The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE EFFECTS OF GLOBAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY IN PUP PRODUCTION OF ANTARCTIC FUR SEALS
Abstract
Climate variability has strong effects on marine ecosystems, with repercussions that range in scale from those that impact individuals to those that impact the entire food web. Climate-induced changes in the abundance of species in lower trophic levels can cascade up to apex predators by depressing vital rates. However, the characteristics and predictability of predator demographic responses remain largely unexplored. We investigated the detectability, limits, and nonlinearity of changes in Antarctic fur seal pup production at South Georgia over a 20-year period in response to environmental autocorrelation created by global climate perturbations; these were identified in time series of monthly averaged sea surface temperature (SST). Environmental autocorrelation at South Georgia was evident with frequent SST anomalies between 1990 and 1999, during a decade of warm background (time-averaged) conditions. SST anomalies were preceded by, and cross-correlated with, frequent El Niño-La Niña events between 1987 and 1998, which was also a decade of warm background conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Nonlinear mixed-effects models indicated that positive anomalies at South Georgia explained extreme reductions in Antarctic fur seal pup production over 20 years of study. Simulated environmental time series suggested that the effect of anomalies on Antarctic fur seals was only detectable within a narrow range of positive SST, regardless of the distribution, variance, and autocorrelation structure in SST; this explained the observed nonlinearity in responses in pup production, which were observed only under persistent high SST levels. Such anomalies at South Georgia were likely associated with low availability of prey, largely krill, which affected Antarctic fur seal females over time scales longer than their breeding cycle. Reductions in Antarctic fur seal pup production could thus be predicted in advance by the detection of large-scale anomalies, which appeared to be driven by trends in global climate perturbation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marine pelagic ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula
Ducklow, H. W., Baker, K., Martinson, D. G., Quetin, L. B., Ross, R. M., Smith, R. C., Stammerjohn, S. E., Vernet, M., & Fraser, W. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1955 · Cited by 677
Constable, A. J., Melbourne‐Thomas, J., Corney, S. P., Arrigo, K. R., Barbraud, C., Barnes, D. K. A., Bindoff, N. L., Boyd, P. W., Brandt, A., Costa, D. P., et al. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12623 · Cited by 623
Self-citationGlobal Marine Biodiversity Trends
Sala, E., & Knowlton, N. (2006) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100235 · Cited by 394
Impact of climate change on Antarctic krill
Flores, H., Atkinson, A., Kawaguchi, S., Krafft, B., Milinevsky, G., Nicol, S., Reiss, C., Tarling, G., Werner, R., Bravo Rebolledo, E., et al. (2012) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09831 · Cited by 347
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Forcada, J., Trathan, P. N., Reid, K., & Murphy, E. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2408-2417
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098584985
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFECTS OF GLOBAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY IN PUP PRODUCTION OF ANTARCTIC FUR SEALS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-1153
- The paper
- Forcada, J., Trathan, P. N., Reid, K., & Murphy, E. J. (2005). THE EFFECTS OF GLOBAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY IN PUP PRODUCTION OF ANTARCTIC FUR SEALS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.