The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPECIES IDENTITY DOMINATES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDATOR BIODIVERSITY AND HERBIVORE SUPPRESSION
Abstract
Agricultural pest suppression is an important ecosystem service that may be threatened by the loss of predator diversity. This has stimulated interest in the relationship between predator biodiversity and biological control. Multiple-predator studies have shown that predators may complement or interfere with one another, but few experiments have determined if the resulting effects on prey are caused by changes in predator abundance, identity, species richness, or some combination of these factors. We experimentally isolated the effect of predator species richness on the biological control of an important agricultural pest, the green peach aphid. We found no evidence that increasing predator species richness affects aphid biological control; overall there was no strong complementarity or interference among predator species that altered the strength of aphid suppression. Instead, our experiments revealed strong effects of predator species identity, because predators varied dramatically in their per capita consumption rates. Our results are consistent with other multiple-predator studies finding strong species-identity effects and suggest that, for the biological control of aphids, conservation strategies that directly target key species will be more effective than those targeting predator biodiversity more broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., & Gurr, G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175 · Cited by 3,100
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373
Ives, A. R., Cardinale, B. J., & Snyder, W. E. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00698.x · Cited by 448
Self-citationGrazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds
Emmett Duffy, J., Paul Richardson, J., & Canuel, E. A. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00474.x · Cited by 346
Cited by
Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale
Tscharntke, T., Bommarco, R., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Kleijn, D., Rand, T. A., Tylianakis, J. M., Nouhuys, S. V., & Vidal, S. (2007) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 776
Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., & Woodward, G. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018 · Cited by 607
Letourneau, D. K., Jedlicka, J. A., Bothwell, S. G., & Moreno, C. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120320 · Cited by 596
PREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS
Schmitz, O. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0937.1 · Cited by 485
Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals?
Straub, C. S., Finke, D. L., & Snyder, W. E. (2008) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.013 · Cited by 381
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Straub, C. S., & Snyder, W. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-282
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156045375
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPECIES IDENTITY DOMINATES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDATOR BIODIVERSITY AND HERBIVORE SUPPRESSION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/05-0599
- The paper
- Straub, C. S., & Snyder, W. E. (2006). SPECIES IDENTITY DOMINATES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDATOR BIODIVERSITY AND HERBIVORE SUPPRESSION. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.