Cited by 36Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth disparities and outcomesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Practice-Based Research Networks: Strategic Opportunities to Advance Implementation Research for Health Equity

Open access
Westfall, John M., Roper, Rebecca, Gaglioti, Anne, Nease, Jr., Donald E.·2019·Ethnicity & Disease

Abstract

While the vast majority of people re­ceive their medical care in community primary and specialty care clinics, most clinical research is performed in academic tertiary care hospitals and hospital clin­ics. Practice-based research networks are most commonly collections of primary care practices that work together to ask and answer health questions for their patients and communities and are an integral part of the translational pathway from discovery to practice to community health. Community primary care practices are at the front line of health equity issues; equity in clinical care, equity in community health, equity in social determinants of health, and equity in health outcomes. Practice-based research networks can gather and combine data from dozens of communities, hundreds of prac­tices and thousands of patients to address health equity and disparities across the full spectrum of community and public health to clinical and primary care. This article will briefly outline the history of PBRNs, types of PBRNs, locations, topics, and patient outcomes over the past 25 years. Current PBRN efforts to address health disparities and improve health equity will be described. New PBRN opportunities to address health disparities and approaches to advance implementation research for health equity in the practice and community will be described. Readers will be challenged to consider ways to engage practice-based research networks in their health equity ef­forts.Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Suppl 1):113-118; doi:10.18865/ed.29.S1.113.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18865/ed.29.s1.113

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westfall, J. M., Roper, R., Gaglioti, A., & Nease, Jr.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
Venue
Ethnicity & Disease
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
29
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
113-118
ISSN
  • 1049-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0826
OpenAlex
W2916590334
Cited by
36
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnicity & Disease (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R25MD007589)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
practice-based research networks, health equity, implementation research, health disparities, primary care, social determinants of health, community health, translational research, community-engaged research
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Implementation Science, Community Health Services, Humans, Primary Health Care, Public Health, Research, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review