The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMPARATIVE SEED SHADOWS OF BIRD-, MONKEY-, AND WIND-DISPERSED TREES
Abstract
Although spatial patterns of seed distribution are thought to vary greatly among plant species dispersed by different vectors, few studies have directly examined this assumption. We compared patterns of seed rain of nine species of trees disseminated by large birds, monkeys, and wind in a closed canopy forest in Cameroon. We used maximum-likelihood methods to fit seed rain data to four dispersal functions: inverse power, negative exponential, Gaussian, and Student t. We then tested for differences in dispersal characteristics (1) among individuals within species, and (2) among species dispersed by the same vector. In general, an inverse power function best described animal-dispersed species and the Gaussian and Student t functions best described wind-dispersed species. Animal-dispersed species had longer mean dispersal distances than wind-dispersed species, but lower fecundities. In addition to these distinct differences in average dispersal distance and functional form of the seed shadow between animal- and wind-dispersed species, seed shadows varied markedly within species and vector, with conspecifics and species within vector varying in their dispersal scale, fecundity, and clumping parameters. Dispersal vectors determine a significant amount of variation in seed distribution, but much variation remains to be explained. Finally, we demonstrate that most seeds, regardless of vector, fall directly under the parent canopy. Long-distance dispersal events (>60 m) account for a small proportion of the seed crop but may still be important in terms of the absolute numbers of dispersed seeds and effects on population and community dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests
Janzen, D. H. (1970) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282687 · Cited by 4,774
Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Strawderman, R. L., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669574 · Cited by 4,194
Howe, H. F., & Smallwood, J. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001221 · Cited by 3,545
Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants
van der Pijl, L. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-87925-8 · Cited by 2,189
Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment
Nathan, R., & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01874-7 · Cited by 2,094
Connell, J. H., & Connell, J. H. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,093
The ecological detective: confronting models with data
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1501 · Cited by 1,726
Long‐distance seed dispersal in plant populations
Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G., & Strand, A. E. (2000) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/2656714 · Cited by 1,176
All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference
Wasserman, L. (2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21736-9 · Cited by 1,090
Cited by
V. H. Safar, N., van der Sande, M., G. R. Schaefer, C. E., S. Magnago, L. F., Martins, S. V., Simonelli, M., & Poorter, L. (2022) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120395 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, C. J., Poulsen, J. R., Bolker, B. M., Connor, E. F., & Parker, V. T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2684-2694
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075434123
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARATIVE SEED SHADOWS OF BIRD-, MONKEY-, AND WIND-DISPERSED TREES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-1325
- The paper
- Clark, C. J., Poulsen, J. R., Bolker, B. M., Connor, E. F., & Parker, V. T. (2005). COMPARATIVE SEED SHADOWS OF BIRD-, MONKEY-, AND WIND-DISPERSED TREES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.