CARBON DYNAMICS ALONG A CHRONOSEQUENCE OF SLASH PINE PLANTATIONS IN NORTH FLORIDA
Abstract
To determine factors controlling the carbon dynamics of an intensively managed landscape, we measured net CO 2 exchange with the atmosphere using eddy covariance and soil CO 2 fluxes using static chambers along a chronosequence of slash pine (Pinus elliottii var.elliottii) plantations consisting of a recent clearcut, a mid‐rotation (10‐yr‐old) stand, and a rotation‐aged (24‐yr‐old) stand. Daytime net ecosystem exchange of CO 2(NEE day) at the clearcut was not significantly different than zero during the growing season of the first year following harvest and reached levels that were ∼40% of those at the older stands during the second growing season. NEE day was similar at the mid‐rotation and rotation‐aged sites, reflecting the similar leaf areas of these stands. Nighttime net ecosystem exchange of CO 2(NEE night) was an exponential function of air or soil temperature at all sites. However, low decomposition rates of litter and flooding of the site following harvest likely constrained NEE night at the clearcut, and drought affected rates at the mid‐rotation site. Annual net ecosystem exchange of CO 2(NEE yr) was estimated at −1269 and −882 g C·m−2·yr−1 at the clearcut, and 576 and 603 g C·m−2·yr−1 at the mid‐rotation stand in 1998 and 1999, respectively. For comparison, NEE yr was 741 and 610 g C·m−2·yr−1 at the rotation‐aged stand in 1996 and 1997, respectively. In contrast, annual ecosystem respiration (Reco) was similar in magnitude at all sites during all years. Although Reco is similar in magnitude, NEE yr is highly dynamic across this intensively managed landscape, with a maximum range of ∼2000 g C·m−2·yr−1. This range exceeds that across all the sites in both the Ameriflux and Euroflux networks and illustrates the need to include the range of stand ages and disturbance histories in landscape‐ to regional‐scale flux estimates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regenerating forests after logging disturbance remain net sources of CO2 for at least one to two decades, largely due to heterotrophic decomposition of forest residues left on the forest floor.
“In fact, regenerating forests upon such a disturbance have been found to remain as net sources of CO 2 for at least one to two decades after logging and this is largely due to the heterotrophic decomposition of forest residues (FR) left upon the forest floor (Olsson et al., 1996;Yanai et al., 2003;Clark et al., 2004).”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2004
When residues are left in the forest, significant levels of CO2 emissions occur from decomposition of residual biomass that remains in the harvesting pool and gradually oxidizes to the atmosphere.
“Clearly, when residues are left, there are also significant levels of emissions from the decomposition of residual biomass that remains in the harvesting pool that gradually oxidizes as CO 2 to the atmosphere.”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Clark, K. L., Gholz, H. L., & Castro, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
- University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Kenneth L.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1154-1171
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2112929887
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- carbon dynamics, slash pine plantations, Pinus elliottii, net ecosystem exchange, chronosequence, clear-cutting, stand age, soil CO2 flux, ecosystem respiration, nighttime respiration, litter decomposition, drought impacts, forest carbon sequestration, managed forest landscape
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review