Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

Open access
Strawderman, Robert L., Burnham, Kenneth P., Anderson, David R.·2000·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

We wrote this book to introduce graduate students and research workers in various scientific disciplines to the use of information-theoretic approaches in the analysis of empirical data.In its fully developed form, the information-theoretic approach allows inference based on more than one model (including estimates of unconditional precision); in its initial form, it is useful in selecting a "best" model and ranking the remaining models.We believe that often the critical issue in data analysis is the selection of a good approximating model that best represents the inference supported by the data (an estimated "best approximating model").Information theory includes the well-known Kullback-Leibler "distance" between two models (actually, probability distributions), and this represents a fundamental quantity in science.In 1973, Hirotugu Akaike derived an estimator of the (relative) Kullback-Leibler distance based on Fisher's maximized log-likelihood.His measure, now called Akaike 's information criterion (AIC), provided a new paradigm for model selection in the analysis of empirical data.His approach, with a fundamental link to information theory, is relatively simple and easy to use in practice, but little taught in statistics classes and far less understood in the applied sciences than should be the case.We do not accept the notion that there is a simple, "true model" in the biological sciences.Instead, we view modeling as an exercise in the approximation of the explainable information in the empirical data, in the context of the data being a sample from some well-defined population or process.Selection of a best approximating model represents the inference from the data and tells us what "effects" (represented by parameters) can be supported by the data.We focus on Akaike's information criterion (and various extensions) for selection of a parsimonious model as a basis for statistical inference.Later chapters offer formal methods to

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2669574

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 4,194

Metadata

Authors
Strawderman, R. L., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-03
Volume
95
Issue
449
Pages
341
ISSN
0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077959816
Cited by
4,194
References
0
FWCI
241.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2669574
The paper
Strawderman, R. L., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2000). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.