access
Moosa, Dr Moeniera, Rembach, Ms Lauren·2018·Perspectives in Education

Abstract

Teaching practice is an important requirement to acquire a teaching qualification from South African universities. During teaching practice, it is customary for supervising teachers to guide and evaluate the students’ performance. However, very little is known about how the interaction with supervising teachers influences the students’ views about the teaching profession. Forty final-year Bachelor of Education students at the University of the Witwatersrand gave their consent to participate in a qualitative study using open-ended questionnaires. This research aimed to explore pre-service teachers’ voices, using Denise Batchelor’s (2008; 2006) research pertaining to conceptualisations of voice, namely, practical, epistemological and ontological, which were used to analyse the data. The findings suggested that pre-service teachers’ pedagogical choices were linked to the supervising teachers’ guidance. Many of the supervising teachers framed teaching as a profession that foregrounded administrative tasks and classroom management. Some of the supervising teachers’ negative perceptions of the profession caused pre-service teachers to question their choice to become teachers. Another issue was that pre-service teachers wish to feel welcomed and supported at schools, but most experienced a lack of mentorship from their supervising teachers. We recommend that supervising teachers attend workshops and courses on how to mentor pre service teachers

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18820/2519593x/pie.v36i1.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings concur with prior studies that constructive feedback is not always provided.

    “however, the findings seem to concur with Hugo (2018), Baartman (2016) and Moosa and Rembach (2018) that constructive feedback is not always provided, as shown by the large percentage of mentees who indicated that they did not receive any feedback.”

    From Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) Students’ Experience of Mentoring (2022) · cites this paper as Moosa and Rembach, 2018

  • Mentors' examples might inculcate certain trends and beliefs in their mentees, even beliefs that might negatively influence the mentee's self-efficacy.

    “The results thus imply that mentors should not underestimate the value of how they teach, i.e., their modelling, as their examples might inculcate certain trends and beliefs in their mentees (see Du Plessis, 2013;Baartman, 2016;Moosa and Rembach, 2018), even beliefs that might negatively influence the mentee's self-efficacy.”

    From Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) Students’ Experience of Mentoring (2022) · cites this paper as Moosa and Rembach, 2018

  • Our findings suggest that mentees' desire to grow across the seven levels was not the case, which concurs with the findings of Baartman (2016) and Moosa and Rembach (2018) that this is something to be addressed in the South African context.

    “however, our findings suggest that this was not the case, which concurs with the findings of Baartman (2016) and Moosa and Rembach (2018) that this is something to be addressed in the South African context.”

    From Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) Students’ Experience of Mentoring (2022) · cites this paper as Moosa and Rembach (2018)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moosa, D. M., & Rembach, M. L.
Venue
Perspectives in Education
Published
2018
Volume
36
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
  • 2519-593X
OpenAlex
W2898022760
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
pre-service teachers, cooperating teachers, teaching practice, teacher professional development, mentoring, teacher identity, classroom management, student voice, Bachelor of Education students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review