Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS

Open access
Bartumeus, Frederic, da Luz, M. G E., Viswanathan, G. M., Catalan, J.·2005·Ecology

Abstract

Recent advances in spatial ecology have improved our understanding of the role of large-scale animal movements.However, an unsolved problem concerns the inherent stochasticity involved in many animal search displacements and its possible adaptive value.When animals have no information about where targets (i.e., resource patches, mates, etc.) are located, different random search strategies may provide different chances to find them.Assuming random-walk models as a necessary tool to understand how animals face such environmental uncertainty, we analyze the statistical differences between two random-walk models commonly used to fit animal movement data, the Le ´vy walks and the correlated random walks, and we quantify their efficiencies (i.e., the number of targets found in relation to total displacement) within a random search context.Correlated random-walk properties (i.e., scale-finite correlations) may be interpreted as the by-product of locally scanning mechanisms.Le ´vy walks, instead, have fundamental properties (i.e., super-diffusivity and scale invariance) that allow a higher efficiency in random search scenarios.Specific biological mechanisms related to how animals punctuate their movement with sudden reorientations in a random search would be sufficient to sustain Le ´vy walk properties.Furthermore, we investigate a new model (the Le ´vy-modulated correlated random walk) that combines the properties of correlated and Le ´vy walks.This model shows that Le ´vy walk properties are robust to any behavioral mechanism providing short-range correlations in the walk.We propose that some animals may have evolved the ability of performing Le ´vy walks as adaptive strategies in order to face search uncertainties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/04-1806

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 703

Metadata

Authors
Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M. G. E., Viswanathan, G. M., & Catalan, J.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
86
Issue
11
Pages
3078-3087
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966750113
Cited by
703
References
0
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/04-1806
The paper
Bartumeus, F., da Luz, M. G. E., Viswanathan, G. M., & Catalan, J. (2005). ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM-WALK ANALYSIS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1806

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.