Cited by 288Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management Studies

COMPETITION, PREDATION, AND DENSITY-DEPENDENT MORTALITY IN DEMERSAL MARINE FISHES

Hixon, Mark A., Jones, Geoffrey P.·2005·Ecology

Abstract

The relative roles of competition and predation in demographic density dependence are poorly known. A tractable experimental design to determine such effects and their interactions for demersal (seafloor oriented) fishes and similar sedentary species is cross-factoring multiple densities of new recruits with the presence and absence of predators. This design allows one to distinguish between density-dependent mortality due to competition alone, predation alone, or an interaction between the two, especially when supplemental field observations are available. To date, 14 species of marine fish have been examined with some variant of this design, and for 12 species predation was demonstrated to be the sole or major cause of density dependence. However, as competition may be slow acting relative to predation, the importance of competition can be underestimated in short-term experiments. On the Great Barrier Reef, we conducted a long-term field experiment in which multiple densities of new recruits of a planktivorous damselfish were cross-factored with the presence or absence of resident piscivorous fish on patch reefs. During the first 10 months, no density-dependent mortality was detected, regardless of whether resident predators were present or absent. By the end of the experiment at 17 months, per capita mortality was strongly density dependent and highly compensatory in both predator treatments; all reefs ultimately supported nearly the same adult density regardless of experimental treatment. Examination of treatment effect sizes suggested that competition was the main source of density-dependent mortality, with predation being merely a proximate agent of death. We hypothesize that predators were ineffective in this system compared with similar studies elsewhere because prey density was low relative to ample prey refuges provided by highly complex corals. Combined with previous studies, these findings indicate that density-dependent mortality in demersal marine fishes is often caused by interplay of predation and competition, whose roles may be altered by variation in habitat complexity and larval supply. These conclusions are relevant to marine fisheries models, which typically assume that density dependence is due solely to intraspecific competition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/04-1455

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Bailey, K. M. 1994. Predation on juvenile flatfish and recruitment variability. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 32 :175-189.
  2. Caley, M. J. 1998. Age-specific mortality rates in reef fishes: evidence and implications. Australian Journal of Ecology 23 :241-245.
  3. Caley, M. J., M. H. Carr, M. A. Hixon, T. P. Hughes, G. P. Jones, and B. A. Menge. 1996. Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27 :477-500.
  4. Carr, M. H., T. W. Anderson, and M. A. Hixon. 2002. Biodiversity, population regulation, and the stability of coralreef fish communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 :11241-11245.
  5. Chase, J. M., P. A. Abrams, J. P . Grover, S. Diehl, P . Chesson, R. D. Holt, S. A. Richards, R. M. Nisbet, and T. J. Case. 2002. The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecology Letters 5 :302-315.
  6. Chesson, P. L. 1998. Recruitment limitation: a theoretical perspective. Australian Journal of Ecology 23 :234-240.
  7. Connell, J. H. 1975. Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. Pages 460-490 in M. L. Cody and J. A. Diamond, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap-Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  8. Doherty, P. J. 1998. Recruitment limitation: definitions, predictions and tests. Pages 129-131 in G. P. Jones, P. J. Doherty, B. D. Mapstone, and L. Howlett, editors. Reef fish '95: recruitment and population dynamics of coral reef fishes. CRC Reef Research Center, Townsville, Australia.
  9. Doherty, P. J. 2002. Variable replenishment and the dynamics of reef fish populations. Pages 327-355 in P. F . Sale, editor. Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  10. Hamner, W. M., M. S. Jones, J. H. Carleton, I. R. Hauri, and D. M. Williams. 1988. Zooplankton, planktivorous fish, and water currents on a windward reef face: Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Bulletin of Marine Science 42 :459-479.
  11. Harrison, S., and N. Cappuccino. 1995. Using density-manipulation experiments to study population regulation. Pages 131-147 in N. Cappuccino and P. W. Price, editors. Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  12. Hixon, M. A. 1991. Predation as a process structuring coral reef fish communities. Pages 475-508 in P. F. Sale, editor.
  13. Hixon, M. A. 1998. Population dynamics of coral-reef fishes: controversial concepts and hypotheses. Australian Journal of Ecology 23 :192-201.
  14. Hixon, M. A., and M. S. Webster. 2002. Density dependence in reef fish populations. Pages 303-325 in P. F . Sale, editor. Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  15. Hobson, E. S. 1991. Trophic relationships of fishes specialized to feed on zooplankters above coral reefs. Pages 6995 in P. F . Sale, editor. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  16. Houde, E. D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability. American Fisheries Society Symposium Series 2 :17-29.
  17. Jeffries, M. J., and J. H. Lawton. 1984. Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23 :269-286.
  18. Johnson, D. W. In press . Density dependence in marine fish populations revealed by small-scale experiments and largescale observations. Ecology.
  19. Jones, G. P. 1991. Postrecruitment processes in the ecology of coral reef fish populations: a multifactorial perspective. Pages 294-328 in P. F. Sale, editor. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  20. Jones, G. P., and M. I. McCormick. 2002. Interaction between energetic and numerical processes in the ecology of coral reef fish populations. Pages 221-238 in P. F. Sale, editor. Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
  21. Levin, P. S. 1998. The significance of variable and densityindependent post-recruitment mortality in local populations of reef fishes. Australian Journal of Ecology 23 :246-251.
  22. McCormick, M. I. 1998. Condition and growth of reef fish at settlement: is it important? Australian Journal of Ecology 23 :258-264.
  23. Myers, R. A. 2002. Recruitment: understanding density-dependence in fish populations. Pages 123-148 in P. J. B. Hart and J. D. Reynolds, editors. Handbook of fish biology and fisheries. 1. Fish biology. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, USA.
  24. Myers, R. A., and N. G. Cadigan. 1993. Density-dependent juvenile mortality in marine demersal fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50 :1576-1590.
  25. Osenberg, C. W., C. M. S. Mary, R. J. Schmitt, S. J. Holbrook, P. Chesson, and B. Byrne. 2002. Rethinking ecological inference: density dependence in reef fishes. Ecology Letters 5 :715-721.
  26. Osenberg, C. W., and G. G. Mittelbach. 1996. The relative importance of resource limitation and predator limitation in food chains. Pages 134-148 in G. A. Polis and K. O. Winemiller, editors. Food webs: interaction of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
  27. Pimm, S. L., and J. B. Hyman. 1987. Ecological stability in the context of multispecies fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44 :84-94.
  28. Polis, G. A., C. A. Myers, and R. D. Holt. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20 :297-330.
  29. Randall, J. E., G. R. Allen, and R. C. Steene. 1990. Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  30. Rothschild, B. J. 1986. Dynamics of marine fish populations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  31. Schmitt, R. J., S. J. Holbrook, and C. W. Osenberg. 1999. Quantifying the effects of multiple processes on local abundance: a cohort approach for open populations. Ecology Letters 2 :294-303.
  32. Sih, A., P. Crowley, M. McPeek, J. Petranka, and K. Strohmeier. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16 :269-311.
  33. Sissenwine, M. P. 1984. Why do fish populations vary? Pages 59-94 in R. M. May, editor. Exploitation of marine communities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  34. Smith, T. D. 1994. Scaling fisheries: the science of measuring the effects of fishing, 1855-1955. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  35. Sogard, S. M. 1997. Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fish: a review. Bulletin of Marine Science 60 :1129-1157.
  36. Stevenson, R. A. 1972. Regulation of feeding behavior of the bicolor damselfish ( Eupomacentrus partitus Poey) by environmental factors. Pages 278-302 in H. E. Winn and B. L. Olla, editors. Behavior of marine animals. Volume 2. Vertebrates. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
  37. Webster, M. S., and G. R. Almany. 2002. Positive indirect effects in a coral reef fish community. Ecology Letters 5 : 549-557.
  38. Winer, B. J. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hixon, M. A., & Jones, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hixon, Mark A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
86
Issue
11
Pages
2847-2859
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081598442
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
density-dependent mortality, competition (biology), predation, demersal fish, Pomacentridae, compensatory mortality, prey refuge, habitat complexity, coral reefs, patch reefs, larval supply, Great Barrier Reef

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review