Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FIRE AND VEGETATION HISTORY IN THE EASTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTON

Wright, Clinton S., Agee, James K.·2004·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Dendrochronological techniques were used to reconstruct a 433‐yr fire history, and to characterize the historical fire regime (frequency, size, season, severity) of the Teanaway River drainage in the eastern Cascade Mountains of Washington, USA. General Land Office section corner data were used to reconstruct aspects of the late‐19th‐century structure and composition of the forests in the study area. Systematic fire‐scar surveys (∼30 000 ha; 92 sites; 257 fire‐scarred cross‐sections; 1569 individual fire scars) revealed that fire frequency was quite variable spatially; Weibull median probability intervals ranged from seven to 43 years. Fire extent also varied widely; most fires were relatively small (<1000 ha), although several large fires (>4000 ha) were detected. Mean and median fire sizes were 1795 ha and 988 ha, respectively. Large fires occurred every 27 years, on average (every 11 years, on average, between 1708 and 1889), and coincided with periods of annual and seasonal drought (Palmer Drought Severity Index and winter Southern Oscillation Index). Intervals from 1 to 37 years occurred between fires of >4000 ha. Over 80% of fires occurred late in the growing season, or after the onset of cambial dormancy. Sampling locations in dry forest types (dominated by ponderosa pine) yielded fire‐scarred cross‐sections with numerous fire scars leading us to infer that most historical fires were of low intensity, leaving the overstory structure intact. This inference is corroborated by the composition and structure of the historical forest, which was characterized by a preponderance of very large (>100‐cm diameter) ponderosa pines. Mesic forest types (dominated by grand fir and Douglas‐fir) likely exhibited a wider range of fire severities. Moderate and occasional high‐severity understory fires or crown fires did occur within the study area, as indicated by the scarcity or lack of fire‐scar evidence and the presence of relatively even‐aged forests at several mesic forest sites. Historical section corner data indicate that small amounts of these forest types occurred in the study area. Fire frequency and size declined dramatically circa 1900, coincident with the advent of commercial timber harvesting, although most fires, despite their reduced number and size, continued to burn in the late summer or fall.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/02-5349

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Wright, C. S., & Agee, J. K.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
443-459
ISSN
  • 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5582
OpenAlex
W2143110249
Cited by
160
References
2
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FIRE AND VEGETATION HISTORY IN THE EASTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTON. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/02-5349
The paper
Wright, C. S., & Agee, J. K. (2004). FIRE AND VEGETATION HISTORY IN THE EASTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, WASHINGTON. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.