The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MULTI-DECADAL IMPACTS OF GRAZING ON SOIL PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN SOUTHEAST UTAH
Abstract
Many soils in southeastern Utah are protected from surface disturbance by biological soil crusts that stabilize soils and reduce erosion by wind and water. When these crusts are disturbed by land use, soils become susceptible to erosion. In this study, we compare a never-grazed grassland in Canyonlands National Park with two historically grazed sites with similar geologic, geomorphic, and geochemical characteristics that were grazed from the late 1800s until 1974. We show that, despite almost 30 years without livestock grazing, surface soils in the historically grazed sites have 38–43% less silt, as well as 14– 51% less total elemental soil Mg, Na, P, and Mn content relative to soils never exposed to livestock disturbances. Using magnetic measurement of soil magnetite content (a proxy for the stabilization of far-traveled eolian dust) we suggest that the differences in Mg, Na, P, and Mn are related to wind erosion of soil fine particles after the historical disturbance by livestock grazing. Historical grazing may also lead to changes in soil organic matter content including declines of 60–70% in surface soil C and N relative to the never-grazed sites. Collectively, the differences in soil C and N content and the evidence for substantial rock-derived nutrient loss to wind erosion implies that livestock grazing could have long-lasting effects on the soil fertility of native grasslands in this part of southeastern Utah. This study suggests that nutrient loss due to wind erosion of soils should be a consideration for management decisions related to the long-term sustainability of grazing operations in arid environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catastrophic vegetation shifts and soil degradation in terrestrial grazing systems
van de Koppel, J., Rietkerk, M., & Weissing, F. J. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01133-6 · Cited by 349
Seastedt, T. R., & Knapp, A. K. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285494 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Zhou, G., Zhou, X., He, Y., Shao, J., Hu, Z., Liu, R., Zhou, H., & Hosseinibai, S. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13431 · Cited by 580
Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Chadwick, D. R., Jones, D. L., Evans, C. D., Jones, M. B., Rees, R. M., & Smith, P. (2018) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.023 · Cited by 537
A Global Meta‐Analysis of Grazing Impacts on Soil Health Indicators
Byrnes, R. C., Eastburn, D. J., Tate, K. W., & Roche, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2017.08.0313 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Neff, J. C., Reynolds, R. L., Belnap, J., & Lamothe, P.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-95
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079019785
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MULTI-DECADAL IMPACTS OF GRAZING ON SOIL PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN SOUTHEAST UTAH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-0268
- The paper
- Neff, J. C., Reynolds, R. L., Belnap, J., & Lamothe, P. (2005). MULTI-DECADAL IMPACTS OF GRAZING ON SOIL PHYSICAL AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN SOUTHEAST UTAH. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.