Cited by 239Wildlife Ecology and ConservationIchthyology and Marine BiologyMarine animal studies overview

Towards a predictive framework for predator risk effects: the interaction of landscape features and prey escape tactics

Open access
Heithaus, Michael R., Wirsing, Aaron J., Burkholder, Derek, Thomson, Jordan, Dill, Lawrence M.·2009·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Risk effects of predators can profoundly affect community dynamics, but the nature of these effects is context dependent. Although context dependence has hindered the development of a general framework for predicting the nature and extent of risk effects, recent studies suggest that such a framework is attainable if the factors that shape anti‐predator behaviour, and its effectiveness, in natural communities are well understood. One of these factors, the interaction of prey escape tactics and landscape features, has been largely overlooked. We tested whether this interaction gives rise to interspecific variation in habitat‐use patterns of sympatric large marine vertebrates at risk of tiger shark ( Galeocerdo cuvier Peron and LeSueur, 1822) predation. Specifically, we tested the a priori hypothesis that pied cormorants ( Phalacrocorax varius Gmelin, 1789) would modify their use of shallow seagrass habitats in a manner opposite to that of previously studied dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus Ehrenberg, 1833), dugongs ( Dugong dugon Müller, 1776), and green turtles ( Chelonia mydas Linnaeus, 1758) because, unlike these species, the effectiveness of cormorant escape behaviour does not vary spatially. As predicted, cormorants used interior and edge portions of banks proportional to the abundance of their potential prey when sharks were absent but shifted to interior portions of banks to minimize encounters with tiger sharks as predation risk increased. Other shark prey, however, shift to edge microhabitats when shark densities increase to take advantage of easier escape despite higher encounter rates with sharks. The interaction of landscape features and escape ability likely is important in diverse communities. When escape probabilities are high in habitats with high predator density, risk effects of predators can reverse the direction of commonly assumed indirect effects of top predators. The interaction between landscape features and prey escape tactics can result in a single predator species having differential effects on their sympatric prey that could cascade through ecosystems and should be incorporated into a general framework for context dependence of risk effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01512.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vegetation structure, along with topography, is most relevant to predation through its influence on visibility, both in terms of predator concealment and prey detection of predators, as well as affecting the ability of prey to escape attack.

    “Vegetation structure, along with topography, is most relevant to predation through its influence on visibility, both in terms of predator concealment and prey detection of predators, as well as affecting the ability of prey to escape attack (see [18]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heithaus, M. R., Wirsing, A. J., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., & Dill, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-31
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
556-562
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2063871508
Cited by
239
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0745606, 0526065)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (A6869)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
antipredator behavior, landscape elements, habitat use, tiger shark, Phalacrocorax varius, context sensitivity, top-down effects, indirect effects, encounter rate
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Dolphins, Escape Reaction, Predatory Behavior, Risk Factors, Sharks, Ecosystem, Dugong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review