The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FISH INVASION RESTRUCTURES STREAM AND FOREST FOOD WEBS BY INTERRUPTING RECIPROCAL PREY SUBSIDIES
Abstract
Habitat alteration and biotic invasions are the two leading causes of global environmental change and biodiversity loss. Recent innovative experiments have shown that habitat disturbance can have drastic effects that cascade to adjacent ecosystems by altering the flow of resource subsidies from donor systems. Likewise, exotic species invasions could alter subsidies and affect distant food webs, but very few studies have tested this experimentally. Here we report evidence from a large-scale field experiment in northern Japan that invasion of nonnative rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) interrupted reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey that drove stream and adjacent riparian forest food webs. Rainbow trout usurped terrestrial prey that fell into the stream, causing native Dolly Varden charr (Salvelinus malma) to shift their foraging to insects that graze algae from the stream bottom. This indirectly increased algal biomass, but also decreased biomass of adult aquatic insects emerging from the stream to the forest. In turn, this led to a 65% reduction in the density of riparian-specialist spiders in the forest. Thus, species invasions can interrupt flows of resources between interconnected ecosystems and have effects that propagate across their boundaries, effects that may be difficult to anticipate without in-depth understanding of food web relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Cited by
Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward
Simberloff, D., Martin, J.-L., Genovesi, P., Maris, V., Wardle, D. A., Aronson, J., Courchamp, F., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Pascal, M., et al. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013 · Cited by 3,344
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P., & Lockwood, J. L. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0183.1 · Cited by 760
Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., & Hoeinghaus, D. J. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-048.1 · Cited by 266
Letnic, M., Webb, J. K., & Shine, R. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.031 · Cited by 192
Linking removal targets to the ecological effects of invaders: a predictive model and field test
Green, S. J., Dulvy, N. K., Brooks, A. M. L., Akins, J. L., Cooper, A. B., Miller, S., & Côté, I. M. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-0979.1 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, C. V., Fausch, K. D., Murakami, M., & Chapman, P. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2656-2663
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168484803
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FISH INVASION RESTRUCTURES STREAM AND FOREST FOOD WEBS BY INTERRUPTING RECIPROCAL PREY SUBSIDIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-138
- The paper
- Baxter, C. V., Fausch, K. D., Murakami, M., & Chapman, P. L. (2004). FISH INVASION RESTRUCTURES STREAM AND FOREST FOOD WEBS BY INTERRUPTING RECIPROCAL PREY SUBSIDIES. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.