The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Buddhist Debate and the Production and Transmission of Shogyo in Medieval Japan
Open accessAbstract
Medieval scholar-monks produced and transmitted a massive body of texts known as sacred works or shogyo. This article focuses on the Todaiji monk Sosho (1202-1278), who produced almost five hundred texts. How and for what purposes did a scholar-monk come to generate such a massive body of texts? First, Sosho produced most of his texts in the process of preparing for and participating in state-sponsored debate rituals (rongie). Since scholarmonks' participation in these rituals guaranteed their promotion, they produced their shogyo first and foremost for advancing their positions in the ecclesiastical community. In addition, copying shogyo was the main method of learning and advancing doctrinal studies. The transmission of shogyo also contributed to a significant institutional change in temple society in medieval Japan-the development of cloisters (inge). This article reveals the undeniable importance of liturgical tradition and the resultant production of shogyo in medieval Japan.KEYWORDS: Buddhist debate (rongi)-scholar-monks (gakusho)-Sosho-Todaiji- shogyo-cloisters (inge)(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)In medieval Japan (roughly from the twelfth to the early-sixteenth century), scholar-monks (gakuryo ... or gakusho ...) produced and transmitted various texts (shogyo ...)1 as part of their efforts to establish the authenticity of their doctrinal knowledge, ritual techniques, and cloisters (inge...).2 In this article, I analyze this process by examining texts that the Todaiji ... monk Sosho ... (1202-1278) produced to prepare for participating in Buddhist debate rituals (rongie ...) sponsored by the state.3 Unlike one-time polemical debate, these state-sponsored debate rituals were held annually and provided an elite scholar-monk such as Sosho with opportunities to gain knowledge of Buddhist doctrines and to build his credentials as a scholar. A monk's successful debate performance in state-organized debate rituals not only increased his fame, but also guaranteed his promotion to a high position in the ecclesiastical office of sogo .... In order to prepare for debate, Sosho copied, edited, or compiled vast amounts of shogyo, and he later transmitted these texts to his disciples who also were to attend debate rituals. Furthermore, the transmission of shogyo contributed not only to the education of his disciples but also to his lifelong ambition of reinvigorating Kegon ... studies at his cloister within Todaiji.Despite the voluminous corps of texts that he leftand the significance of his pedagogical and scholarly achievements, Sosho has not attracted major scholarly interest, especially in the English-speaking world, for several reasons. First, there are certain technical difficulties; most of Sosho's shogyo texts have not been published, and still remain in the form of handwritten manu- scripts. In addition, Sosho usually copied these texts very quickly; therefore, he used a rather peculiar shorthand style, which is not easily decipherable to the untrained eye.4 Finally, Sosho was more interested in copying, editing, and commenting on what others had written than authoring his own work. A Todaiji monk once half-jokingly said to me that Sosho was a mere copyist (kopi man). This view, however, is premised on the modern notion of authorship, which is not always applicable to premodern texts.5 In this article, I show that the act of copying, and its products-the texts themselves-facilitated a scholar-monk's desire for academic accomplishment, salvific attainment, and political empowerment.In addition, scholarly paradigms in the field of premodern Japanese religions that are currently dominant tend to neglect or obscure the intellectual and social activities of elite scholar-monks of Nanto6 temples such as Sosho-especially Kuroda Toshio's characterization of and Buddhism (kenmitsu ...). Kuroda largely equates exoteric with doctrinal learning-what elite scholar-monks of Nanto temples devoted their life to-while contrasting it with esoteric Buddhism that focused on thaumaturgical rites (shuho . …
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participation in debate ritual simultaneously allowed S ō sh ō to advance in his understanding of Buddhist doctrine and to secure monastic promotions.”
From Buddhist Manuscript Cultures in Premodern Japan (2014) · cites this paper as Asuka Sango (2012)
In the citing paper
“Asuka Sango (2012) has highlighted the writings of S ō sh ō , who produced nearly 500 texts, mostly in the context of debate ritual.”
From Buddhist Manuscript Cultures in Premodern Japan (2014) · cites this paper as Asuka Sango (2012)
In the citing paper
“Sango ' s study also demonstrates that participation in debate ritual required deep familiarity with Buddhist philosophical texts and broad learning that transcended facile sectarian distinctions.”
From Buddhist Manuscript Cultures in Premodern Japan (2014) · cites this paper as Sango (2012)
In the citing paper
“As Sango (2012, 269) notes, ' A debate ritual provided a space for elite scholar-monks of different schools to engage in dialogue across sectarian lines. '”
From Buddhist Manuscript Cultures in Premodern Japan (2014) · cites this paper as Sango (2012, 269)
Citations
Cites
Making Debate Hell: Knowledge and Power in Japanese Buddhist Ritual
Sango, A. (2011) · History of Religions · doi:10.1086/656615 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buddhist Manuscript Cultures in Premodern Japan
Lowe, B. D. (2014) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/rec3.12132 · Cited by 12
Apocryphal Chinese books in the Buddhist canon at Matsuo Shintō shrine
Keyworth, G. A. (2016) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2016.1235662 · Cited by 6
Buddhist Debate in Medieval Japan
Sango, A. (2015) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/rec3.12156 · Cited by 3
Self-citationKeyworth, G. A. (2019) · Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies · doi:10.15239/hijbs.02.01.04 · Cited by 2
Keyworth, G. A. (2019) · Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies · doi:10.15239/hijbs.01.02.03
Metadata
- Authors
- Sango, A.
- Corresponding author
- Sango, Asuka
- Venue
- Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
- Publisher
- Nanzan University
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- ISSN
- 0304-1042 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W332856612
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Japanese Journal of Religious Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Buddhist debate, Tōdai-ji, cloister, textual transmission, medieval Japanese Buddhism, Sogo, liturgical tradition, 13th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buddhist Debate and the Production and Transmission of Shogyo in Medieval Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18874/jjrs.39.2.2012.241-273
- The paper
- Sango, A. (2012). Buddhist Debate and the Production and Transmission of Shogyo in Medieval Japan. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.39.2.2012.241-273