Cited by 147Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Statistics For Correlated Data: Phylogenies, Space, And Time

Ives, Anthony R., Zhu, Jun·2006·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Here we give an introduction to the growing number of statistical techniques for analyzing data that are not independent realizations of the same sampling process--in other words, correlated data. We focus on regression problems, in which the value of a given variable depends linearly on the value of another variable. To illustrate different types of processes leading to correlated data, we analyze four simulated examples representing diverse problems arising in ecological studies. The first example is a comparison among species to determine the relationship between home-range area and body size; because species are phylogenetically related, they do not represent independent samples. The second example addresses spatial variation in net primary production and how this might be affected by soil nitrogen; because nearby locations are likely to have similar net primary productivity for reasons other than soil nitrogen, spatial correlation is likely. In the third example, we consider a time-series model to ask whether the decrease in density of a butterfly species is the result of decreases in its host-plant density; because the population density of a species in one generation is likely to affect the density in the following generation, time-series data are often correlated. The fourth example combines both spatial and temporal correlation in an experiment in which prey densities are manipulated to determine the response of predators to their food supply. For each of these examp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/04-0702

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even a slight lack of independence can lead to bias in statistical analyses and incorrect conclusions.

    “Even a slight lack of independence can lead to bias in statistical analyses and incorrect conclusions13–15.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ives, A. R., & Zhu, J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Ives, Anthony R.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
20-32
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975661903
Cited by
147
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
correlated data, phylogenetic comparative analysis, spatial autocorrelation, temporal autocorrelation, regression models, body size, net primary productivity, soil nitrogen, host plant density, predator-prey interactions, ecological data analysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Phylogeny, Population Dynamics, Research Design, Time, Models, Statistical, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review