An approach to improving student success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career pathways
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we report on an 11-year study that explores approaches to improve student success in college by a five-week summer program in Mathematics and Language Arts for entering freshmen. To recruit students into the program, we invited students accepted at the university and listed as underrepresented and economically disadvantaged (Pell-eligible) by the Office of Institutional Research at California State University, Northridge. The program consisted of all-day Math and English enhancement in mixed ability groups. Results of this program examining Math and English performance at California State University, Northridge showed that students completing the summer programs during the 11-year study period had improved pass rates in Math and English at California State University, Northridge compared with students in a control group who did not participate in the summer program. The results show that intensive pre-college enhancement for entering freshmen can improve student success in college. Student graduation data from the early cohorts (2010, 2011, 2012) were obtained from Institutional Research. The summary results showed that students from the accepted/ attending group had substantially increased GPAs and graduation rates, essentially closing the achievement gap. Increased interest in biomedical research careers was also developed by the program, as demonstrated by a five-fold number of summer enrichment participants entering the PhD, MARC (Minority Access to Research Careers) and RISE (Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement) programs than students who did not attend summer enrichment. Ethn Dis.2020;30(1):33-40; doi:10.18865/ed.30.1.33
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oppenheimer et al. (2020) considered two control groups: students accepted but did not attend, and students who applied but were not selected.
“Oppenheimer et al. (2020) considered two groups as controls to compare to the treatment; one was students who were accepted into the program but did not attend, and the second was the group of students who applied but were not selected.”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Oppenheimer et al. (2020)
Three studies considered 10 or more cohorts (Murphy et al., 2010; Oppenheimer et al., 2020; Walter & Wade, 2024).
“Notably, one study considered 6 cohorts of students (Evans, 2014) and three studies considered 10 or more cohorts (Murphy et al., 2010;Oppenheimer et al., 2020;Walter & Wade, 2024).”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Oppenheimer et al., 2020
Cites
Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.
Altman, D. G. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012702 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Oppenheimer, S. B., Mills, J. I., Zakeri, A., Payte, T. R., Lidgi, A., & Zavala, M.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- Venue
- Ethnicity & Disease
- Publisher
- Ethnicity and Disease Inc
- Published
- 2020-01-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-40
- ISSN
- 1049-510X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0826
- PMC
- PMC6970529
- OpenAlex
- W2998934333
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Ethnicity & Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T34GM008395, R25GM063787)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- summer enrichment programs, STEM career pathways, underrepresented students, low-income students, college success, mathematics achievement, English achievement, achievement gap, graduation rates, GPA, biomedical research careers, California State University, Northridge
- MeSH terms
- Career Choice, Humans, Mathematics, Minority Groups, Students, Technology, Universities, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review