The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS
Abstract
The recognition that predators play important roles in ecosystems has prompted research to resolve how combinations of predator species influence ecosystem functions. Interactions among predator species and their prey can lead to a host of linear and nonlinear effects. Understanding the conditions causing these effects is critical for assigning predator species to functional groups in ways that lead to predictive theory of predator diversity effects on trophic interactions. To this end, I provide a synthesis of experiments examining multiple-predator-species effects on mortality of single shared prey. I show how experimental design and experimental venue can determine the conclusion about the importance of predator diversity on trophic interactions. In addition, I link natural history insights on predator species habitat and hunting behavior with linear and nonlinear multiple-predator effects to derive a new concept of predator diversity effects on trophic interactions. This concept holds that the nature of predator diversity effects is contingent upon predator species hunting mode plus predator and prey species habitat domain (defined as the spatial extent to which a microhabitat is used by a species). This concept allows the classification of multiple-predator effects into four broad functional categories: substitutable, nonlinear due to predator species interference, nonlinear due to intraguild predation, and nonlinear due to predator species synergism. Experimental evidence so far provides ample and comparatively equal support for substitutable, interference, and intraguild effects, and equivocal support for nonlinear synergisms. The paper closes by discussing ways to further a research program aimed at using the building blocks presented here to understand predator functional diversity and trophic interactions in complex ecological systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x · Cited by 4,455
Schoener, T. W. (1971) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101 · Cited by 3,572
Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments
Loreau, M., & Hector, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35083573 · Cited by 3,528
Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward
Petchey, O. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x · Cited by 2,571
Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics
Polis, G. A., & Strong, D. R. (1996) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285880 · Cited by 2,109
Can Generalist Predators be Effective Biocontrol Agents?
Symondson, W. O. C., Sunderland, K. D., & Greenstone, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145240 · Cited by 1,535
DECLINING MOUNTAIN SNOWPACK IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA*
Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2005) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-86-1-39 · Cited by 1,492
Cited by
Letourneau, D. K., Jedlicka, J. A., Bothwell, S. G., & Moreno, C. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120320 · Cited by 596
Herbivory from Individuals to Ecosystems
Schmitz, O. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173418 · Cited by 286
Self-citationHeithaus, M. R., Wirsing, A. J., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., & Dill, L. M. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01512.x · Cited by 239
Cascading effects of predator richness
Bruno, J. F., & Cardinale, B. J. (2008) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/070136 · Cited by 210
Crowder, D. W., & Jabbour, R. (2014) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.10.010 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitz, O. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2415-2426
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120058969
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 18.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/06-0937.1
- The paper
- Schmitz, O. J. (2007). PREDATOR DIVERSITY AND TROPHIC INTERACTIONS. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0937.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.