The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving students graphing skills and conceptual understanding using explicit Graphical Physics Instructions
Open accessAbstract
The study presented investigates the effects of supportive graphical interventions on the graphing skills and conceptual understanding of students in physics. In this study, the first group of participants was presented with ready-made graphs during the instruction, the second group was instructed on the proper construction and extraction of graphs, while the third group was instructed to construct graphs independently. The groups were compared with respect to their scores in the graphing skills and achievement tests before and after the instructions. The group that received supportive intervention in construction and extraction of graphs attained the highest number of high-level graphs constructed and obtained the highest increase in the achievement test scores after the instruction. The results revealed that the use of the supportive graphical intervention in the construction and extraction of graphs improved the graphing skills and conceptual understanding of students, especially for those who experienced difficulties in dealing graphs. Keywords: Graphical interventions, construction of graph, interpretation of graph, graphing skills, conceptual understanding;
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the ongoing improvements after intervention removal suggest these methods not only provide temporary assistance but also contribute to the learning of vital visualisation comprehension skills, extending their educational benefits (Asamoah, 2022; Bahtaji, 2020).”
From The effects of generative AI agents and scaffolding on enhancing students’ comprehension of visual learning analytics (2025) · cites this paper as Bahtaji, 2020
Citations
Cites
Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00017-8 · Cited by 941
Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature
Glazer, N. (2011) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.605307 · Cited by 285
Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation
Stern, E., Aprea, C., & Ebner, H. G. (2003) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00020-8 · Cited by 145
Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields
Bollen, L., van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & Cock, M. D. (2017) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.13.020109 · Cited by 104
Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them?
Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017) · Models and modeling in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1 · Cited by 95
Instructional Strategies to Develop Graphing Skills in the College Science Classroom
Harsh, J. A., & Schmitt-Harsh, M. (2016) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2016.78.1.49 · Cited by 53
Undergraduate student construction and interpretation of graphs in physics lab activities
Nixon, R. S., Godfrey, T. J., Mayhew, N., & Wiegert, C. C. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.010104 · Cited by 51
Toward a standard assembly of linear graphs.
Dart, E. H., & Radley, K. C. (2018) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/spq0000269 · Cited by 43
Slutsky, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Wrist Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1375704 · Cited by 43
The Importance of Diagrams, Graphics and Other Visual Representations in STEM Teaching
Gates, P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_9 · Cited by 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yan, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Jin, Y., Echeverria, V., Milesi, M., Fan, J., Zhao, L., Alfredo, R., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105322 · Cited by 85
A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Graphing Numerical Data in K–12 STEM Education
Ruf, V., Thüs, D., Malone, S., Küchemann, S., Becker, S., Vogel, M., Brünken, R., & Kühn, J. (2026) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-026-10653-3 · Cited by 11
Koswojo, J., Kusairi, S., Sutopo, S., & Supriana, E. (2024) · Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA · doi:10.23960/jpmipa/v25i4.pp1906-1924 · Cited by 5
Ogbonnaya, I. C., & Ngulube, B. (2024) · Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.59915/jes.2024.23.4.3 · Cited by 2
Calingacion, J. P., Dacera, A. L. M., Castro, M. G., Lubay, J. C., Bug-os, R. F. F. C., & Bansale, J. C. (2025) · Indonesian Journal of Education and Pedagogy. · doi:10.61251/ijoep.v2i1.123 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahtaji, M. A. A.
- Affiliations
- Technological University of the Philippines (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Bahtaji, Michael Allan A.
- Venue
- Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences
- Published
- 2020-08-31
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 843-853
- ISSN
- 1305-905X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081627494
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- graphing skills, graph construction, graph interpretation, conceptual understanding, physics education, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
