The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in spatial ecology have improved our understanding of the role of large-scale animal movements.However, an unsolved problem concerns the inherent stochasticity involved in many animal search displacements and its possible adaptive value.When animals have no information about where targets (i.e., resource patches, mates, etc.) are located, different random search strategies may provide different chances to find them.Assuming random-walk models as a necessary tool to understand how animals face such environmental uncertainty, we analyze the statistical differences between two random-walk models commonly used to fit animal movement data, the Le ´vy walks and the correlated random walks, and we quantify their efficiencies (i.e., the number of targets found in relation to total displacement) within a random search context.Correlated random-walk properties (i.e., scale-finite correlations) may be interpreted as the by-product of locally scanning mechanisms.Le ´vy walks, instead, have fundamental properties (i.e., super-diffusivity and scale invariance) that allow a higher efficiency in random search scenarios.Specific biological mechanisms related to how animals punctuate their movement with sudden reorientations in a random search would be sufficient to sustain Le ´vy walk properties.Furthermore, we investigate a new model (the Le ´vy-modulated correlated random walk) that combines the properties of correlated and Le ´vy walks.This model shows that Le ´vy walk properties are robust to any behavioral mechanism providing short-range correlations in the walk.We propose that some animals may have evolved the ability of performing Le ´vy walks as adaptive strategies in order to face search uncertainties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA): A nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer
Abualigah, L., Elaziz, M. A., Sumari, P., Geem, Z. W., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116158 · Cited by 1,433
Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour
Sims, D. W., Southall, E. J., Humphries, N. E., Hays, G. C., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Pitchford, J. W., James, A., Ahmed, M. Z., Brierley, A. S., Hindell, M. A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06518 · Cited by 959
Mapping the Origins and Expansion of the Indo-European Language Family
Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray, R. D., Suchard, M. A., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219669 · Cited by 801
Barthelemy, P., Bertolotti, J., & Wiersma, D. S. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06948 · Cited by 743
Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches
Viswanathan, G. M., Raposo, E. P., & da Luz, M. G. E. (2008) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2008.03.002 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M. G. E., Viswanathan, G. M., & Catalan, J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3078-3087
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966750113
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-1806
- The paper
- Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M. G. E., Viswanathan, G. M., & Catalan, J. (2005). ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.