The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NITROGEN INPUTS PROMOTE THE SPREAD OF AN INVASIVE MARSH GRASS
Abstract
Excess nutrient loading and large‐scale invasion by nonnatives are two of the most pervasive and damaging threats to the biotic and economic integrity of our estuaries. Individually, these are potent forces, but it is important to consider their interactive impacts as well. In this study we investigated the potential limitation of a nonnative intertidal grass, Spartina alterniflora, by nitrogen (N) in estuaries of the western United States. Nitrogen fertilization experiments were conducted in three mud‐flat habitats invaded by S. alterniflora in Willapa Bay, Washington, USA, that differed in sediment N. We carried out parallel experiments in San Francisco Bay, California, USA, in three habitats invaded by hybrid Spartina (S. alterniflora × S. foliosa), in previously unvegetated mud flat, and in native S. foliosa or Salicornia virginica marshes. We found similar aboveground biomass and growth rates between habitats and estuaries, but end‐of‐season belowground biomass was nearly five times greater in San Francisco Bay than in Willapa Bay. In Willapa Bay, aboveground biomass was significantly correlated with sediment N content. Addition of N significantly increased aboveground biomass, stem density, and the rate of spread into uninvaded habitat (as new stems per day) in virtually all habitats in both estuaries. Belowground biomass increased in Willapa Bay only, suggesting that belowground biomass is not N limited in San Francisco Bay due to species differences, N availability, or a latitudinal difference in the response of Spartina to N additions. The relative impact of added N was greater in Willapa Bay, the estuary with lower N inputs from the watershed, than in San Francisco Bay, a highly eutrophic estuary. Nitrogen fertilization also altered the competitive interaction between hybrid Spartina and Salicornia virginica in San Francisco Bay by increasing the density and biomass of the invader and decreasing the density of the native. There was no significant effect of N on the native, Spartina foliosa. Our results indicate that excess N loading to these ecosystems enhances the vulnerability of intertidal habitats to rapid invasion by nonnative Spartina sp.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mycorrhizas and soil structure
Rillig, M. C., & Mummey, D. L. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x · Cited by 1,761
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
A meta‐analysis of context‐dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi
Hoeksema, J. D., Chaudhary, V. B., Gehring, C. A., Johnson, N. C., Karst, J., Koide, R. T., Pringle, A., Zabinski, C., Bever, J. D., Moore, J. C., et al. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x · Cited by 1,199
Bever, J. D. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x · Cited by 873
Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss
Smith, M. D., & Knapp, A. K. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x · Cited by 824
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyler, A. C., Lambrinos, J. G., & Grosholz, E. D.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1886-1898
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2044381851
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NITROGEN INPUTS PROMOTE THE SPREAD OF AN INVASIVE MARSH GRASS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/06-0822.1
- The paper
- Tyler, A. C., Lambrinos, J. G., & Grosholz, E. D. (2007). NITROGEN INPUTS PROMOTE THE SPREAD OF AN INVASIVE MARSH GRASS. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0822.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.